Literature DB >> 9459154

The importance of complete excision in the prevention of local recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ.

P A Holland1, A Gandhi, W F Knox, M Wilson, A D Baildam, N J Bundred.   

Abstract

Mastectomy probably represents over-treatment for the majority of women with screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and breast-conserving surgery is now widely advocated. In this study, biopsy cavity shavings were used to ensure complete excision in 129 women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for screen detected DCIS. A margin was considered clear if DCIS was > 1 mm from any margin of excision and shavings were clear. Patients with involved margins (DCIS at resection margin) underwent re-excision, irrespective of shaving status. After re-excision, 101 women (78%) had clear margins and 28 (22%) close margins (DCIS < or = 1 mm from resection margin). Cavity shavings were histologically clear of DCIS in all cases. Ipsilateral DCIS recurrence occurred in 12 (9.3%) patients. Two recurrences also contained invasive carcinoma. The median time to diagnosis was 14 months and all recurrences occurred at the site of the previous biopsy. Seven recurrences were detected at the first annual mammogram, four at the second and one at the third. Ipsilateral recurrence was related to margin status; only 2 out of 101 (2%) patients with clear margins recurred, compared with 10 out of 28 (36%) patients with close margins. Local recurrence and close margin status both correlated with a high modified Van Nuys prognostic index score. Our results indicate that local relapse represents residual DCIS rather than true recurrence in the majority of cases. Cavity shavings have proved ineffective in ensuring complete excision. We now ensure a minimum 10 mm margin of excision around all screen-detected DCIS lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9459154      PMCID: PMC2151263          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  19 in total

1.  Conservative management of intraductal carcinoma (DCIS) of the breast. Collaborating NSABP investigators.

Authors:  E R Fisher; R Leeming; S Anderson; C Redmond; B Fisher
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): a revised concept.

Authors:  F E Gump; D L Jicha; L Ozello
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  In situ ductal carcinoma of the breast: implications of disease pattern and treatment.

Authors:  I S Fentiman; N Fagg; R R Millis; J L Hayward
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.424

4.  Risk factors for breast recurrence in premenopausal and postmenopausal patients with ductal cancers treated by conservation therapy.

Authors:  J M Kurtz; J Jacquemier; R Amalric; H Brandone; Y Ayme; D Hans; C Bressac; J Roth; J M Spitalier
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Quadrantectomy versus lumpectomy for small size breast cancer.

Authors:  U Veronesi; F Volterrani; A Luini; R Saccozzi; M Del Vecchio; R Zucali; V Galimberti; A Rasponi; E Di Re; P Squicciarini
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Psychological morbidity associated with local recurrence of breast cancer.

Authors:  P L Jenkins; V E May; L E Hughes
Journal:  Int J Psychiatry Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.210

7.  Duct carcinoma in situ: 227 cases without microinvasion.

Authors:  M J Silverstein; B F Cohlan; E D Gierson; M Furmanski; P Gamagami; W J Colburn; B S Lewinsky; J R Waisman
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Factors influencing cosmetic outcome and complication risk after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early-stage breast carcinoma.

Authors:  D E Wazer; T DiPetrillo; R Schmidt-Ullrich; L Weld; T J Smith; D J Marchant; N J Robert
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Extent, distribution, and mammographic/histological correlations of breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  R Holland; J H Hendriks; A L Vebeek; M Mravunac; J H Schuurmans Stekhoven
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-03-03       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Duct carcinoma in situ: predictors of local recurrence and progression in patients treated by surgery alone.

Authors:  P Price; H D Sinnett; B Gusterson; G Walsh; R P A'Hern; J A McKinna
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Network meta-analysis of margin threshold for women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Wang; Haitao Chu; Tatyana Shamliyan; Hawre Jalal; Karen M Kuntz; Robert L Kane; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ treated with conservative surgery with or without radiation therapy: patterns of failure and 10-year results.

Authors:  L L Kestin; N S Goldstein; A A Martinez; M Rebner; M Balasubramaniam; R C Frazier; J T Register; J Pettinga; F A Vicini
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Association between patient and tumor characteristics with clinical outcomes in women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Tatyana Shamliyan; Shi-Yi Wang; Beth A Virnig; Todd M Tuttle; Robert L Kane
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

4.  Impact of margin assessment method on positive margin rate and total volume excised.

Authors:  Tracy-Ann Moo; Lydia Choi; Candice Culpepper; Cristina Olcese; Alexandra Heerdt; Lisa Sclafani; Tari A King; Anne S Reiner; Sujata Patil; Edi Brogi; Monica Morrow; Kimberly J Van Zee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Ductal carcinoma in situ in core needle biopsies and its association with extensive in situ component in the surgical specimen.

Authors:  Guerino Barbalaco Neto; Claudia Rossetti; Fernando L Fonseca; Vitor E Valenti; Luiz Carlos de Abreu
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2012-06-20

Review 6.  Current view on ductal carcinoma in situ and importance of the margin thresholds: A review.

Authors:  A Van Cleef; S Altintas; M Huizing; K Papadimitriou; P Van Dam; W Tjalma
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2014

7.  Polygon method: A systematic margin assessment for breast conservation.

Authors:  Shu Ichihara; Suzuko Moritani; Rieko Nishimura; Mikinao Oiwa; Takako Morita; Takako Hayashi; Aya Kato; Tokiko Endo; Akiko Kada; Noriko Ito; Tetsuo Kuroishi; Yasuyuki Sato
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  Imaging-assisted large-format breast pathology: program rationale and development in a nonprofit health system in the United States.

Authors:  F Lee Tucker
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-12-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.