Literature DB >> 9456188

Prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography imaging in patients with left ventricular bundle branch block.

N Nallamothu1, B Bagheri, E R Acio, J Heo, A E Iskandrian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) may occur with or without structural heart disease. In patients with coronary artery disease the presence of LBBB is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This study examined the outcome of 293 medically treated patients with LBBB and symptoms who were undergoing stress thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography imaging. One hundred seventy-three men and 120 women with an age range of 67 +/- 9 years and a pretest probability of coronary artery disease of 77% +/- 28% were studied. During a mean follow-up of 33 months 58 hard cardiac events (death or nonfatal myocardial infarction) and 112 total events (hard events, coronary angioplasty, coronary bypass surgery, or cardiac transplantation) occurred. Univariate and multivariate Cox survival analysis with clinical, stress, hemodynamic, and single photon emission computed tomography variables identified the perfusion defect size (chi square = 27, p = 0.0001) and increased lung thallium uptake as the most important independent predictors of hard or total cardiac events. The hard event-free survival rate was 91% in patients with no or small defects (<15% of left ventricular myocardium) and 72% in patients with large defects (p = 0.0001, RR = 3.2, 95% CI 1.7 to 5.9). The total event-free survival rate was 81% in patients with small defects and 48% in patients with large defects (p = 0.0001, RR = 2.7, 95% CI 1.9 to 4.0). The total event rate was 54% in patients with large perfusion defects and increased lung uptake and 17% in patients with no or small abnormality and normal lung thallium uptake (p = 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Single photon emission computed tomography perfusion imaging is useful in predicting outcome in patients with LBBB and intermediate pretest probability of coronary artery disease. The size of perfusion abnormality and lung thallium uptake stratified patients into high and low risk groups with a threefold difference in hard and total cardiac events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9456188     DOI: 10.1016/s1071-3581(97)90006-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  29 in total

1.  The anatomic base of the electrocardiographic abnormality left bundle branch block.

Authors:  M Lev; P N Unger; K M Rosen; S Bharati
Journal:  Adv Cardiol       Date:  1975

2.  Natural history of isolated bundle branch block.

Authors:  G J Fahy; S L Pinski; D P Miller; N McCabe; C Pye; M J Walsh; K Robinson
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Detection of left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis in patients with left bundle branch block: exercise, adenosine or dobutamine imaging?

Authors:  P Vaduganathan; Z X He; C Raghavan; J J Mahmarian; M S Verani
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Complete left bundle branch block in asymptomatic airmen.

Authors:  C M Brake
Journal:  Aerosp Med       Date:  1969-07

5.  ST-segment changes during transmural myocardial ischemia in chronic left bundle branch block.

Authors:  A Cannon; S Ben Freedman; B P Bailey; L Bernstein
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1989-11-15       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  A new approach to the assessment of tomographic thallium-201 scintigraphy in patients with left bundle branch block.

Authors:  L Matzer; H Kiat; J D Friedman; K Van Train; J Maddahi; D S Berman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Left bundle branch block: a predictor of poor left ventricular function in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  R I Hamby; R H Weissman; M N Prakash; I Hoffman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Estimating the likelihood of significant coronary artery disease.

Authors:  D B Pryor; F E Harrell; K L Lee; R M Califf; R A Rosati
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Adenosine thallium-201 is superior to exercise thallium-201 for detecting coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block.

Authors:  J H O'Keefe; T M Bateman; C S Barnhart
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Effect of rate-dependent left bundle branch block on global and regional left ventricular function.

Authors:  D A Bramlet; K G Morris; R E Coleman; D Albert; F R Cobb
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  11 in total

1.  Comparison of left ventricular function at rest and post-stress in patients with myocardial infarction: Evaluation with gated SPECT.

Authors:  C D Bavelaar-Croon; Y G America; D E Atsma; P Dibbets-Schneider; A H Zwinderman; M P Stokkel; E K Pauwels; E E van der Wall
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Myocardial perfusion and function single photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Christopher L Hansen; Richard A Goldstein; Daniel S Berman; Keith B Churchwell; C David Cooke; James R Corbett; S James Cullom; Seth T Dahlberg; James R Galt; Ravi K Garg; Gary V Heller; Mark C Hyun; Lynne L Johnson; April Mann; Benjamin D McCallister; Raymond Taillefer; R Parker Ward; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Clinical imaging for prevention: directed strategies for improved detection of presymptomatic patients with undetected atherosclerosis--Part I: Clinical imaging for prevention.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; Roger S Blumenthal; Matthew J Budoff; Tracy L Faber; Tauqir Goraya; Sandra S Halliburton; Harvey Hecht; Hosen Kiat; Wolfgang Koenig; Shaista Malik; Michael Merhige; Khurram Nasir; James K Min; James O'Keefe; Donna M Polk; Paolo Raggi; Jeffrey A Rosenblatt; Ronald G Schwartz; Allen J Taylor; Gregory S Thomas; William Wijns
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Prognostic value of gated SPECT in patients with left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Yves G C J America; Jeroen J Bax; Eric Boersma; Marcel Stokkel; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Myocardial perfusion defects in left bundle branch block: true or false? Fact or artifact?

Authors:  F J Wackers
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Increased prognostic value of combined myocardial perfusion imaging and exercise electrocardiography in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  B Zerahn; B V Jensen; K D Nielsen; S Møller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Patients with left bundle branch block pattern and high cardiac risk myocardial SPECT: does the current management suffice?

Authors:  T J F Ten Cate; J C Kelder; H W M Plokker; J F Verzijlbergen; N M van Hemel
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  The additive prognostic value of perfusion and functional data assessed by quantitative gated SPECT in women.

Authors:  Yves G C J America; Jeroen J Bax; Eric Boersma; Marcel Stokkel; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Myocardial perfusion SPECT identifies patients with left bundle branch block patterns at high risk for future coronary events.

Authors:  Tim J F ten Cate; Johannes C Kelder; Herbert W M Plokker; J Fred Verzijlbergen; Norbert M van Hemel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Accuracy of non-invasive techniques for diagnosis of coronary artery disease and prediction of cardiac events in patients with left bundle branch block: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elena Biagini; Leslee J Shaw; Don Poldermans; Arend F L Schinkel; Vittoria Rizzello; Abdou Elhendy; Claudio Rapezzi; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.