Literature DB >> 9471100

Head registration techniques for image-guided surgery.

M S Alp1, M Dujovny, M Misra, F T Charbel, J I Ausman.   

Abstract

Localization of the pathological structures in relation to the surrounding anatomy and understanding of the surgical anatomy are probably the most important keys to successful neurosurgery. Image-guided surgery is an important tool for understanding an individual's anatomy and for precisely locating the lesion. Head registration is the most important step in image-guided surgery, required by every system in use today, although these systems show great differences. In this study, head registration techniques and user algorithms in 83 image-guided surgery cases were analyzed. Several types of fiducials including skin markers, bone fiducials, and the stereotactic frame were used for registration. Clinical applications, ease of use, and computer-calculated accuracy values for each type were compared. The average accuracy was 1.50 mm. X-spot skin markers are the fiducials most commonly used with CT scan. The stereotactic frame was the most accurate method, with an accuracy of 0.69 mm. Disc-shaped fiducials were used when MRI was the imaging modality; they provided an average accuracy of 2.62 mm. Head registration is an important part of image-guided surgery; the procedure used for registration should be based on the requirements of each individual case. Our results indicated that the stereotactic frame is the most accurate method of registration; however, skin markers provide reasonable accuracy with significant ease of use and patient comfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9471100     DOI: 10.1080/01616412.1998.11740481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Res        ISSN: 0161-6412            Impact factor:   2.448


  6 in total

1.  Navigational maxillofacial surgery using virtual models.

Authors:  B Hohlweg-Majert; Ralf Schön; Rainer Schmelzeisen; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Alexander Schramm
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Comparative study of application accuracy of two frameless neuronavigation systems: experimental error assessment quantifying registration methods and clinically influencing factors.

Authors:  Dimitrios Paraskevopoulos; Andreas Unterberg; Roland Metzner; Jens Dreyhaupt; Georg Eggers; Christian Rainer Wirtz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  [Deep brain stimulation using simultaneous stereotactic electrode placement: an alternative to conventional functional stereotaxy?].

Authors:  C Matzke; N Hammer; D Weise; D Lindner; D Fritzsch; J Classen; J Meixensberger; D Winkler
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.214

4.  Comparison of registration accuracy of skin- and bone-implanted fiducials for frameless stereotaxis of the brain: a prospective study.

Authors:  Mario Ammirati; Jeffrey D Gross; Giuseppe Ammirati; Sharon Dugan
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2002-08

5.  Image-guided surgery and medical robotics in the cranial area.

Authors:  G Widmann
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2007-01-01

6.  How precise are oral splints for frameless stereotaxy in guided ear, nose, throat, and maxillofacial surgery: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Manfred Nilius; Minou Hélène Nilius
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2021-06-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.