Literature DB >> 9469272

Follow-up of patients with low back pain during pregnancy.

J Brynhildsen1, A Hansson, A Persson, M Hammar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the long-term risk for low back pain among women with previous severe low back pain during pregnancy.
METHODS: In a previous prospective study, 79 pregnant women developed low back pain severe enough to require sick leave. Twelve years later a questionnaire was sent to 62 of these women and 84 controls who did not develop severe low back pain during pregnancy. The questionnaire asked about occupation, low back pain in general and during later pregnancies, and sick leave due to low back pain. There were also questions regarding use of oral contraceptives and its possible relation to low back pain.
RESULTS: The response rate was 84% in the back pain group and 80% among controls. The two groups were similar according to the percentage of women having had another pregnancy (33 of 52 [63%] versus 39 of 67 [58%]) but ten (19%) of the women with previous low back pain stated they had refrained from another pregnancy because of their fear of low back pain compared with only one control. Almost all women (31 of 33) with previous severe low back pain experienced the same symptoms in a subsequent pregnancy, compared with 17 of 39 (44%) controls. Even when they were not pregnant, women with previous low back pain suffered more often and used more sick leave due to low back pain (44 of 52 versus 43 of 67, chi2 = 5.68, P < .05). The location (sacroiliac joint or lumbar affection) of the previous low back pain did not affect the long-term prognosis. In a logistic regression model, previous low back pain during pregnancy was the only independent risk factor for low back pain during a subsequent pregnancy, whereas an occupation involving physical demand did not affect the results. However, together with previous low back pain during pregnancy, heavy occupation increased the risk for current nonpregnant low back pain.
CONCLUSION: Women with severe low back pain during pregnancy have an extremely high risk for experiencing a new episode of severe low back pain during another pregnancy and when not pregnant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9469272     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00630-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  17 in total

1.  Back pain/discomfort in pregnancy: invisible and forgotten.

Authors:  C J Greenwood; M C Stainton
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2001

2.  Auricular acupuncture as a treatment for pregnant women who have low back and posterior pelvic pain: a pilot study.

Authors:  Shu-Ming Wang; Peggy Dezinno; Eric C Lin; Haiqun Lin; James J Yue; Michael R Berman; Ferne Braveman; Zeev N Kain
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Predictors for long-term disability in women with persistent postpartum pelvic girdle pain.

Authors:  Jenny Sjödahl; Annelie Gutke; Birgitta Öberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Impact of postpartum lumbopelvic pain on disability, pain intensity, health-related quality of life, activity level, kinesiophobia, and depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Annelie Gutke; Mari Lundberg; Hans Christian Östgaard; Birgitta Öberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The association between pelvic girdle pain and pelvic floor muscle function in pregnancy.

Authors:  Colleen M Fitzgerald; Trudy Mallinson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Back pain in pregnancy: 1-year follow-up of untreated cases.

Authors:  L Padua; P Caliandro; I Aprile; C Pazzaglia; R Padua; A Calistri; P Tonali
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: Terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence.

Authors:  W H Wu; O G Meijer; K Uegaki; J M A Mens; J H van Dieën; P I J M Wuisman; H C Ostgaard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Conservative management of groin pain during pregnancy: a descriptive case study.

Authors:  Deborah Ducar; Clayton D Skaggs
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2005

9.  Self-administered tests as a screening procedure for pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain.

Authors:  Monika Fagevik Olsén; Annelie Gutke; Helen Elden; Charlotte Nordenman; Lina Fabricius; Melissa Gravesen; Anette Lind; Gunilla Kjellby-Wendt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Persistence of back pain symptoms after pregnancy and bone mineral density changes as measured by quantitative ultrasound--a two year longitudinal follow up study.

Authors:  William Wk To; Margaret Wn Wong
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.