Literature DB >> 9472821

Electron contamination in 8 and 18 MV photon beams.

T C Zhu1, J R Palta.   

Abstract

The contribution from contaminant electrons in the buildup region of a photon beam must be separated when calculating the dose using a photon convolution kernel. Their contribution can be extrapolated from fractional depth dose (FDD) data using the fractional depth kerma (or the "equilibrium dose") derived from measured quantities such as beam attenuation with depth, phantom scatter factor as a function of field size and depth, and inverse-square law for the incident photon beam. Good agreement is observed between the extrapolated and the EGS4 Monte Carlo simulated, primary dose-to-kerma ratios in the surface region for the photon beams, excluding electron contamination. The FDD was measured using a Scanditronix photon diode and was normalized to a reference depth far beyond maximum range of contaminant electrons. An analysis for the 8 and 18 MV photon beams from a Varian 2100CD indicates that at a source-to-surface distance (SSD) of 100 cm, the maximum electron contaminant dose (relative to its maximum FDD) varies from 1% to 33% for 8 MV and 2% to 44% for 18 MV, for square collimator settings ranging from 5 to 40 cm (defined at 100 cm from the source). This value at a depth of maximum dose (2 cm for 8 MV and 3.5 cm for 18 MV) can reach 1% for 8 MV and 2.3% for 18 MV. This contaminant electron dose is almost independent of SSD for 8 MV and starts to fall off for 18 MV at SSDs larger than 120 cm. Compared with the open beam, the contaminant electron dose increases when a solid tray is used, and the magnitude of increase increases with field size, reaching 19% and 16% for a 40 x 40 cm2 field for 8 and 18 MV photons, respectively. The contaminant electron dose increases slightly for a blocked beam compared with an open beam of the same field size if a tray is used in both cases. The contaminant electron dose for the wedged field is less than that for an open field. However, the reduction is less significant at larger collimator settings (c = 20 cm) and may increase slightly for 8 MV photons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9472821     DOI: 10.1118/1.598169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

1.  Dose discrepancies in the buildup region and their impact on dose calculations for IMRT fields.

Authors:  Shu-Hui Hsu; Jean M Moran; Yu Chen; Ravi Kulasekere; Peter L Roberson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Verification of IMRT dose calculations using AAA and PBC algorithms in dose buildup regions.

Authors:  Arun S Oinam; Lakhwant Singh
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation in the build-up region of the tangential field of the breast for a radiotherapy treatment planning system.

Authors:  Bagher Farhood; Mohammad Taghi Bahreyni Toossi; Shokouhozaman Soleymanifard; Tohid Mortezazadeh
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2017-09-29

4.  Measurement of skin surface dose distributions in radiation therapy using poly(vinyl alcohol) cryogel dosimeters.

Authors:  Molham M Eyadeh; Marcin Wierzbicki; Kevin R Diamond
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Magnetic field dose effects on different radiation beam geometries for hypofractionated partial breast irradiation.

Authors:  Anthony Kim; Stephanie Lim-Reinders; Claire McCann; Syed Bilal Ahmad; Arjun Sahgal; Justin Lee; Brian M Keller
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.