Literature DB >> 9463359

Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 synergize in patterning the hindbrain, cranial nerves and second pharyngeal arch.

A Gavalas1, M Studer, A Lumsden, F M Rijli, R Krumlauf, P Chambon.   

Abstract

The analysis of Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 null mutants suggested that these genes are involved in distinct aspects of hindbrain segmentation and specification. Here we investigate the possible functional synergy of the two genes. The generation of Hoxa1(3'RARE)/Hoxb1(3'RARE) compound mutants resulted in mild facial motor nerve defects reminiscent of those present in the Hoxb1 null mutants. Strong genetic interactions between Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 were uncovered by introducing the Hoxb1(3'RARE) and Hoxb1 null mutations into the Hoxa1 null genetic background. Hoxa1(null)/Hoxb1(3'RARE) and Hoxa1(null)/Hoxb1(null )double homozygous embryos showed additional patterning defects in the r4-r6 region but maintained a molecularly distinct r4-like territory. Neurofilament staining and retrograde labelling of motor neurons indicated that Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 synergise in patterning the VIIth through XIth cranial nerves. The second arch expression of neural crest cell markers was abolished or dramatically reduced, suggesting a defect in this cell population. Strikingly, the second arch of the double mutant embryos involuted by 10.5 dpc and this resulted in loss of all second arch-derived elements and complete disruption of external and middle ear development. Additional defects, most notably the lack of tympanic ring, were found in first arch-derived elements, suggesting that interactions between first and second arch take place during development. Taken together, our results unveil an extensive functional synergy between Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 that was not anticipated from the phenotypes of the simple null mutants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9463359     DOI: 10.1242/dev.125.6.1123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  70 in total

Review 1.  Origin of the vertebrate inner ear: evolution and induction of the otic placode.

Authors:  A Streit
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Krox20 and kreisler co-operate in the transcriptional control of segmental expression of Hoxb3 in the developing hindbrain.

Authors:  Miguel Manzanares; Jeannette Nardelli; Pascale Gilardi-Hebenstreit; Heather Marshall; François Giudicelli; María Teresa Martínez-Pastor; Robb Krumlauf; Patrick Charnay
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 3.  Developmental genetic evidence for a monophyletic origin of the bilaterian brain.

Authors:  H Reichert; A Simeone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2001-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations.

Authors:  A Force; M Lynch; F B Pickett; A Amores; Y L Yan; J Postlethwait
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Turning heads: development of vertebrate branchiomotor neurons.

Authors:  Anand Chandrasekhar
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.780

Review 6.  Development of vestibular afferent projections into the hindbrain and their central targets.

Authors:  Adel Maklad; Bernd Fritzsch
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 7.  From hindbrain segmentation to breathing after birth: developmental patterning in rhombomeres 3 and 4.

Authors:  Fabrice Chatonnet; Eduardo Domínguez del Toro; Muriel Thoby-Brisson; Jean Champagnat; Gilles Fortin; Filippo M Rijli; Christelle Thaëron-Antôno
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.590

8.  Fgfr1 regulates patterning of the pharyngeal region.

Authors:  Nina Trokovic; Ras Trokovic; Petra Mai; Juha Partanen
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Hoxb1 functions in both motoneurons and in tissues of the periphery to establish and maintain the proper neuronal circuitry.

Authors:  Benjamin R Arenkiel; Petr Tvrdik; Gary O Gaufo; Mario R Capecchi
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Specification of the mammalian cochlea is dependent on Sonic hedgehog.

Authors:  Martin M Riccomagno; Lenka Martinu; Michael Mulheisen; Doris K Wu; Douglas J Epstein
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.