Literature DB >> 9463076

The social and economic origins of genetic determinism: a case history of the American Eugenics Movement, 1900-1940 and its lessons for today.

G E Allen1.   

Abstract

Eugenics, the attempt to improve the genetic quality of the human species by 'better breeding', developed as a worldwide movement between 1900 and 1940. It was particularly prominent in the United States, Britain and Germany, and in those countries was based on the then-new science of Mendelian genetics. Eugenicists developed research programs to determine the degree in which traits such as Huntington's chorea, blindness, deafness, mental retardation (feeblemindedness), intelligence, alcoholism, schizophrenia, manic depression, rebelliousness, nomadism, prostitution and feeble inhibition were genetically determined. Eugenicists were also active in the political arena, lobbying in the United States for immigration restriction and compulsory sterilization laws for those deemed genetically unfit; in Britain they lobbied for incarceration of genetically unfit and in Germany for sterilization and eventually euthanasia. In all these countries one of the major arguments was that of efficiency: that it was inefficient to allow genetic defects to be multiplied and then have to try and deal with the consequences of state care for the offspring. National socialists called genetically defective individuals 'useless eaters' and argued for sterilization or euthanasia on economic grounds. Similar arguments appeared in the United States and Britain as well. At the present time (1997) much research and publicity is being given to claims about a genetic basis for all the same behaviors (alcoholism, manic depression, etc.), again in an economic context--care for people with such diseases is costing too much. There is an important lesson to learn from the past: genetic arguments are put forward to mask the true--social and economic--causes of human behavioral defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9463076     DOI: 10.1007/bf02259511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  5 in total

1.  Unjustified discrimination: is the moratorium on the use of genetic test results by insurers a contradiction in terms?

Authors:  Ruth Wilkinson
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2010-09

Review 2.  Ethical, legal, social, and policy implications of behavioral genetics.

Authors:  Colleen M Berryessa; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 8.929

3.  Hybrid Vigour? Genes, Genomics, and History.

Authors:  Roberta Bivins
Journal:  Genom Soc Policy       Date:  2008-04-01

4.  Ethical issues in conducting research with deaf populations.

Authors:  Michael McKee; Deirdre Schlehofer; Denise Thew
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  On human self-domestication, psychiatry, and eugenics.

Authors:  Martin Brüne
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 2.464

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.