Literature DB >> 9457093

Randomised trial to assess safety and fetal outcome of early and midtrimester amniocentesis. The Canadian Early and Mid-trimester Amniocentesis Trial (CEMAT) Group.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most published reports on early amniocentesis are of cohort studies rather than randomised trials. This study was designed to assess the safety and cytogenetic accuracy of early amniocentesis in-contrast to midtrimester amniocentesis in a randomised multicentre setting.
METHODS: Pregnant women were randomly allocated early amniocentesis (between 11(+0) and 12(+6) gestational weeks(days)) or midtrimester (between 15(+0) and 16(+6) gestational weeks(days)) amniocentesis. A detailed fetal ultrasound examination was done between 15 and 20 gestational weeks in all women. All amniocenteses were done under continuous ultrasound guidance: 11 mL (early amniocentesis) or 20 mL (midtrimester amniocentesis) of amniotic fluid were removed for cytogenic analysis. No more than two needle insertions were done on the same day. All fetal losses (spontaneous or induced abortions) were counted as outcome events and post-procedural losses had cytogenic analysis. Maternal and fetal health were assessed at 20-22 weeks and 5 weeks after delivery. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the significance of the differences between the early amniocentesis and midtrimester amniocentesis groups.
FINDINGS: 4374 pregnant women took part in the study. 1916 (87.8%) of 2183 women in the early amniocentesis group had their amniocentesis before 13 gestational weeks. 1775 (81.2%) of 2185 women in the midtrimester group had their amniocentesis after 15 gestational weeks. There was a significant difference in total fetal losses for early amniocentesis compared with midtrimester amniocentesis (7.6% vs 5.9%; difference 1.7%, one-sided CI 2.98%, p = 0.012). There was a significant increase in talipes equinovarus in the early amniocentesis group compared with the midtrimester amniocentesis group (1.3% vs 0.1%, p = 0.0001). There was a significant difference in postprocedural amniotic-fluid leakage (early amniocentesis 3.5% vs midtrimester amniocentesis 1.7%, p = 0.0007).
INTERPRETATION: Our study shows that early amniocentesis is associated with an increased risk of fetal loss and talipes equinovarus. Our results should be taken into consideration when invasive prenatal diagnosis is being offered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9457093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  16 in total

1.  Accelerated publication versus usual publication in 2 leading medical journals.

Authors:  William A Ghali; Jacques Cornuz; Finlay A McAlister; Jean-Blaise Wasserfallen; P J Devereaux; C David Naylor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Ultrasonographic soft markers of aneuploidy in second trimester: are we lost?

Authors:  Sameer Raniga; P D Desai; Hetal Parikh
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-01-11

3.  Smoking, the xenobiotic pathway, and clubfoot.

Authors:  Amy Sommer; Susan H Blanton; Katelyn Weymouth; Christine Alvarez; B Stephen Richards; Douglas Barnes; Jacqueline T Hecht
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2010-12-01

Review 4.  Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Kate Navaratnam; Faris Mujezinovic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-09-04

5.  Prenatal diagnosis for paediatricians.

Authors:  Anne Summers
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 6.  Noninvasive prenatal testing: the future is now.

Authors:  Errol R Norwitz; Brynn Levy
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013

Review 7.  Instruments for chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Carmen Young; Peter von Dadelszen; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-01-31

Review 8.  Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Z Alfirevic; K Sundberg; S Brigham
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

9.  A four-year retrospective study of amniocentesis: one centre experience.

Authors:  A Daniilidis; H Karydas; V Zournatzi; T Tantanasis; C Giannoulis; J Tzafettas
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.471

10.  Exploring informed choice in the context of prenatal testing: findings from a qualitative study.

Authors:  Beth K Potter; Natasha O'Reilly; Holly Etchegary; Heather Howley; Ian D Graham; Mark Walker; Doug Coyle; Yelena Chorny; Mario Cappelli; Isabelle Boland; Brenda J Wilson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.