| Literature DB >> 35174349 |
Ki-Mun Kwon1, Kim Margarette C Nogoy2, Hwa-Eun Jeon1, Seung-Ju Han1, Hee-Chan Woo1, Sung-Min Heo1, Hyoung Ki Hong2, Jae-Ik Lee1,2, Dong Hoon Lee3, Seong Ho Choi2.
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the relationship among market weight, slaughter age, yield grade, and primal cut yield in Hanwoo. A total of 403 Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) was assessed for carcass traits such as carcass cold weight, backfat thickness, ribeye area, dressing percentage, yield index, and marbling score. The production yield of the individual major primal cuts of Hanwoo beef was also measured. Carcass cold weight, ribeye area, and backfat thickness, which affect meat quality increased with increased market weight (p < 0.05). The production yield of the ten major primal cuts also increased with increased market weight (p < 0.05). In terms of slaughter age, carcass cold weight, ribeye area, and backfat thickness all increased from 25 months to 28-29 months, and the production yield of all prime cuts also increased with increasing slaughter age. According to the meat yield grade, carcass cold weight and backfat thickness increased from grade A to grade C, although the ribeye area was not affected. The combined findings of the study suggest that slaughtering Hanwoo at the weight of 651-700 kg and 701-750 and age of 28.23 and 29.83 months could be desirable to achieve the best quality and quantity grade of Hanwoo beef. However, the positive correlation of carcass cold weight and backfat thickness, and the negative correlation of the yield index according to primal cuts yield indicated that it is necessary to couple the slaughtering management of cattle with improved genetic and breeding method of Hanwoo to increase the production yield of the major prime cuts of Hanwoo beef. © Copyright 2022 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology.Entities:
Keywords: Carcass traits; Correlation; Hanwoo; Market weight; Slaughter age; Yield grade
Year: 2022 PMID: 35174349 PMCID: PMC8819321 DOI: 10.5187/jast.2021.e136
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Technol ISSN: 2055-0391
Least square means (±SD) of carcass traits according to Hanwoo market weight
| Carcass traits | Market weight (kg) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 650 ≥ (n=23) | 651–700 (n=69) | 701–750 (n=88) | 751–800 (n=113) | 801–850 (n=63) | 851 ≤ (n=47) | |
| Slaughter age (month) | 28.83±3.01[ | 28.23±2.71[ | 29.83±2.66[ | 29.62±2.33[ | 30.24±2.41[ | 30.79±2.28[ |
| Carcass cold weight (kg) | 367.43±15.78[ | 397.72±14.49[ | 425.64±15.90[ | 458.56±17.25[ | 490.95±15.50[ | 529.36±25.86[ |
| Ribeye area (cm2) | 78.78±5.68[ | 84.43±7.57[ | 87.14±7.58[ | 91.93±8.21[ | 93.4±7.11[ | 95.77±8.03[ |
| Backfat thickness (mm) | 9.83±4.90[ | 11.83±3.78[ | 12.82±4.65[ | 14.19±4.80[ | 16.70±5.99[ | 17.19±5.83[ |
| Yield index[ | 62.53±1.69[ | 61.85±1.31[ | 61.42±1.49[ | 61.01±1.46[ | 60.16±1.63[ | 59.95±1.50[ |
| Dressing percentage (%) | 58.84±2.06 | 58.65±1.77 | 58.66±1.73 | 59.22±1.82 | 59.35±1.55 | 59.40±1.63 |
| Marbling score[ | 3.35±1.11[ | 3.80±1.30[ | 3.77±1.24[ | 4.01±1.24[ | 4.08±1.08[ | 3.96±1.18[ |
| Primal cuts yield (kg) | 247.65±11.15[ | 260.81±11.73[ | 277.23±12.72[ | 295.41±13.41[ | 311.44±15.08[ | 335.32±19.10[ |
| Fat yield (kg) | 73.05±10.54[ | 88.69±9.78[ | 96.78±14.64[ | 108.33±16.21[ | 123.19±14.84[ | 132.49±18.27[ |
| Bone yield (kg) | 37.58±2.42[ | 38.93±3.28[ | 41.62±3.35[ | 44.28±4.30[ | 45.45±3.24[ | 49.93±5.36[ |
Yield index: (11.06398 – [1.25149 × Backfat thickness (mm)] + [0.28293 × Ribeye area (cm2) + [0.54768 × Carcass cold weight (kg)]) ÷ (Carcass cold weight (kg) × 100).
Marbling score: 1-trace, 9-very abundant.
Means within the same row with different superscript are statistically different (p < 0.05).
Least square means (±SD) of ten major primal cuts yields according to Hanwoo market weight
| Item | Market weight (kg) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 650 ≥ (n=23) | 651–700 (n=69) | 701–750 (n=88) | 751–800 (n=113) | 801–850 (n=63) | 851 ≤ (n=47) | |
| Tenderloin (kg) | 5.40±0.35[ | 5.52±0.37[ | 5.89±0.51[ | 6.12±0.47[ | 6.41±0.50[ | 6.84±0.55[ |
| Sirloin (kg) | 29.81±2.29[ | 31.53±2.57[ | 33.31±2.40[ | 35.75±2.48[ | 37.63±2.59[ | 39.99±2.93[ |
| Strip loin (kg) | 7.45±0.58[ | 7.90±0.68[ | 8.35±0.75[ | 8.96±0.82[ | 9.47±0.81[ | 10.06±0.84[ |
| Chuck (kg) | 13.18±1.41[ | 13.84±1.53[ | 14.75±1.91[ | 16.14±1.78[ | 16.79±1.76[ | 18.64±2.27[ |
| Shoulder (kg) | 21.56±1.39[ | 22.28±1.39[ | 23.66±1.70[ | 25.22±1.90[ | 26.41±1.93[ | 28.29±2.50[ |
| Bottom round (kg) | 20.19±1.13[ | 21.02±1.48[ | 22.08±1.78[ | 23.55±1.97[ | 24.63±1.87[ | 26.54±2.32[ |
| Top round (kg) | 30.96±2.09[ | 32.26±2.08[ | 34.54±2.57[ | 36.86±2.95[ | 38.91±2.55[ | 41.53±2.91[ |
| Brisket (kg) | 39.23±3.70[ | 40.79±3.70[ | 43.65±3.45[ | 45.75±3.93[ | 48.00±4.360[ | 52.46±4.80[ |
| Shank (kg) | 18.90±2.05[ | 19.28±2.02[ | 20.21±1.71[ | 20.99±1.92[ | 21.83±2.32[ | 23.29±2.68[ |
| Rib (kg) | 58.82±4.09[ | 64.17±3.86[ | 68.51±4.76[ | 73.69±5.08[ | 78.99±5.61[ | 85.06±7.40[ |
Means within the same row with different superscripts are statistically different (p < 0.05).
Least square means (±SD) of carcass traits according to slaughter age
| Trait | Slaughter age (month) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 ≥ (n=15) | 26–27 (n=87) | 28–29 (n=96) | 30–31 (n=106) | 32–33 (n=71) | 34 ≤ (n=28) | |
| Market weight (kg) | 687.13±54.27[ | 738.11±65.87[ | 751.92±70.22[ | 777.99±74.82[ | 781.51±74.50[ | 779.86±76.06[ |
| CCW (kg) | 405.40±36.95[ | 435.46±41.53[ | 444.55±46.4[ | 460.62±47.78[ | 459.49±49.64[ | 460.14±51.54[ |
| REA (cm2) | 84.67±9.01[ | 90.43±8.62[ | 89.39±9.89[ | 89.40±7.86[ | 89.75±9.62[ | 89.75±7.22[ |
| BFT (mm) | 12.53±4.94[ | 13.14±4.83[ | 13.28±4.97[ | 14.40±5.43[ | 14.66±5.29[ | 16.43±7.26[ |
| Yield index[ | 61.59±1.71[ | 61.47±1.53[ | 61.28±1.51[ | 60.85±1.68[ | 60.80±1.54[ | 60.38±2.13[ |
| DP (%) | 58.96±1.31 | 58.99±1.66 | 59.08±1.72 | 59.20±1.85 | 58.75±1.86 | 58.94±1.90 |
| Marbling score[ | 3.47±0.99 | 3.94±1.40 | 3.77±1.19 | 3.95±1.18 | 4.01±1.18 | 3.79±1.07 |
| PCY (kg) | 262.89±21.32[ | 283.47±26.20[ | 288.84±28.11[ | 294.66±26.55[ | 294.85±28.90[ | 298.14±31.49[ |
| Fat yield (kg) | 94.22±18.72[ | 99.99±17.75[ | 101.99±20.87[ | 111.76±23.45[ | 109.90±21.87[ | 106.83±23.84[ |
| Bone yield (kg) | 38.96±3.35[ | 42.13±5.03[ | 43.39±5.28[ | 43.76±4.76[ | 44.13±4.63[ | 44.30±6.95[ |
Yield index: (11.06398 – [1.25149 × Backfat thickness (mm)] + [0.28293 × Ribeye area (cm2) + [0.54768 × Carcass cold weight (kg)]) ÷ (Carcass cold weight (kg) × 100).
Marbling score: 1-trace, 9-very abundant.
Means within the same row with different superscript are statistically different (p < 0.05).
CCW, carcass cold weight; REA, ribeye area; BFT, backfat thickness; DP, dressing percentage; MS, marbling score; PCY, primal cuts yield
Least square means (±SD) of ten major primal cuts yields according to slaughter age
| Item | Slaughter age (month) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 ≥ (n=15) | 26–27 (n=87) | 28–29 (n=96) | 30–31 (n=106) | 32–33 (n=71) | 34 ≤ (n=28) | |
| Tenderloin (kg) | 5.49±0.39[ | 5.98±0.60[ | 6.01±0.63[ | 6.12±0.61[ | 6.12±0.61[ | 6.34±0.70[ |
| Sirloin (kg) | 31.43±2.88[ | 34.32±3.60[ | 34.62±3.89[ | 35.35±3.48[ | 35.63±4.27[ | 36.58±3.65[ |
| Strip loin (kg) | 7.86±0.62[ | 8.61±0.96[ | 8.76±1.18[ | 8.79±1.00[ | 9.00±1.08[ | 9.08±1.07[ |
| Chuck (kg) | 13.92±1.72[ | 15.22±2.41[ | 15.64±2.22[ | 15.99±2.13[ | 15.84±2.59[ | 16.35±2.92[ |
| Shoulder (kg) | 22.37±1.71[ | 24.09±2.65[ | 24.62±2.71[ | 25.16±2.35[ | 25.03±2.68[ | 25.67±3.35[ |
| Bottom round (kg) | 20.93±1.50[ | 22.67±2.51[ | 23.16±2.58[ | 23.26±2.43[ | 23.5±2.63[ | 24.08±2.91[ |
| Top round (kg) | 31.70±2.98[ | 35.45±3.93[ | 35.81±3.91[ | 36.61±3.78[ | 36.78±4.12[ | 37.71±4.14[ |
| Brisket (kg) | 40.88±4.13[ | 43.95±5.12[ | 45.74±5.24[ | 45.83±5.27[ | 45.70±5.44[ | 45.94±6.15[ |
| Shank (kg) | 18.93±1.81[ | 20.72±2.32[ | 20.63±2.41[ | 20.97±2.32[ | 21.05±2.39[ | 21.46±2.94[ |
| Rib (kg) | 67.09±8.48[ | 70.22±7.86[ | 71.43±8.37[ | 74.29±8.95[ | 73.75±9.41[ | 72.43±9.42[ |
Means within the same row with different superscripts are statistically different (p < 0.05).
Least square means (±SD) of carcass traits according to yield grade
| Trait | Yield grade | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| A (n=74) | B (n=215) | C (n=114) | |
| Market weight (kg) | 708.27±60.91[ | 757.54±66.31[ | 800.11±74.46[ |
| Age of slaughter (month) | 28.58±2.41[ | 29.68±2.56[ | 30.17±2.69[ |
| Carcass cold weight (kg) | 414.18±37.79[ | 445.65±42.48[ | 478.19±46.86[ |
| Ribeye area (cm2) | 89.43±9.69 | 89.35±8.86 | 89.92±8.40 |
| Backfat thickness (mm) | 7.82±2.03[ | 12.50±2.13[ | 20.76±3.94[ |
| Yield index[ | 63.21±0.56[ | 61.44±0.61[ | 58.99±1.07[ |
| Dressing percentage (%) | 58.48±1.76[ | 58.81±1.61[ | 59.77±1.82[ |
| Marbling score[ | 3.53±1.15[ | 3.88±1.39[ | 4.14±0.79[ |
| Primal cuts yield (kg) | 277.74±25.13[ | 290.32±27.27[ | 297.19±29.47[ |
| Fat yield (kg) | 83.07±12.35[ | 101.76±15.19[ | 127.35±17.86[ |
| Bone yield (kg) | 43.09±4.93 | 43.21±5.43 | 43.39±4.77 |
Yield index : (11.06398 – [1.25149 × Backfat thickness (mm)] + [0.28293 × Ribeye area (cm2) + [0.54768 × Carcass cold weight (kg)]) ÷ (Carcass cold weight (kg) × 100).
Marbling score: 1-trace, 9-very abundant.
Means within the same row with different superscript are statistically different (p < 0.05).
Least square means (±SD) of ten major primal cuts yields according to yield grade
| Item | Yield grade | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| A (n=74) | B (n=215) | C (n=114) | |
| Tenderloin (kg) | 5.97±0.58 | 6.10±0.65 | 6.04±0.60 |
| Sirloin (kg) | 33.78±3.72[ | 34.90±3.64[ | 35.78±4.11[ |
| Strip loin (kg) | 8.58±1.05 | 8.78±1.02 | 8.86±1.14 |
| Chuck (kg) | 15.30±2.34 | 15.79±2.31 | 15.67±2.52 |
| Shoulder (kg) | 24.23±2.58 | 24.73±2.71 | 24.97±2.68 |
| Bottom round (kg) | 23.04±2.40 | 23.03±2.58 | 23.34±2.69 |
| Top round (kg) | 35.44±3.62[ | 35.90±4.00[ | 36.89±4.23[ |
| Brisket (kg) | 43.41±5.02[ | 45.64±5.20[ | 45.55±5.73[ |
| Shank (kg) | 20.29±1.87[ | 20.61±2.42[ | 21.51±2.56[ |
| Rib (kg) | 65.36±6.80[ | 72.47±7.88[ | 76.25±9.12[ |
Means within the same row with different superscripts are statistically different (p < 0.05).
Correlation coefficients between carcass traits and Hanwoo primal cuts yield
| Trait | Tenderloin (kg) | Sirloin (kg) | Strip loin (kg) | Chuck (kg) | Shoulder (kg) | Bottom round (kg) | Top round (kg) | Brisket (kg) | Shank (kg) | Rib (kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slaughter age (month) | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.17 |
| Market weight (kg) | 0.67 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.55 | 0.84 |
| Carcass cold weight (kg) | 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.55 | 0.89 |
| Backfat thickness (mm) | 0.02 | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.42 |
| Ribeye area (cm2) | 0.50 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.47 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.46 | 0.36 | 0.45 |
| Dressing percentage (%) | 0.30 | 0.37 | 0.32 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.32 | 0.19 | 0.44 |
| Yield index | −0.04 | −0.19 | −0.11 | −0.08 | −0.12 | −0.06 | −0.13 | −0.15 | −0.16 | −0.47 |
| Marbling score[ | −0.04 | 0.21 | 0.15 | −0.04 | −0.04 | −0.07 | −0.02 | −0.07 | −0.04 | 0.17 |
Marbling Score: 1-trace, 9-very abundant.
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001.
Multiple regression analysis and contribution of carcass traits and primal cuts of Hanwoo
| Dependent variable | Independent variable |
| Contribution (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | CCW (kg) | BFT (mm) | REA (cm2) | CCW (kg) | BFT (mm) | REA (cm2) | ||
| Tenderloin (kg) | 1.18639 | 0.01042 | −0.04346 | 0.00889 | 0.61 | 75.17 | 22.53 | 2.30 |
| Sirloin (kg) | −0.16619 | 0.06123 | −0.13913 | 0.10673 | 0.74 | 82.18 | 7.31 | 10.51 |
| Strip loin (kg) | −1.15726 | 0.01357 | −0.03729 | 0.04861 | 0.71 | 59.87 | 7.80 | 32.34 |
| Chuck (kg) | −2.1031 | 0.03897 | −0.14236 | 0.02521 | 0.57 | 80.15 | 18.44 | 1.41 |
| Shoulder (kg) | 2.49694 | 0.04843 | −0.16563 | 0.03104 | 0.69 | 82.04 | 16.54 | 1.42 |
| Bottom round (kg) | 1.656 | 0.04233 | −0.16392 | 0.05302 | 0.66 | 75.50 | 19.52 | 4.98 |
| Top round (kg) | 1.96606 | 0.07005 | −0.21784 | 0.06382 | 0.69 | 83.22 | 13.87 | 2.91 |
| Brisket (kg) | 4.66717 | 0.09262 | −0.27806 | 0.03161 | 0.59 | 86.18 | 13.39 | 0.42 |
| Shank (kg) | 7.00651 | 0.02923 | −0.06035 | 0.01698 | 0.32 | 91.94 | 6.76 | 1.31 |
| Rib (kg) | 1.26539 | 0.16837 | 0.01077 | -0.0535 | 0.79 | 99.57 | 0.01 | 0.42 |
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001.
CCW, carcass cold weight; BFT, backfat thickness; REA, ribeye area.