Literature DB >> 9472577

The techniques of nonmuscular closure of hypopharyngeal defect following total laryngectomy: the assessment of complication and pharyngoesophageal segment.

C P Wang1, T C Tseng, R C Lee, S Y Chang.   

Abstract

The usual method of reconstructing a hypopharyngeal defect during total laryngectomy includes pharyngeal muscle layer closure, which may result in high pharyngoesophageal pressure. We hypothesize that nonclosure of the pharyngeal muscle can reduce the pressure of the pharyngoesophageal segment which can reduce the chances of the formation of pharyngocutaneous fistulae. A technique of nonmuscular closure of a hypopharyngeal defect is presented. The differences in the rate of fistula formation and swallowing function between patients with usual and nonmuscular closure were also studied. Sixty consecutive laryngectomees were enrolled in this study. Thirty patients received usual closure after total laryngectomy, whereas the other 30 patients underwent non closure of their pharyngeal muscles. One patient (3.3 per cent) in the nonmuscular closure group and three patients (10 per cent) in the usual closure group developed a pharyngocutaneous fistula. The pharyngoesophageal pressures of the nonmuscular closure group were significantly lower than those of the usual closure group. We conclude that the technique of nonclosure of the pharyngeal constrictor muscle after total laryngectomy is relatively more simple and is not associated with a higher rate of fistula formation. Furthermore, nonclosure of the pharyngeal constrictor muscle is preferable to muscular closure because it reduces the spasm of the pharyngoesophageal segment which limits voice rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9472577     DOI: 10.1017/s0022215100139337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  6 in total

1.  A Comparative Study of Pharyngeal Repair in Two Layers Versus Three Layers, Following Total Laryngectomy in Carcinoma of Larynx.

Authors:  Asok K Saha; Saikat Samaddar; Avijit Choudhury; Abir Chaudhury; Nirmalya Roy
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-03-09

2.  Linear stapler closure of the pharynx during total laryngectomy: a 15-year experience (from closed technique to semi-closed technique).

Authors:  G Altissimi; A Frenguelli
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 3.  Evidence and evidence gaps of laryngeal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Susanne Wiegand
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-12-15

Review 4.  Incidence of Pharyngocutaneous Fistula After Total Laryngectomy and Its Relationship With the Shapes of Mucosa Closure: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Adit Chotipanich; Sombat Wongmanee
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-06

5.  Multivariate analysis of risk factors for pharyngocutaneous fistula after total laryngectomy.

Authors:  Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo; Giuseppe De Cillis; Carlo Marchiori; Silvia Carpenè; Maria Cristina Da Mosto
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 3.236

6.  The prognostic value of abnormal findings on radiographic swallowing studies after total laryngectomy.

Authors:  R F D van la Parra; M Kon; P P A Schellekens; W W Braunius; F A Pameijer
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 3.909

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.