Literature DB >> 29110093

Evaluation of inter- and intra-observer reliability of current classification systems for subtrochanteric femoral fractures.

Ahmet İmerci1, Nevres Hurriyet Aydogan2, Kursad Tosun3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the Russell Taylor, Seinsheimer and AO classification systems, and to investigate whether or not the experience of the surgeon had any effect on the classification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All the radiographs of 35 patients with subtrochanteric femur fracture were classified by 16 observers using the Russell Taylor, Seinsheimer and 31-AO classifications. Two groups of observers were formed of eight orthopedic surgeons, each with at least five-year experience and eight orthopedic assistants, from six different hospitals, who were invited to participate in the study. All the observers reviewed all the X-rays at this first evaluation. At 6 weeks after the first evaluation, the same radiographs were presented to each observer again in a random order and all the observers were requested to classify the fractures again. To evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability, the Fleiss kappa and Cohen's kappa values were used.
RESULTS: In the inter-observer reliability, the mean values of the two evaluations for the Russell Taylor classification were determined to be κ:0.724 (substantial) for the specialists and κ:0.722 (substantial) for the assistants. Using the Seinsheimer classification, the mean values were κ:0.691 (substantial) for the specialists and κ:0.629 (substantial) for the assistants, and for the AO classification, the mean values were κ:0.279 (fair) for the specialists and κ:0.291 (fair) for the assistants. In the intra-observer reliability, the median values for the Russell Taylor classification were determined to be κ:0.955 (almost perfect) for the specialists and κ:0.855 (almost perfect) for the assistants. Using the Seinsheimer classification, the median values were κ:0.915 (almost perfect) for the specialists and κ:0.900 (almost perfect) for the assistants, and for the AO classification, the median values were κ:0.665 (substantial) for the specialists and κ:0.695 (substantial) for the assistants.
CONCLUSIONS: As both the Russell Taylor and Seinsheimer classifications were found to be more reliable and reproducible than the AO classification for subtrochanteric femoral fractures, they can be considered to be more valuable in clinical practice and communication. The experience of the surgeons was not found to have any significance in the evaluation of these three classification systems in these types of fractures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agreement study; Classification; Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability; Subtrochanteric femoral fractures

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29110093     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-017-2065-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  15 in total

1.  Reliability of classification systems for intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur in experienced orthopaedic surgeons.

Authors:  Wen-Jie Jin; Li-Yang Dai; Yi-Min Cui; Qing Zhou; Lei-Sheng Jiang; Hua Lu
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Reliability of the AO/ASIF classification for pertrochanteric femoral fractures.

Authors:  I B Schipper; E W Steyerberg; R M Castelein; A B van Vugt
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2001-02

3.  The proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures.

Authors:  Dalibor Kristek; Ivan Lovrić; Jozo Kristek; Marta Biljan; Gordana Kristek; Kata Sakić
Journal:  Coll Antropol       Date:  2010-09

4.  Trochanteric-entry long cephalomedullary nailing of subtrochanteric fractures caused by low-energy trauma.

Authors:  C Michael Robinson; S Houshian; L A K Khan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Inter and intra-observer agreement evaluation of the AO and the Tronzo classification systems of fractures of the trochanteric area.

Authors:  Julio Urrutia; Tomas Zamora; Pablo Besa; Maximiliano Zamora; Daniel Schweitzer; Ianiv Klaber
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Is there any purpose in classifying subtrochanteric fractures? The reproducibility of four classification systems.

Authors:  P M Guyver; M J H McCarthy; Neil P M Jain; R J Poulter; C J P McAllen; J Keenan
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2011-03-30

7.  The comparison of two classifications for trochanteric femur fractures: the AO/ASIF classification and the Jensen classification.

Authors:  D van Embden; S J Rhemrev; S A G Meylaerts; G R Roukema
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur.

Authors:  F Seinsheimer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Classification of trochanteric fracture of the proximal femur: a study of the reliability of current systems.

Authors:  Humayon Pervez; Martyn J Parker; Glyn A Pryor; Lennel Lutchman; Nishan Chirodian
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  Interobserver variation using the AO/ASIF classification of long bone fractures.

Authors:  D J Johnstone; W J Radford; E J Parnell
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.586

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Classifications in Brief: The Russell-Taylor Classification of Subtrochanteric Hip Fracture.

Authors:  James M Rizkalla; Scott J B Nimmons; Alan L Jones
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Comment on "does auxiliary cerclage wiring provide intrinsic stability in cephalomedullary nailing of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures".

Authors:  Neng-Jun Wang; Bin-Fei Zhang; Yu-Min Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Development and Validation of a Post-Operative Non-Union Risk Score for Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures.

Authors:  Michalis Panteli; James S H Vun; Robert M West; Anthony J Howard; Ippokratis Pountos; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Management of subtrochanteric femur fractures: is open reduction associated with poor outcomes?

Authors:  Michalis Panteli; James Shen Hwa Vun; Robert Michael West; Anthony John Howard; Ippokratis Pountos; Peter Vasilios Giannoudis
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Subtrochanteric femoral fractures and intramedullary nailing complications: a comparison of two implants.

Authors:  Michalis Panteli; James S H Vun; Robert M West; Anthony Howard; Ippokratis Pountos; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2022-06-28

6.  Operative choice for subtrochanteric femoral fracture in school-aged children: Triple elastic stable intramedullary nail versus locking plate.

Authors:  Pan Hong; Xiaolong Zhao; Renhao Ze; Saroj Rai; Ruikang Liu; Jin Li; Xin Tang
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 3.569

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.