Literature DB >> 9463699

The computation of orientation statistics from visual texture.

S C Dakin1, R J Watt.   

Abstract

This paper examines how observers estimate the overall orientation of spatially disorganised textures containing variable orientation. Experiments used asymmetrical distributions of orientations to separate the predictions from different models of average orientation estimation. Stimuli were composed of two spatially intermingled sets of oriented patches, each set having Gaussian distributed element orientation. The threshold separation of the means of the two sets was determined for a variety of tasks. Discrimination of these textures from a reference composed of two sets with the same mean orientation was well predicted by discrimination of orientation variability. A single interval judgement of which set contained more elements required a greater separation of the set orientations and suggested that the sets must be resolved in the orientation domain for independent representation of their properties. That resolution is required to perform this task further suggests that orientational skew is not coded. Threshold offsets for judgement of average orientation were re-expressed as shifts of four candidate features for coding the central tendency of texel orientations. Comparison with similar thresholds for single distributions of orientations indicated that average orientation is assigned to the centroid of a set of orientation measures.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9463699     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00133-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  65 in total

1.  High temporal frequency synchrony is insufficient for perceptual grouping.

Authors:  Michael Morgan; Eric Castet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The perceptual processing capacity of summary statistics between and within feature dimensions.

Authors:  Mouna Attarha; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Foveal input is not required for perception of crowd facial expression.

Authors:  Benjamin A Wolfe; Anna A Kosovicheva; Allison Yamanashi Leib; Katherine Wood; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Reconstructing representations of dynamic visual objects in early visual cortex.

Authors:  Edmund Chong; Ariana M Familiar; Won Mok Shim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Differential neurodynamics and connectivity in the dorsal and ventral visual pathways during perception of emotional crowds and individuals: a MEG study.

Authors:  Hee Yeon Im; Cody A Cushing; Noreen Ward; Kestutis Kveraga
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Shared attentional resources for global and local motion processing.

Authors:  Paul F Bulakowski; David W Bressler; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The role of attention in the maintenance of feature bindings in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; Andrew Hollingworth; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Crowding is directed to the fovea and preserves only feature contrast.

Authors:  Yury Petrov; Ariella V Popple
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Visual estimation under risk.

Authors:  Michael S Landy; Ross Goutcher; Julia Trommershäuser; Pascal Mamassian
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Dissociable effects of attention and crowding on orientation averaging.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; Peter J Bex; John R Cass; Roger J Watt
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.