Literature DB >> 9461402

Trash DNA is what gets thrown away: high rate of DNA loss in Drosophila.

D A Petrov1, D L Hartl.   

Abstract

We have recently described a novel method of estimating neutral rates and patterns of spontaneous mutation (Petrov et al., 1996). This method takes advantage of the propensity of non-LTR retrotransposable elements to create non-functional, 'dead-on-arrival' copies as a product of transposition. Maximum parsimony analysis is used to separate the evolution of actively transposing lineages of a non-LTR element from the fate of individual inactive insertions, and thereby allows one to assess directly the relative rates of different types of mutation, including point substitutions, deletions and insertions. Because non-LTR elements enjoy wide phylogenetic distribution, this method can be used in taxa that do not harbor a significant number of bona fide pseudogenes, as is the case in Drosophila (Jeffs and Ashburner, 1991; Weiner et al., 1986). We used this method with Helena, a non-LTR retrotransposable element present in the Drosophila virilis species group. A striking finding was the virtual absence of insertions and remarkably high incidence of large deletions, which combine to produce a high overall rate of DNA loss. On average, the rate of DNA loss in D. virilis is approximately 75 times faster than that estimated for mammalian pseudogenes (Petrov et al., 1996). The high rate of DNA loss should lead to rapid elimination of non-essential DNA and thus may explain the seemingly paradoxical dearth of pseudogenes in Drosophila. Varying rates of DNA loss may also contribute to differences in genome size (Graur et al., 1989; Petrov et al., 1996), thus explaining the celebrated 'C-value' paradox (John and Miklos, 1988). In this paper we outline the theoretical basis of our method, examine the data from this perspective, and discuss potential problems that may bias our estimates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9461402     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00516-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  18 in total

1.  Sequence evolution and copy number of Ty1-copia retrotransposons in diverse plant genomes.

Authors:  Aura Navarro-Quezada; Daniel J Schoen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Through a genome, darkly: comparative analysis of plant chromosomal DNA.

Authors:  Graham J King
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Genome size evolution in pufferfish: a comparative analysis of diodontid and tetraodontid pufferfish genomes.

Authors:  Daniel E Neafsey; Stephen R Palumbi
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Differential lineage-specific amplification of transposable elements is responsible for genome size variation in Gossypium.

Authors:  Jennifer S Hawkins; HyeRan Kim; John D Nason; Rod A Wing; Jonathan F Wendel
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Retrotransposon sequence variation in four asexual plant species.

Authors:  T Roderick Docking; Fabienne E Saadé; Miranda C Elliott; Daniel J Schoen
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Genome analyses of three strains of Rhodobacter sphaeroides: evidence of rapid evolution of chromosome II.

Authors:  M Choudhary; Xie Zanhua; Y X Fu; S Kaplan
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Vertical inheritance and bursts of transposition have shaped the evolution of the BS non-LTR retrotransposon in Drosophila.

Authors:  Adriana Granzotto; Fabrício R Lopes; Cristina Vieira; Claudia M A Carareto
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.291

8.  Patterns of nucleotide substitution in Drosophila and mammalian genomes.

Authors:  D A Petrov; D L Hartl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Sequence divergence within transposable element families in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Lerat; Carène Rizzon; Christian Biémont
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  DNA transposons: nature and applications in genomics.

Authors:  Martín Muñoz-López; José L García-Pérez
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.