Literature DB >> 9457031

Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for anorectal cancer.

A J Iroatulam1, F Agachan, O Alabaz, E G Weiss, J J Nogueras, S D Wexner.   

Abstract

The use of the laparoscopic technique in treating colorectal malignancies for cure is still a controversial issue. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR) in treating malignancies of the lower rectum and anus and to compare the results with patients of matched age and diagnosis treated by conventional open APR by the same surgeon during the same time period. Between August 1991 and December 1996, we performed 235 laparoscopic colorectal procedures, including 8 laparoscopic APRs for malignancies of the lower rectum or anus. There were 6 female and 2 male patients of a mean age of 67 years. Pathologies included 4 adenocarcinomas, 2 melanomas, 1 leiomyosarcoma, and 1 squamous cell carcinoma. Four procedures were laparoscopically completed, and 3 were laparoscopic-assisted. One was converted to an open procedure due to dense adhesions. Five procedures were performed with palliative intent, whereas 3 were performed with curative intent. These patients were evaluated for procedural safety, distal and lateral resection margins, number of lymph nodes harvested, operative time, postoperative ileus, length of hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality. Results were compared with 7 conventional APRs performed between 1991 and 1996, 5 of which were performed for palliation. Histologic studies of the specimen demonstrated free lateral resection margins in all cases in both groups. No differences were noted in the mean free distal resection margins among the four groups: laparoscopic, 2.5 cm; laparoscopic-assisted, 3 cm; converted, 6 cm; and open, 3.6 cm. Mean lymph node harvest was 9, 9, 9, and 10 nodes, respectively. Mean length of surgery was 181, 198, 240, and 131 minutes, respectively. The length of postoperative ileus was 3.2, 7, 3, and 5.9 days, respectively. Mean postoperative length of stay was 6.5, 7, 6, and 12.5 days, respectively. Morbidity was 25 per cent in the laparoscopy group and 43 per cent in the open group. There was no 30-day postoperative mortality recorded in any group. Laparoscopic APR is associated with a 50 per cent reduction in the length of hospitalization without any compromise to lateral or distal resection margins, number of lymph nodes harvested, or morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9457031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  11 in total

1.  Laparoscopic surgery--15 years after clinical introduction.

Authors:  Reinhard Bittner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  New technique for rectal division in laparoscopic anterior resection--with video.

Authors:  Yosuke Fukunaga; Masayuki Higashino; Shinya Tanimura; Masashi Takemura; Yushi Fujiwara; Harushi Osugi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves.

Authors:  George Melich; Young Ki Hong; Jieun Kim; Hyuk Hur; Seung Hyuk Baik; Nam Kyu Kim; A Sender Liberman; Byung Soh Min
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: outcomes in 194 patients and review of the literature.

Authors:  E Bärlehner; T Benhidjeb; S Anders; B Schicke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Is obesity a high-risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery?

Authors:  A J Pikarsky; Y Saida; T Yamaguchi; S Martinez; W Chen; E G Weiss; J J Nogueras; S D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-02-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  A J Pikarsky; R Rosenthal; E G Weiss; S D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Z-G Zhou; M Hu; Y Li; W-Z Lei; Y-Y Yu; Z Cheng; L Li; Y Shu; T-C Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The use of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Nicolae Rişnoveanu; Augustin Cătălin Dima; Mircea Ciurea
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec

9.  Laparoscopic technique and safety experience with barbed suture closure for pelvic cavity after abdominoperineal resection.

Authors:  Nobuhisa Matsuhashi; Takao Takahashi; Kenichi Nonaka; Toshiyuki Tanahashi; Hisashi Imai; Yoshiyuki Sasaki; Yoshihiro Tanaka; Naoki Okumura; Kazuya Yamaguchi; Shinji Osada; Kazuhiro Yoshida
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Laparoscopic surgery for anorectal malignancies other than carcinoma.

Authors:  F Agachan; A Iroatulam; S D Wexner
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1998 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.