Literature DB >> 9467780

Force production in the primate masticatory system: electromyographic tests of biomechanical hypotheses.

M A Spencer1.   

Abstract

Studies of the influence of dietary selection pressures in living and extinct primate taxa frequently interpret cranial diversity using a simple lever model. When this model is applied to functional or evolutionary questions, it is commonly assumed that the muscles of mastication vary little in activity during biting at points along the tooth row. A pattern of smoothly increasing maximum bite force magnitudes is therefore predicted as the bite point is moved posteriorly along the dental arcade. Diverse adaptive explanations are mapped onto this pattern. In this study, the activity of the superficial masseter and anterior temporalis muscles in humans was quantified during high magnitude bite force production at points along the tooth row. These data indicate that there are substantial changes in muscle activity with bite point, and that the standard lever model is therefore an incomplete description of masticatory force production. Maximum muscle force magnitudes were found to be greatest during first molar biting and to decrease as the bite point moved anteriorly and posteriorly. Additionally, relative balancing and working side muscle activity changed by bite point. This latter pattern is consistent with the predictions of Greaves' constrained lever model, which assumes that masticatory muscle activity is restricted by the need to maintain compressive forces at both temporomandibular joints. However, these results also imply that additional factors influence muscle activity--such as dental morphology, mandibular kinematics, and the need to safeguard against joint distraction during diverse loading conditions--and that the constrained lever model of Greaves is therefore also incomplete. These considerations suggest that masticatory system morphology in primates will respond differently to dietary selection pressures than is commonly hypothesized. Intepretations of cranial morphology in fossil taxa may therefore also differ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9467780     DOI: 10.1006/jhev.1997.0180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  19 in total

1.  Response of human jaw muscles to axial stimulation of a molar tooth.

Authors:  Russell S A Brinkworth; Courtney Male; Kemal S Türker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Masticatory loadings and cranial deformation in Macaca fascicularis: a finite element analysis sensitivity study.

Authors:  L C Fitton; J F Shi; M J Fagan; P O'Higgins
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  Craniofacial biomechanics: an overview of recent multibody modelling studies.

Authors:  Neil Curtis
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Predicting muscle activation patterns from motion and anatomy: modelling the skull of Sphenodon (Diapsida: Rhynchocephalia).

Authors:  Neil Curtis; Marc E H Jones; Susan E Evans; JunFen Shi; Paul O'Higgins; Michael J Fagan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  A simple rule governs the evolution and development of hominin tooth size.

Authors:  Alistair R Evans; E Susanne Daly; Kierstin K Catlett; Kathleen S Paul; Stephen J King; Matthew M Skinner; Hans P Nesse; Jean-Jacques Hublin; Grant C Townsend; Gary T Schwartz; Jukka Jernvall
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Modeling the biomechanics of articular eminence function in anthropoid primates.

Authors:  Claire E Terhune
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  The feeding biomechanics and dietary ecology of Paranthropus boisei.

Authors:  Amanda L Smith; Stefano Benazzi; Justin A Ledogar; Kelli Tamvada; Leslie C Pryor Smith; Gerhard W Weber; Mark A Spencer; Peter W Lucas; Shaji Michael; Ali Shekeban; Khaled Al-Fadhalah; Abdulwahab S Almusallam; Paul C Dechow; Ian R Grosse; Callum F Ross; Richard H Madden; Brian G Richmond; Barth W Wright; Qian Wang; Craig Byron; Dennis E Slice; Sarah Wood; Christine Dzialo; Michael A Berthaume; Adam van Casteren; David S Strait
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  Sutural growth restriction and modern human facial evolution: an experimental study in a pig model.

Authors:  Nathan E Holton; Robert G Franciscus; Mary Ann Nieves; Steven D Marshall; Steven B Reimer; Thomas E Southard; John C Keller; Scott D Maddux
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  The effect of dietary adaption on cranial morphological integration in capuchins (order Primates, genus Cebus).

Authors:  Jana Makedonska; Barth W Wright; David S Strait
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Anatomical Correlates to Nectar Feeding among the Strepsirrhines of Madagascar: Implications for Interpreting the Fossil Record.

Authors:  Magdalena N Muchlinski; Jonathan M G Perry
Journal:  Anat Res Int       Date:  2011-10-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.