Literature DB >> 9471965

Factors affecting lactate and malate utilization by Selenomonas ruminantium.

J D Evans1, S A Martin.   

Abstract

Lactate utilization by Selenomonas ruminantium is stimulated in the presence of malate. Because little information is available describing lactate-plus-malate utilization by this organism, the objective of this study was to evaluate factors affecting utilization of these two organic acids by two strains of S. ruminantium. When S. ruminantium HD4 and H18 were grown in batch culture on DL-lactate and DL-malate, both strains coutilized both organic acids for the initial 20 to 24 h of incubation and acetate, propionate, and succinate accumulated. However, when malate and succinate concentrations reached 7 mM, malate utilization ceased, and with strain H18, there was a complete cessation of DL-lactate utilization. Malate utilization by both strains was also inhibited in the presence of glucose. S. ruminantium HD4 was unable to grow on 6 mM DL-lactate at extracellular pH 5.5 in continuous culture (dilution rate, 0.05 h-1) and washed out of the culture vessel. Addition of 8 mM DL-malate to the medium prevented washout on 6 mM DL-lactate at pH 5.5 and resulted in succinate accumulation. Addition of malate also increased bacterial protein, acetate, and propionate concentrations in continuous culture. These results suggest that 8 mM DL-malate enhances the ability of strain HD4 to grow on 6 mM DL-lactate at extracellular pH 5.5.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9471965      PMCID: PMC168811          DOI: 10.1128/aem.63.12.4853-4858.1997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  25 in total

1.  A Dicarboxyclic acid transport system in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Om K. Ghei; William W. Kay
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1972-02-01       Impact factor: 4.124

2.  Malate content of forage varieties commonly fed to cattle.

Authors:  T R Callaway; S A Martin; J L Wampler; N S Hill; G M Hill
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 3.  Effect of ionophores on ruminal fermentation.

Authors:  J B Russell; H J Strobel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Succinate transport by a ruminal selenomonad and its regulation by carbohydrate availability and osmotic strength.

Authors:  H J Strobel; J B Russell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Role of Megasphaera elsdenii in the Fermentation of dl-[2-C]lactate in the Rumen of Dairy Cattle.

Authors:  G H Counotte; R A Prins; R H Janssen; M J Debie
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Influence of acidosis on rumen function.

Authors:  L L Slyter
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Medium without rumen fluid for nonselective enumeration and isolation of rumen bacteria.

Authors:  D R Caldwell; M P Bryant
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1966-09

8.  Control of lactate production by Selenomonas ruminantium: homotropic activation of lactate dehydrogenase by pyruvate.

Authors:  R J Wallace
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1978-07

9.  Effect of malate on in vitro mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation.

Authors:  S A Martin; M N Streeter
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Pathway and sites for energy conservation in the metabolism of glucose by Selenomonas ruminantium.

Authors:  S B Melville; T A Michel; J M Macy
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  5 in total

1.  Differences in the Composition of the Rumen Microbiota of Finishing Beef Cattle Divergently Ranked for Residual Methane Emissions.

Authors:  Paul E Smith; Alan K Kelly; David A Kenny; Sinéad M Waters
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 6.064

2.  Functional and phylogenetic analyses of camel rumen microbiota associated with different lignocellulosic substrates.

Authors:  Javad Gharechahi; Sajjad Sarikhan; Jian-Lin Han; Xue-Zhi Ding; Ghasem Hosseini Salekdeh
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 8.462

3.  Development of a rational framework for the therapeutic efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation for calf diarrhea treatment.

Authors:  Jahidul Islam; Masae Tanimizu; Yu Shimizu; Yoshiaki Goto; Natsuki Ohtani; Kentaro Sugiyama; Eriko Tatezaki; Masumi Sato; Eiji Makino; Toru Shimada; Chise Ueda; Ayumi Matsuo; Yoshihisa Suyama; Yoshifumi Sakai; Mutsumi Furukawa; Katsuki Usami; Hiroshi Yoneyama; Hisashi Aso; Hidekazu Tanaka; Tomonori Nochi
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 14.650

4.  Illumina MiSeq Phylogenetic Amplicon Sequencing Shows a Large Reduction of an Uncharacterised Succinivibrionaceae and an Increase of the Methanobrevibacter gottschalkii Clade in Feed Restricted Cattle.

Authors:  Matthew Sean McCabe; Paul Cormican; Kate Keogh; Aaron O'Connor; Eoin O'Hara; Rafael Alejandro Palladino; David Anthony Kenny; Sinéad Mary Waters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Gossypol Exhibited Higher Detrimental Effect on Ruminal Fermentation Characteristics of Low-Forage in Comparison with High-Forage Mixed Feeds.

Authors:  Wei-Kang Wang; Yan-Lu Wang; Wen-Juan Li; Qi-Chao Wu; Sheng-Li Li; Hong-Jian Yang
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-03-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.