Literature DB >> 9462349

Seinsheimer's classification of subtrochanteric fractures. Poor reproducibility of 4 observers' evaluation of 50 cases.

P M Gehrchen1, J O Nielsen, B Olesen, B K Andresen.   

Abstract

We examined the reliability of the Seinsheimer classification of subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. 50 consecutive anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were assessed independently by 4 observers twice with a 6-week interval. The interobserver variation was large; only 13 of the 50 fractures were classified identically by all 4 observers. The intraobserver variation showed identical classification in 26-37 of 50 radiographs. When assessing only whether the fracture was subtype 3A or not, the 4 observers agreed in 31 of 50 radiographs. We conclude that the Seinsheimer classification has no value in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9462349     DOI: 10.3109/17453679708999019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  3 in total

1.  Is there any purpose in classifying subtrochanteric fractures? The reproducibility of four classification systems.

Authors:  P M Guyver; M J H McCarthy; Neil P M Jain; R J Poulter; C J P McAllen; J Keenan
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2011-03-30

2.  Evaluation of inter- and intra-observer reliability of current classification systems for subtrochanteric femoral fractures.

Authors:  Ahmet İmerci; Nevres Hurriyet Aydogan; Kursad Tosun
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-11-06

3.  The Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH): the use of a checklist to evaluate hip fracture healing improves agreement between radiologists and orthopedic surgeons.

Authors:  Mary M Chiavaras; Simrit Bains; Hema Choudur; Naveen Parasu; Jon Jacobson; Olufemi Ayeni; Brad Petrisor; Rajesh Chakravertty; Sheila Sprague; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 2.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.