Literature DB >> 9467052

Health concerns related to radiation exposure of the female nuclear medicine patient.

M G Stabin1.   

Abstract

The female nuclear medicine patient is of special concern in evaluating radiation dose and risk in nuclear medicine. The female's overall body size and organ sizes generally are smaller than those of her male counterpart (thus her radiation doses will be higher, given the same amounts of administered activity and similar biokinetics); female gonads are inside the body instead of outside and are near several organs often important as source organs in internal dosimetry (urinary bladder, liver, kidneys, intestines); risk of breast cancer is significantly higher among females than males; and in the case of pregnancy, exposure to radiation of the embryo/fetus and the nursing infant are of special concern in such an analysis. All these concerns are addressed in this study through a comparative study of radiation doses for males and females over a large number (approximately 60) of nuclear medicine studies and through a study of what is known about radiation dosimetry in pregnancy and breast feeding. It was found that women's critical organ doses and effective doses (as defined by the International Commission on Radiological Protection 60 [ICRP 60] are about 25% higher than those for men across all these studies. Women's gonad doses, however, may be as much as 10 to 30 times higher than those in men, although 2- to 3-fold differences are common. Many radiopharmaceuticals are administered to women of childbearing age; however, little is known about how much activity crosses the placenta and about the biokinetics in the fetus should it occur. Nonetheless, dose estimates are provided at four stages of pregnancy (early, 3-month, 6-month, and 9-month gestation) for a large number of radiopharmaceuticals, whether or not quantitative estimates of placental crossover can be made. Many radiopharmaceuticals are also excreted in breast milk of nursing mothers. Breast feeding interruption schedules are suggested through analysis of the observed kinetics of these pharmaceuticals and an assumed dose limit of 1 mSv (effective dose equivalent) to the infant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9467052      PMCID: PMC1469927          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.97105s61403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  2 in total

1.  MIRDOSE: personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine.

Authors:  M G Stabin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Radiation absorbed dose to the embryo/fetus from radiopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  J R Russell; M G Stabin; R B Sparks; E Watson
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.316

  2 in total
  9 in total

1.  Specific absorbed fractions for internal electron emitters derived for a set of anatomically realistic reference pregnant female models.

Authors:  Bingqi Guo; X George Xu; Chengyu Shi
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 0.972

2.  Evaluation of [131I]I- and [177Lu]Lu-DTPA-A11 Minibody for Radioimmunotherapy in a Preclinical Model of PSCA-Expressing Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Wen-Ting K Tsai; Kirstin A Zettlitz; Magnus Dahlbom; Robert E Reiter; Anna M Wu
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Evaluation of radiation dose among patients admitted through a university hospital emergency department.

Authors:  Kevin S Baker; Mohammed Bilal Shaikh; Elaine S Gould; Jie Yang; Jiansong Chen; Michael Bonvento
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2012-06-15

Review 4.  Mechanisms underlying Children's susceptibility to environmental toxicants.

Authors:  E M Faustman; S M Silbernagel; R A Fenske; T M Burbacher; R A Ponce
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  A feasibility study of the therapeutic application of a mixture of 67/64 Cu radioisotopes produced by cyclotrons with proton irradiation.

Authors:  Laura De Nardo; Gaia Pupillo; Liliana Mou; Juan Esposito; Antonio Rosato; Laura Meléndez-Alafort
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 4.506

6.  2009 EANM parathyroid guidelines.

Authors:  Elif Hindié; Omer Ugur; David Fuster; Michael O'Doherty; Gaia Grassetto; Pablo Ureña; Andrew Kettle; Seza A Gulec; Francesca Pons; Domenico Rubello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Evaluation of effective dose for a patient under Ga-67 nuclear examination using TLD, water phantom and a simplified model.

Authors:  Kuang Hua Chu; Yu Ting Lin; Chia Chun Hsu; Chien Yi Chen; Lung Kwang Pan
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Radiation Levels from Toilets Used By Patients Injected with 99mTc-based Radiopharmaceuticals in Ibadan.

Authors:  John Enyi Ejeh; Tolulope Hadrat Abiodun; Kayode Solomon Adedapo; Yetunde Ajoke Onimode; Olusegun Akinwale Ayeni
Journal:  Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther       Date:  2014-06-05

9.  Estimation of radiation dose to patients from (18) FDG whole body PET/CT investigations using dynamic PET scan protocol.

Authors:  Aruna Kaushik; Abhinav Jaimini; Madhavi Tripathi; Maria D'Souza; Rajnish Sharma; Anupam Mondal; Anil K Mishra; Bilikere S Dwarakanath
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.375

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.