Literature DB >> 9472827

Characterizing output for the Varian enhanced dynamic wedge field.

C Liu1, Z Li, J R Palta.   

Abstract

The output factor for an enhanced dynamic wedge (EDW) field, like that for a dynamic wedge field, is a complex function of the field dimension in the wedge direction. The large change in output for different field sizes (varying more than 40% for a 60 degrees wedge angle) is due to rescaling of the golden segmented treatment table (GSTT), which specifies the cumulative monitor unit weighting as a function of moving jaw position. The rescaling of the GSTT results in increased output on the central axis with a decrease in the value of the final moving jaw position in the wedge plane. The output factor (in air or in water) on the central axis of an EDW field can be predicted to within 1% by multiplying the output factor (in air or in water) of an open field of the same size with the ratio of the normalized GSTT (NGSTT) value at 4.5 cm, which corresponds to a 10 cm x 10 cm square field, to the NGSTT value at the final moving jaw position for the EDW field. Once the NGSTT factor is separated from the output for EDW fields, the field-size-dependent wedge factor varies less than 1%. This approach allows a simple and accurate determination of the output factor for rectangular and asymmetric EDW fields. The equivalent square method for determining output for rectangular fields applies to EDW fields with the same precision as it does to open fields. The output for EDW fields strongly depends on the final moving jaw position. Every 5-mm change in the final moving jaw position causes 3.5-5.4% error in monitor unit calculation.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9472827     DOI: 10.1118/1.598161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  Monitor unit calculations for external photon and electron beams: Report of the AAPM Therapy Physics Committee Task Group No. 71.

Authors:  John P Gibbons; John A Antolak; David S Followill; M Saiful Huq; Eric E Klein; Kwok L Lam; Jatinder R Palta; Donald M Roback; Mark Reid; Faiz M Khan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Studying wedge factors and beam profiles for physical and enhanced dynamic wedges.

Authors:  Misbah Ahmad; Amjad Hussain; Wazir Muhammad; Syed Qaisar Abbas Rizvi
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2010-01

3.  Analytical correction of an extension of the "MU Fraction Approximation" for Varian enhanced dynamic wedges.

Authors:  Michael S Gossman; Subhash C Sharma
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2010-04

4.  Comparison of dosimetric characteristics of Siemens virtual and physical wedges for ONCOR linear accelerator.

Authors:  Ehab M Attalla; H S Abo-Elenein; H Ammar; Ismail El-Desoky
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2010-07

5.  The accuracy of dynamic wedge dose computation in the ADAC Pinnacle RTP system.

Authors:  H Shao; X Wu; C Luo; A Crooks; A Bernstein; A Markoe
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Enhanced dynamic wedge factors at off-axis points in asymmetric fields.

Authors:  K L Prado; S M Kirsner; R J Kudchadker; R E Steadham; R G Lane
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Enhanced dynamic wedge output factors for Varian 2300CD and the case for a reference database.

Authors:  Christopher F Njeh
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  A spreadsheet solution for off-axis, noncentral enhanced dynamic wedge factors.

Authors:  B D Wichman
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.