Wen-Ting K Tsai1,2, Kirstin A Zettlitz1,3, Magnus Dahlbom4, Robert E Reiter5, Anna M Wu6,7. 1. Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, Crump Institute for Molecular Imaging, David Geffen School of Medicine, UC Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 2. Antibody Engineering, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA. 4. Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, David Geffen School of Medicine, UC Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 5. Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UC Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 6. Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, Crump Institute for Molecular Imaging, David Geffen School of Medicine, UC Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. awu@coh.org. 7. Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA. awu@coh.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Radioimmunotherapy uses tumor-specific antibodies to deliver therapeutic radionuclides, but hematological toxicity due to the long serum half-life of intact antibodies remains a challenge. We evaluated a smaller antibody fragment, the minibody, with faster kinetics and a potentially improved therapeutic index. PROCEDURES: The anti-prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) minibody (A11 Mb) was radiolabeled with iodine-124 ([124I]I-A11 Mb) or conjugated with deferoxamine (DFO) and labeled with zirconium-89 ([89Zr]Zr-DFO-A11 Mb) for surrogate immunoPET to profile pharmacokinetics in a human prostate cancer xenograft model. Subsequently, minibodies labeled with two therapeutic beta emitters, directly iodinated [131I]I-A11 Mb (non-residualizing) and 177Lu chelated using DTPA ([177Lu]Lu-DTPA-A11 Mb) (residualizing), were compared for in vitro antigen-specific cytotoxicity. Full biodistribution studies (in 22Rv1-PSCA tumor bearing and hPSCA knock-in mice) were conducted for dosimetry calculations. Finally, the lead candidate [131I]I-A11 Mb was evaluated in a radioimmunotherapy experiment. Escalating single doses (3.7, 11, or 37 MBq) and saline control were administered to 22Rv1-PSCA tumor bearing mice and anti-tumor effects (tumor volume) and toxicity (body weight) were monitored. RESULTS: Minibodies radiolabeled with therapeutic beta emitters [131I]I-A11 Mb and [177Lu]Lu-DTPA-A11 Mb exhibited comparable tumor cell growth inhibition in vitro. In vivo surrogate immunoPET imaging using [89Zr]Zr-DFO-A11 Mb showed activity retention in liver and kidney up to 72 h, while [124I]I-A11 Mb cleared from liver, kidney, and blood by 48 h. Based on full biodistribution and dosimetry calculations, administering 37 MBq [131I]I-A11 Mb was predicted to deliver a favorable dose to the tumor (35 Gy), with a therapeutic index of 22 (tumor:bone marrow). For [177Lu]Lu-DTPA-A11 Mb, the kidneys would be dose-limiting, and the maximum tolerated activity (7.4 MBq) was not predicted to deliver an effective radiation dose to tumor. Radioimmunotherapy with a single dose of [131I]I-A11 Mb showed dose-dependent tumor inhibition with minimal off-target toxicity and improved median survival (19 and 24 days, P < 0.001) compared with untreated mice (12 days). CONCLUSIONS: These findings show the potential of the anti-PSCA minibody for targeted radioimmunotherapy with minimal toxicity, and the application of immunoPET and dosimetry for personalized treatment.
PURPOSE: Radioimmunotherapy uses tumor-specific antibodies to deliver therapeutic radionuclides, but hematological toxicity due to the long serum half-life of intact antibodies remains a challenge. We evaluated a smaller antibody fragment, the minibody, with faster kinetics and a potentially improved therapeutic index. PROCEDURES: The anti-prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) minibody (A11 Mb) was radiolabeled with iodine-124 ([124I]I-A11 Mb) or conjugated with deferoxamine (DFO) and labeled with zirconium-89 ([89Zr]Zr-DFO-A11 Mb) for surrogate immunoPET to profile pharmacokinetics in a humanprostate cancer xenograft model. Subsequently, minibodies labeled with two therapeutic beta emitters, directly iodinated [131I]I-A11 Mb (non-residualizing) and 177Lu chelated using DTPA ([177Lu]Lu-DTPA-A11 Mb) (residualizing), were compared for in vitro antigen-specific cytotoxicity. Full biodistribution studies (in 22Rv1-PSCAtumor bearing and hPSCA knock-in mice) were conducted for dosimetry calculations. Finally, the lead candidate [131I]I-A11 Mb was evaluated in a radioimmunotherapy experiment. Escalating single doses (3.7, 11, or 37 MBq) and saline control were administered to 22Rv1-PSCAtumor bearing mice and anti-tumor effects (tumor volume) and toxicity (body weight) were monitored. RESULTS: Minibodies radiolabeled with therapeutic beta emitters [131I]I-A11 Mb and [177Lu]Lu-DTPA-A11 Mb exhibited comparable tumor cell growth inhibition in vitro. In vivo surrogate immunoPET imaging using [89Zr]Zr-DFO-A11 Mb showed activity retention in liver and kidney up to 72 h, while [124I]I-A11 Mb cleared from liver, kidney, and blood by 48 h. Based on full biodistribution and dosimetry calculations, administering 37 MBq [131I]I-A11 Mb was predicted to deliver a favorable dose to the tumor (35 Gy), with a therapeutic index of 22 (tumor:bone marrow). For [177Lu]Lu-DTPA-A11 Mb, the kidneys would be dose-limiting, and the maximum tolerated activity (7.4 MBq) was not predicted to deliver an effective radiation dose to tumor. Radioimmunotherapy with a single dose of [131I]I-A11 Mb showed dose-dependent tumor inhibition with minimal off-target toxicity and improved median survival (19 and 24 days, P < 0.001) compared with untreated mice (12 days). CONCLUSIONS: These findings show the potential of the anti-PSCA minibody for targeted radioimmunotherapy with minimal toxicity, and the application of immunoPET and dosimetry for personalized treatment.
Authors: Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Changxue Lu; Hao Wang; Brandon Luber; Mary Nakazawa; Jeffrey C Roeser; Yan Chen; Tabrez A Mohammad; Yidong Chen; Helen L Fedor; Tamara L Lotan; Qizhi Zheng; Angelo M De Marzo; John T Isaacs; William B Isaacs; Rosa Nadal; Channing J Paller; Samuel R Denmeade; Michael A Carducci; Mario A Eisenberger; Jun Luo Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-09-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Z Gu; G Thomas; J Yamashiro; I P Shintaku; F Dorey; A Raitano; O N Witte; J W Said; M Loda; R E Reiter Journal: Oncogene Date: 2000-03-02 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Kambiz Rahbar; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar; Clemens Kratochwil; Uwe Haberkorn; Michael Schäfers; Markus Essler; Richard P Baum; Harshad R Kulkarni; Matthias Schmidt; Alexander Drzezga; Peter Bartenstein; Andreas Pfestroff; Markus Luster; Ulf Lützen; Marlies Marx; Vikas Prasad; Winfried Brenner; Alexander Heinzel; Felix M Mottaghy; Juri Ruf; Philipp Tobias Meyer; Martin Heuschkel; Maria Eveslage; Martin Bögemann; Wolfgang Peter Fendler; Bernd Joachim Krause Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2016-10-20 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Jazmin Schwartz; John L Humm; Chaitanya R Divgi; Steven M Larson; Joseph A O'Donoghue Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-03-13 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Scott T Tagawa; Himisha Beltran; Shankar Vallabhajosula; Stanley J Goldsmith; Joseph Osborne; Dan Matulich; Kristen Petrillo; Sarojben Parmar; David M Nanus; Neil H Bander Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Scott T Tagawa; Matthew I Milowsky; Michael Morris; Shankar Vallabhajosula; Paul Christos; Naveed H Akhtar; Joseph Osborne; Stanley J Goldsmith; Steve Larson; Neeta Pandit Taskar; Howard I Scher; Neil H Bander; David M Nanus Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-05-28 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Tove Olafsen; Zhennan Gu; Mark A Sherman; Jeffrey V Leyton; Michael E Witkosky; John E Shively; Andrew A Raubitschek; Sherie L Morrison; Anna M Wu; Robert E Reiter Journal: J Immunother Date: 2007 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.456