Literature DB >> 9464889

National Beef Quality Audit-1995: survey of producer-related defects and carcass quality and quantity attributes.

S L Boleman1, S J Boleman, W W Morgan, D S Hale, D B Griffin, J W Savell, R P Ames, M T Smith, J D Tatum, T G Field, G C Smith, B A Gardner, J B Morgan, S L Northcutt, H G Dolezal, D R Gill, F K Ray.   

Abstract

The National Beef Quality Audit-1995 was conducted to evaluate the progress of the beef industry since the time of the National Beef Quality Audit-1991 in improving quality and consistency of beef. Nine plants were assigned for auditing to Colorado State University, Oklahoma State University, and Texas A&M University. Personnel from each institution visited three of their nine plants twice, once in the spring/summer and once in the fall/winter. Data were collected on 50% of each lot on the slaughter floor and 10% in the cooler during a single day's production (one or two shifts, as appropriate). Of the cattle audited on the slaughter floor, 47.7% had no brands, 3.0% had a shoulder brand, 16.8% had a side brand, 38.7% had a butt brand, and 6.2% had brands in multiple locations. Data revealed that 51.6% of the carcasses had no bruises, 30.9% had one bruise, 12.8% had two bruises, 3.7% had three bruises, .9% had four bruises, and .1% had more than four bruises. In addition, 7.2% of the bruises evaluated were located on the round, 41.1% were on the loin, 20.8% on the rib, and 30.8% on the chuck. Livers, lungs, tripe, heads, tongues, and whole carcasses were condemned at rates of 22.2, 5.0, 11.0, .9, 3.8, and .1%, respectively. Mean USDA yield grade and quality grade traits were as follows: USDA yield grade, 2.8; carcass weight, 338.4 kg; adjusted fat thickness, 1.2 cm; longissimus muscle area, 81.9 cm2; kidney, pelvic, and heart fat, 2.1%; USDA quality grade, High Select; overall maturity, A60; and marbling score, Small-minus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9464889     DOI: 10.2527/1998.76196x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of two alternate PGF2α products in two estrus synchronization protocols in beef heifers.

Authors:  Nicola Oosthuizen; Alicia C Lansford; Luara B Canal; Pedro L P Fontes; Carla D Sanford; Carl R Dahlen; Nicolas DiLorenzo; Rick N Funston; G Cliff Lamb
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Plant-based solutions for veterinary immunotherapeutics and prophylactics.

Authors:  Igor Kolotilin; Ed Topp; Eric Cox; Bert Devriendt; Udo Conrad; Jussi Joensuu; Eva Stöger; Heribert Warzecha; Tim McAllister; Andrew Potter; Michael D McLean; J Christopher Hall; Rima Menassa
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.683

3.  United States beef quality as chronicled by the National Beef Quality Audits, Beef Consumer Satisfaction Projects, and National Beef Tenderness Surveys - A review.

Authors:  John Michael Gonzalez; Kelsey Jean Phelps
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Influence of beef genotypes on animal performance, carcass traits, meat quality, and sensory characteristics in grazing or feedlot-finished steers.

Authors:  Isabella C F Maciel; J P Schweihofer; J I Fenton; J Hodbod; M G S McKendree; K Cassida; J E Rowntree
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-09-21

5.  Market weight, slaughter age, and yield grade to determine economic carcass traits and primal cuts yield of Hanwoo beef.

Authors:  Ki-Mun Kwon; Kim Margarette C Nogoy; Hwa-Eun Jeon; Seung-Ju Han; Hee-Chan Woo; Sung-Min Heo; Hyoung Ki Hong; Jae-Ik Lee; Dong Hoon Lee; Seong Ho Choi
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2022-01-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.