Literature DB >> 19929910

Sutural growth restriction and modern human facial evolution: an experimental study in a pig model.

Nathan E Holton1, Robert G Franciscus, Mary Ann Nieves, Steven D Marshall, Steven B Reimer, Thomas E Southard, John C Keller, Scott D Maddux.   

Abstract

Facial size reduction and facial retraction are key features that distinguish modern humans from archaic Homo. In order to more fully understand the emergence of modern human craniofacial form, it is necessary to understand the underlying evolutionary basis for these defining characteristics. Although it is well established that the cranial base exerts considerable influence on the evolutionary and ontogenetic development of facial form, less emphasis has been placed on developmental factors intrinsic to the facial skeleton proper. The present analysis was designed to assess anteroposterior facial reduction in a pig model and to examine the potential role that this dynamic has played in the evolution of modern human facial form. Ten female sibship cohorts, each consisting of three individuals, were allocated to one of three groups. In the experimental group (n = 10), microplates were affixed bilaterally across the zygomaticomaxillary and frontonasomaxillary sutures at 2 months of age. The sham group (n = 10) received only screw implantation and the controls (n = 10) underwent no surgery. Following 4 months of post-surgical growth, we assessed variation in facial form using linear measurements and principal components analysis of Procrustes scaled landmarks. There were no differences between the control and sham groups; however, the experimental group exhibited a highly significant reduction in facial projection and overall size. These changes were associated with significant differences in the infraorbital region of the experimental group including the presence of an infraorbital depression and an inferiorly and coronally oriented infraorbital plane in contrast to a flat, superiorly and sagittally infraorbital plane in the control and sham groups. These altered configurations are markedly similar to important additional facial features that differentiate modern humans from archaic Homo, and suggest that facial length restriction via rigid plate fixation is a potentially useful model to assess the developmental factors that underlie changing patterns in craniofacial form associated with the emergence of modern humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19929910      PMCID: PMC2807975          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01162.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  90 in total

1.  A comparative study of stereolithographically modelled skulls of Petralona and Broken Hill: implications for future studies of middle Pleistocene hominid evolution.

Authors:  H Seidler; D Falk; C Stringer; H Wilfing; G B Müller; D zur Nedden; G W Weber; W Reicheis; J L Arsuaga
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.895

2.  Facial variations related to headform type.

Authors:  M Bhat; D H Enlow
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  A classification of skeletal facial types.

Authors:  V Sassouni
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1969-02

4.  The role of function in the formation of the skull.

Authors:  G H Schumacher; D Ivánkievicz; J Fanghänel
Journal:  Acta Morphol Acad Sci Hung       Date:  1979

5.  Neanderthal cranial ontogeny and its implications for late hominid diversity.

Authors:  M S Ponce de León; C P Zollikofer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Influence of masticatory muscle function on transverse skull dimensions in the growing rat.

Authors:  Christos Katsaros; Rolf Berg; Stavros Kiliaridis
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 7.  Sutural biology and the correlates of craniosynostosis.

Authors:  M M Cohen
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1993-10-01

8.  Effect of soft diets on craniofacial growth in mice.

Authors:  G Ito; S Mitani; J H Kim
Journal:  Anat Anz       Date:  1988

9.  Allometric scaling of infraorbital surface topography in Homo.

Authors:  Scott D Maddux; Robert G Franciscus
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 3.895

10.  Petrosal orientation and mandibular ramus breadth: evidence for an integrated petroso-mandibular developmental unit.

Authors:  Markus Bastir; Antonio Rosas; Kazuto Kuroe
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.868

View more
  6 in total

1.  Ancillary procedures necessary for translational research in experimental craniomaxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Mohammed Al-Rakan; Jaimie T Shores; Steve Bonawitz; Gabriel Santiago; Joani M Christensen; Gerald Grant; Ryan J Murphy; Ehsan Basafa; Mehran Armand; Pete Otovic; Sue Eller; Gerald Brandacher; Chad R Gordon
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Morphological integration between the cranial base and the face in children and adults.

Authors:  Nikolaos Gkantidis; Demetrios J Halazonetis
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Anatomical and immunohistochemical analyses of the fusion of the premaxillary-maxillary suture in human fetuses.

Authors:  Ling Zhu; Wen-Hua Ruan; Wu-Qun Han; Wei-Zhong Gu
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Nasal septal and craniofacial form in European- and African-derived populations.

Authors:  Nathan E Holton; Todd R Yokley; Aaron Figueroa
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Postnatal changes in the growth dynamics of the human face revealed from bone modelling patterns.

Authors:  Cayetana Martinez-Maza; Antonio Rosas; Manuel Nieto-Díaz
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Human feeding biomechanics: performance, variation, and functional constraints.

Authors:  Justin A Ledogar; Paul C Dechow; Qian Wang; Poorva H Gharpure; Adam D Gordon; Karen L Baab; Amanda L Smith; Gerhard W Weber; Ian R Grosse; Callum F Ross; Brian G Richmond; Barth W Wright; Craig Byron; Stephen Wroe; David S Strait
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.