BACKGROUND: Abdominal pain is often variable in intensity and difficult to characterise due to its referred pain pattern. Clinical pain is furthermore confounded by various emotional and cognitive factors. AIMS: To develop and apply an experimental model to induce localised gastric pain. SUBJECTS: Twelve healthy male volunteers. METHODS: Stimulating electrodes were mounted on a biopsy forceps and electric stimuli were delivered during gastroscopy. Single, five repeated, and continuous stimuli were given at four locations in the stomach. Pain detection thresholds and pain intensities were assessed together with localisation of the referred pain area. RESULTS: Pain detection thresholds were higher in the prepyloric region compared with those obtained at the lesser and greater curvature. Increasing stimulus intensity resulted in augmented pain perception and repeated stimuli elicited pain at a lower stimulus intensity than single stimuli. Continuous stimuli evoked constant (33%), increasing (33%), or decreasing (33%) pain. The localisation of referred pain varied considerably in the subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The model seems relevant to study basic pain mechanisms elicited by localised stimuli in the stomach. The experimental data support the premise that a gastric focus should always be suspected in patients referred with different kinds of abdominal pain.
BACKGROUND:Abdominal pain is often variable in intensity and difficult to characterise due to its referred pain pattern. Clinical pain is furthermore confounded by various emotional and cognitive factors. AIMS: To develop and apply an experimental model to induce localised gastric pain. SUBJECTS: Twelve healthy male volunteers. METHODS: Stimulating electrodes were mounted on a biopsy forceps and electric stimuli were delivered during gastroscopy. Single, five repeated, and continuous stimuli were given at four locations in the stomach. Pain detection thresholds and pain intensities were assessed together with localisation of the referred pain area. RESULTS:Pain detection thresholds were higher in the prepyloric region compared with those obtained at the lesser and greater curvature. Increasing stimulus intensity resulted in augmented pain perception and repeated stimuli elicited pain at a lower stimulus intensity than single stimuli. Continuous stimuli evoked constant (33%), increasing (33%), or decreasing (33%) pain. The localisation of referred pain varied considerably in the subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The model seems relevant to study basic pain mechanisms elicited by localised stimuli in the stomach. The experimental data support the premise that a gastric focus should always be suspected in patients referred with different kinds of abdominal pain.
Authors: A M Drewes; S Helweg-Larsen; P Petersen; J Brennum; A Andreasen; L H Poulsen; T S Jensen Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 1993-06 Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Daniel-W Kjaer; Marek Stawowy; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Asbjorn-Mohr Drewes; Peter Funch-Jensen Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2006-12-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: A M Drewes; S A K Sami; G Dimcevski; K D Nielsen; P Funch-Jensen; M Valeriani; L Arendt-Nielsen Journal: Gut Date: 2005-10-06 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Peter Funch-Jensen; Hans Gregersen Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2006-05-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Petra Rössel; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; David Niddam; Andrew C N Chen; Asbjørn M Drewes Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2003-04-24 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Christina Brock; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Oliver Wilder-Smith; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-01-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Asbjørn M Drewes; Maciej Gratkowski; Saber A K Sami; Georg Dimcevski; Peter Funch-Jensen; Lars Arendt-Nielsen Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2008-07-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Christopher J Lahr; James Griffith; Charu Subramony; Lindsey Halley; Kristen Adams; Elizabeth R Paine; Robert Schmieg; Saleem Islam; Jay Salameh; Danielle Spree; Truptesh Kothari; Archana Kedar; Yana Nikitina; Thomas Abell Journal: Am Surg Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: Asbjørn M Drewes; Anne E Olesen; Adam D Farmer; Eva Szigethy; Vinciane Rebours; Søren S Olesen Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2020-01-06 Impact factor: 52.329