Literature DB >> 9475092

Chromosome specific comparative genome hybridisation for determining the origin of intrachromosomal duplications.

D K Griffin1, D Sanoudou, E Adamski, C McGiffert, P O'Brien, J Wienberg, M A Ferguson-Smith.   

Abstract

Chromosome specific comparative genome hybridisation (CGH) is a novel approach for the detection of cytogenetic abnormalities. It combines flow sorting of chromosomes, degenerate oligonucleotide primed (DOP)-PCR and a modified comparative genome hybridisation (CGH) technique to define the site and extent of intrachromosomal duplications. Chromosome specific paint probes for aberrant chromosomes and their normal homologues from four subjects with unbalanced duplications within chromosomes 2p11-15, 3q25-26, 5q34-qter, and 12q23-24.2 were made. They were then cohybridised on normal metaphase spreads and the ratio of their relative intensities of hybridisation analysed. The results were compared to those of similar experiments where regular CGH was performed on the same four patients. We provide evidence that this method can detect duplications and deficiencies which might be missed by conventional CGH, as the ratio of hybridisation of abnormal/normal DNA is 2:1 rather than 3:2. It is the method of choice where mosaicism is present or where only one of several homologous chromosomes is duplicated. Furthermore, it suggests that DOP-PCR amplifies all or most of the euchromatic regions of the genome equally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9475092      PMCID: PMC1051184          DOI: 10.1136/jmg.35.1.37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  8 in total

1.  Reverse chromosome painting: a method for the rapid analysis of aberrant chromosomes in clinical cytogenetics.

Authors:  N P Carter; M A Ferguson-Smith; M T Perryman; H Telenius; A H Pelmear; M A Leversha; M T Glancy; S L Wood; K Cook; H M Dyson
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Prenatal identification of i(Yp) by molecular cytogenetic analysis.

Authors:  B B Wang; L C Yu; W Peng; R E Falk; J Williams
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Comparative genomic hybridization in clinical cytogenetics.

Authors:  T Bryndorf; M Kirchhoff; H Rose; J Maahr; T Gerdes; R Karhu; A Kallioniemi; B Christensen; C Lundsteen; J Philip
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Identification of cryptic sites of DNA sequence amplification in human breast cancer by chromosome microdissection.

Authors:  X Y Guan; P S Meltzer; W S Dalton; J M Trent
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors.

Authors:  A Kallioniemi; O P Kallioniemi; D Sudar; D Rutovitz; J W Gray; F Waldman; D Pinkel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-10-30       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Positional cloning of genes involved in the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, hemihypertrophy, and associated childhood tumors.

Authors:  M Mannens; M Alders; B Redeker; J Bliek; M Steenman; C Wiesmeyer; M de Meulemeester; A Ryan; L Kalikin; T Voûte; J De Kraker; J Hoovers; R Slater; A Feinberg; P Little; A Westerveld
Journal:  Med Pediatr Oncol       Date:  1996-11

7.  Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using DOP-PCR amplified flow-sorted chromosomes.

Authors:  H Telenius; A H Pelmear; A Tunnacliffe; N P Carter; A Behmel; M A Ferguson-Smith; M Nordenskjöld; R Pfragner; B A Ponder
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Clinically distinct subgroups of glioblastoma multiforme studied by comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  R G Weber; C Sommer; F K Albert; M Kiessling; T Cremer
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.662

  8 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Reverse painting highlights the origin of chromosome aberrations.

Authors:  Elisabeth Blennow
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Dental pulp pluripotent-like stem cells (DPPSC), a new stem cell population with chromosomal stability and osteogenic capacity for biomaterials evaluation.

Authors:  Raquel Núñez-Toldrà; Ester Martínez-Sarrà; Carlos Gil-Recio; Miguel Ángel Carrasco; Ashraf Al Madhoun; Sheyla Montori; Maher Atari
Journal:  BMC Cell Biol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.