Literature DB >> 9474074

Responsiveness to change in health-related quality of life in a randomized clinical trial: a comparison of the Prostate Cancer Specific Quality of Life Instrument (PROSQOLI) with analogous scales from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and a trial specific module. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

M R Stockler1, D Osoba, P Goodwin, P Corey, I F Tannock.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Prostate Cancer Specific Quality of Life Instrument (PROSQOLI) was developed to be a pragmatic outcome measure for clinical trials in symptomatic men with advanced hormone-resistant prostate cancer. DESIGN AND
SETTING: A comparative assessment of responsiveness was made with longitudinal data from a positive multicenter randomized trial of palliative chemotherapy in 161 symptomatic men with advanced hormone-resistant prostate cancer. INSTRUMENTS: The PROSQOLI, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30), and a specific quality of life module for advanced prostate cancer [QLM-P14] were administered every 3 weeks while patients received their allocated treatment.
FINDINGS: Sixteen of the 19 health-related quality of life (HRQL) scales demonstrated improvements in palliative responders. All three pain scales detected a beneficial effect of palliative chemotherapy. The relative efficiency statistics favored the PROSQOLI for physical symptoms and physical function but the QLQ-C30 for emotional function, social function, and global perceptions. The PROSQOLI linear analog scale was the most responsive measure of pain. Bootstrap confidence intervals for the relative efficiency statistics were wide.
CONCLUSIONS: Both the PROSQOLI and the analogous scales from the QLQ-C30 were responsive to improvements in HRQL. Differences between the instruments were generally subtle. The PROSQOLI is a short, simple, responsive measure of HRQL in men receiving systemic treatment for advanced hormone-resistant prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9474074     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00269-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  14 in total

1.  On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation.

Authors:  C B Terwee; F W Dekker; W M Wiersinga; M F Prummel; P M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Prostate cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  Hatzimouratidis Konstantinos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  The validity and utility of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory in patients with prostate cancer: evidence from the Symptom Outcomes and Practice Patterns (SOAPP) data from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  Desiree Jones; Fengmin Zhao; Michael J Fisch; Lynne I Wagner; Linda J Patrick-Miller; Charles S Cleeland; Tito R Mendoza
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 4.  A review of quality-of-life evaluations in prostate cancer.

Authors:  S D Sommers; S D Ramsey
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Perception of quality of life by patients, partners and treating physicians.

Authors:  K A Wilson; A J Dowling; M Abdolell; I F Tannock
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Prostate cancer and health-related quality of life: a review of the literature.

Authors:  David T Eton; Stephen J Lepore
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content.

Authors:  Lidwine B Mokkink; Caroline B Terwee; Dirk L Knol; Paul W Stratford; Jordi Alonso; Donald L Patrick; Lex M Bouter; Henrica Cw de Vet
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Responsiveness of the generic EQ-5D summary measure compared to the disease-specific EORTC QLQ C-30.

Authors:  Paul F M Krabbe; Lonneke Peerenboom; Barbara S Langenhoff; Theo J M Ruers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Responsiveness of the quality of life in epilepsy inventory (QOLIE-89) in an antiepileptic drug trial.

Authors:  Sehyun Kim; Ron D Hays; Gretchen L Birbeck; Barbara G Vickrey
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Statistical significant change versus relevant or important change in (quasi) experimental design: some conceptual and methodological problems in estimating magnitude of intervention-related change in health services research.

Authors:  Berrie Middel; Eric van Sonderen
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2002-12-17       Impact factor: 5.120

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.