Literature DB >> 9459382

Limited effect of consumption of uncooked (RS2) or retrograded (RS3) resistant starch on putative risk factors for colon cancer in healthy men.

M L Heijnen1, J M van Amelsvoort, P Deurenberg, A C Beynen.   

Abstract

To investigate whether resistant starch (RS) affects putative risk factors for colon cancer, 24 healthy men consumed a daily RS supplement for 4 wk in addition to their habitual diet in a single-blind, randomized, balanced multiple crossover trial. During the first week, all subjects consumed the control supplement containing glucose. Subsequently, each subject consumed, in random order, a supplement with RS2 (uncooked high-amylose cornstarch), RS3 (extruded and retrograded high-amylose cornstarch), and glucose, each for 1 wk. The RS2 and RS3 supplements provided 32 g RS/d. Lithium was added to the supplements to measure compliance. Feces, 24-h urine, and breath samples, as well as a 24-h food-consumption recall were obtained weekly from each subject. Compliance as measured by urinary lithium recovery was satisfactory. The mean composition of the background diet did not differ between the various supplementation periods. Breath-hydrogen excretion, stool weight, and fecal starch excretion were significantly higher during RS than during glucose supplementation, but did not differ during RS2 and RS3 supplementation. There were no significant differences in fecal dry weight, pH, or short-chain fatty acid concentrations, nor in the pH, bile acid concentrations, cytotoxicity, or osmolality of fecal water. It is concluded that in healthy men, supplementing the habitual diet for 1 wk with 32 g RS2 or RS3/d compared with glucose had no effect on putative risk factors for colon cancer, except for increasing stool weight and colonic fermentative activity. There were no significant differences between the effects of RS2 and RS3 on the indexes studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9459382     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/67.2.322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  6 in total

1.  An investigation of cross-sectional associations of a priori-selected dietary components with circulating bile acids.

Authors:  Doratha A Byrd; Rashmi Sinha; Stephanie J Weinstein; Demetrius Albanes; Neal D Freedman; Joshua Sampson; Erikka Loftfield
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 8.472

Review 2.  Prebiotic Potential of Dietary Beans and Pulses and Their Resistant Starch for Aging-Associated Gut and Metabolic Health.

Authors:  Saurabh Kadyan; Aditya Sharma; Bahram H Arjmandi; Prashant Singh; Ravinder Nagpal
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 6.706

3.  Resistant starch type 4-enriched diet lowered blood cholesterols and improved body composition in a double blind controlled cross-over intervention.

Authors:  Sailendra N Nichenametla; Lee A Weidauer; Howard E Wey; Tianna M Beare; Bonny L Specker; Moul Dey
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 5.914

4.  The effects of resistant starches on inflammatory bowel disease in preclinical and clinical settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joshua Montroy; Rania Berjawi; Manoj M Lalu; Eyal Podolsky; Cayden Peixoto; Levent Sahin; Alain Stintzi; David Mack; Dean A Fergusson
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 5.  Effects of Resistant Starch Interventions on Metabolic Biomarkers in Pre-Diabetes and Diabetes Adults.

Authors:  Aswir Abd Rashed; Fatin Saparuddin; Devi-Nair Gunasegavan Rathi; Nur Najihah Mohd Nasir; Ezarul Faradianna Lokman
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-01-12

6.  Serum bile acids and risk factors for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A van Faassen; A Tangerman; B H Bueno-de-Mesquita
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-02-09       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.