Literature DB >> 9465294

Comparative genome mapping: mouse and rat homologies revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

J M Scalzi1, J C Hozier.   

Abstract

Mouse and rat genome studies are vital to the use of rodents as models of biology and human genetic disease. In this study, comparative cytogenetic maps of individual homologous mouse (Mus musculus) and rat (Rattus norvegicus) chromosomal regions are presented as defined by cross-species fluorescence in situ hybridization. Such "Zoo-FISH" methods permit direct visual observation of the location of DNA segments from one species on mitotic chromosomes of evolutionarily diverged species. Mouse whole chromosome paint (WCP) probes generated from microdissection and degenerate oliogonucleotide primed (DOP) PCR were hybridized on slides containing a mixture of both mouse (the reference species) and rat (the diverged/ comparative species) metaphase chromosomes. Using six different mouse WCPs, eight regions on seven rat chromosomes were shown to be evolutionarily conserved between these species. The specific chromosomal sites of homology delineated in this study between mouse (MMU) and rat (RNO) genomes include the following: MMU 1 to RNO 9q21-q36 and to RNO 13 from bands q11 to the telomere, MMU 4 to all of RNO 5, MMU 11 to all of RNO 10 and the distal region of RNO 14 (14q21-q22), MMU 7 and MMU 19 both to RNO 1, from bands 1q21 to 41 (MMU 7) and 1q42 to the telomere (MMU 19), and MMU X to all of RNO X. Additionally, several new mouse and rat map assignments have been predicted based on the observed cross-species hybridization patterns in conjunction with known mapping data for mouse or rat genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9465294     DOI: 10.1006/geno.1997.5090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genomics        ISSN: 0888-7543            Impact factor:   5.736


  7 in total

Review 1.  Chromosomal evolution in Rodentia.

Authors:  S A Romanenko; P L Perelman; V A Trifonov; A S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Automated construction of high-density comparative maps between rat, human, and mouse.

Authors:  A E Kwitek; P J Tonellato; D Chen; J Gullings-Handley; Y S Cheng; S Twigger; T E Scheetz; T L Casavant; M Stoll; M A Nobrega; M Shiozawa; M B Soares; V C Sheffield; H J Jacob
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Phylogenetic origin of human chromosomes 7, 16, and 19 and their homologs in placental mammals.

Authors:  F Richard; M Lombard; B Dutrillaux
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Chromosome painting in the African four-striped mouse Rhabdomys pumilio: detection of possible murid specific contiguous segment combinations.

Authors:  R V Rambau; T J Robinson
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Vulnerability of white matter towards antenatal hypoxia is linked to a species-dependent regulation of glutamate receptor subunits.

Authors:  Romain H Fontaine; Paul Olivier; Véronique Massonneau; Philippe Leroux; Vincent Degos; Sophie Lebon; Vincent El Ghouzzi; Vincent Lelièvre; Pierre Gressens; Olivier Baud
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Construction of chromosome-specific paints for meta- and submetacentric autosomes and the sex chromosomes in the horse and their use to detect homologous chromosomal segments in the donkey.

Authors:  T Raudsepp; B P Chowdhary
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.620

7.  Comparative karyotype of rat and mouse using bidirectional chromosome painting.

Authors:  M N Guilly; P Fouchet; P de Chamisso; A Schmitz; B Dutrillaux
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.620

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.