Literature DB >> 9467075

A-bomb data: detection of bias in the Life Span Study cohort.

A Stewart1.   

Abstract

By drawing a distinction between A-bomb survivors with and without bomb-related injuries, it was possible to see that instead of the Life Span Study (LSS) cohort being a normal, homogenous population, there were significant differences between survivors with and without multiple injuries, and that these differences occurred largely among survivors who were under 10 or over 50 years of age when exposed. There also was a concentration of A-bomb-related injuries among survivors who eventually developed leukemia. So it is possible that deaths before 1950 had left the LSS cohort permanently biased in favor of persons who had high levels of resistance to all (early and late) effects of radiation. It is also possible that the high proportion of leukemia cases among the deaths of A-bomb survivors from 1950 to 1970 were because the radiation caused an initial leukocytosis followed by loss of immunologic competence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9467075      PMCID: PMC1469934          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.97105s61519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  5 in total

Review 1.  Relative sensitivity of myeloid and lymphatic stem cells to mutational and cell killing effects of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  A Stewart
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.156

2.  A-bomb survivors: further evidence of late effects of early deaths.

Authors:  A M Stewart; G W Kneale
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, Part I. Cancer: 1950-1990.

Authors:  D A Pierce; Y Shimizu; D L Preston; M Vaeth; K Mabuchi
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  A-bomb radiation and evidence of late effects other than cancer.

Authors:  A M Stewart; G W Kneale
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  Factors affecting recognition of cancer risks of nuclear workers.

Authors:  G W Kneale; A M Stewart
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.402

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Is it really this simple?

Authors:  Martin Charron; Brian C Lentle
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2003-09-16

2.  Possible selection effects for radiation risk estimates in Japanese A-bomb survivors: reanalysis of acute radiation symptoms data.

Authors:  Nezahat Hunter; Colin R Muirhead; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 3.  The risk linked to ionizing radiation: an alternative epidemiologic approach.

Authors:  C de Brouwer; R Lagasse
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 4.  A Brief Overview of Radiation-Induced Effects on Spermatogenesis and Oncofertility.

Authors:  Hisanori Fukunaga; Akinari Yokoya; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.