Literature DB >> 9466399

Potent excitatory influence of prefrontal cortex activity on noradrenergic locus coeruleus neurons.

E Jodo1, C Chiang, G Aston-Jones.   

Abstract

An influence of the prefrontal cortex on noradrenergic locus coeruleus neurons would have profound implications for the function of the locus coeruleus system. Although the medial prefrontal cortex does not substantially innervate the core of the nucleus locus coeruleus, evidence indicates that the medial prefrontal cortex projects to regions containing locus coeruleus dendrites; indirect medial prefrontal cortex-locus coeruleus projections are also possible. Here, we examined influences of prefrontal cortex activity on locus coeruleus firing rates by activating or inactivating the medial prefrontal cortex while recording impulse activity of locus coeruleus neurons extracellularly in anaesthetized rats. Most of our electrical stimulation experiments were conducted in rats which underwent lesions of the ascending dorsal bundle of noradrenergic fibres from the locus coeruleus to eliminate locus coeruleus projections to the prefrontal cortex, because antidromic activation of locus coeruleus from the prefrontal cortex affects even non-driven locus coeruleus neurons through collaterals. Single pulse stimulation (1 mA, 0.3-0.5 ms) of the dorsomedial (frontal region 2) or prelimbic region of the medial prefrontal cortex synaptically activated 13/16 (81%) or 16/56 (29%) locus coeruleus neurons, respectively. Train stimulation (20 Hz for 0.5 s) synaptically activated greater percentages of locus coeruleus cells, 11/12 cells (92%) for the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, and 41/50 cells (82%) for the prelimbic cortex. No inhibitory responses in the locus coeruleus were obtained with dorsomedial prefrontal stimulation, and weak inhibition was found in 16% of locus coeruleus cells with prelimbic stimulation. Electrical stimulation of more lateral frontal cortex (Fr1 area) had no effects on locus coeruleus activity. Chemical stimulation of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex with L-glutamate (10 or 100 mM) or D,L-homocysteic acid (10 mM) phasically activated 15/26 (55%) locus coeruleus cells, and 15/68 cells (22%) with prelimbic stimulation; such activation was sometimes followed by long-lasting oscillatory activity. No locus coeruleus cells exhibited purely inhibitory responses with chemical stimulation of any prefrontal cortex site. Inactivation of the dorsomedial or prelimbic region of the prefrontal cortex with lidocaine microinjection (2%, 180 or 300 nl) reduced locus coeruleus firing rates in 6/10 (60%) or 7/19 (37%) locus coeruleus cells, respectively. In no case did lidocaine in any prefrontal cortex site activate a locus coeruleus neuron. These results indicate that the medial prefrontal cortex provides a potent excitatory influence on locus coeruleus neurons. The fact that inactivation of the medial prefrontal cortex suppressed locus coeruleus firing indicates that the medial prefrontal cortex also provides a resting tonic excitatory influence on locus coeruleus activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9466399     DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00372-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  88 in total

1.  Phasic activation of locus ceruleus neurons by the central nucleus of the amygdala.

Authors:  Sebastien Bouret; Adam Duvel; Selim Onat; Susan J Sara
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The influence of spike rate and stimulus duration on noradrenergic neurons.

Authors:  Eric Brown; Jeff Moehlis; Philip Holmes; Ed Clayton; Janusz Rajkowski; Gary Aston-Jones
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 3.  Adrenergic pharmacology and cognition: focus on the prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Brian P Ramos; Amy F T Arnsten
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 12.310

4.  Enhanced emotion-induced amnesia in borderline personality disorder.

Authors:  René Hurlemann; Barbara Hawellek; Wolfgang Maier; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 5.  Locus coeruleus-norepinephrine modulation of sensory processing and perception: A focused review.

Authors:  Jim McBurney-Lin; Ju Lu; Yi Zuo; Hongdian Yang
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Prefrontal/accumbal catecholamine system determines motivational salience attribution to both reward- and aversion-related stimuli.

Authors:  Rossella Ventura; Cristina Morrone; Stefano Puglisi-Allegra
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The effect of prefrontal stimulation on the firing of basal forebrain neurons in urethane anesthetized rat.

Authors:  Erika Gyengési; Laszlo Zaborszky; László Détári
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 8.  Modulators in concert for cognition: modulator interactions in the prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Lisa A Briand; Howard Gritton; William M Howe; Damon A Young; Martin Sarter
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 11.685

9.  Effects of Optogenetic inhibition of BLA on Sleep Brief Optogenetic Inhibition of the Basolateral Amygdala in Mice Alters Effects of Stressful Experiences on Rapid Eye Movement Sleep.

Authors:  Mayumi Machida; Laurie L Wellman; Mairen E Fitzpatrick Bs; Olga Hallum Bs; Amy M Sutton Bs; György Lonart; Larry D Sanford
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 5.849

10.  Methylphenidate and atomoxetine enhance sensory-evoked neuronal activity in the visual thalamus of male rats.

Authors:  Rachel L Navarra; Brian D Clark; Gerard A Zitnik; Barry D Waterhouse
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.