Literature DB >> 8473638

Adenosine thallium-201 is superior to exercise thallium-201 for detecting coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block.

J H O'Keefe1, T M Bateman, C S Barnhart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the comparative diagnostic accuracy of adenosine versus exercise in conjunction with thallium-201 scintigraphy for the detection and localization of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block on the rest electrocardiogram (ECG).
BACKGROUND: Patients with left bundle branch block on the rest ECG frequently have artifactual reversible septal perfusion defects on exercise thallium-201 scintigraphy. Adenosine thallium scintigraphy is a theoretically attractive alternative in these patients.
METHODS: One hundred seventy-three consecutive patients with left bundle branch block were evaluated with either exercise thallium (n = 56) or adenosine thallium (n = 117) scintigraphy. The tomographic thallium images were interpreted visually with adjunctive quantitative analysis. Follow-up cardiac catheterization was performed in 31 of the 56 patients in the exercise thallium group and 42 of the 117 patients in the adenosine thallium group.
RESULTS: Minor subjective side effects were noted in most patients in the adenosine thallium group (86%); atrioventricular block occurred in seven patients (6%). The overall predictive accuracy was 93% in the adenosine thallium group and 68% in the exercise thallium group (p = 0.01). The combined specificity for the detection of disease in the coronary arteries subtending the septum (the left anterior descending and right coronary arteries) was only 42% with exercise thallium scintigraphy versus 82% with adenosine thallium scintigraphy (p < 0.0002).
CONCLUSIONS: Adenosine thallium imaging 1) was superior to exercise thallium imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block; 2) obviated septal artifacts, thereby markedly improving the specificity in the left anterior descending and right coronary arteries; and 3) was safe in patients with left bundle branch block.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8473638     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90305-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  25 in total

Review 1.  Myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  R J Gibbons
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Left bundle branch block and coronary artery disease: accuracy of dipyridamole thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with exercise anteroseptal perfusion defects.

Authors:  N E Lebtahi; J C Stauffer; A B Delaloye
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Procedure guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  C Anagnostopoulos; M Harbinson; A Kelion; K Kundley; C Y Loong; A Notghi; E Reyes; W Tindale; S R Underwood
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Best patient preparation before and during radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging studies.

Authors:  Lisa A Boger; Lyndy L Volker; Ginger K Hertenstein; Timothy M Bateman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Comparison of the current reasons for undergoing pharmacologic stress during echocardiographic and radionuclide stress testing.

Authors:  Edgar Argulian; Jose Ricardo F Po; Seth Uretsky; Kiran K Kommaraju; Suketukumar Patel; Vikram Agarwal; Randy Cohen; Alan Rozanski
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Prognostic value of gated SPECT in patients with left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Yves G C J America; Jeroen J Bax; Eric Boersma; Marcel Stokkel; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Pharmacologic stress testing: mechanism of action, hemodynamic responses, and results in detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  A S Iskandrian; M S Verani; J Heo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Design and implementation of a nuclear cardiology testing facility in a private-practice cardiology office setting.

Authors:  T M Bateman; J H O'Keefe; M E Williams
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Clinical factors associated with left ventricular ejection fraction disparity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing multimodality imaging.

Authors:  Adnan Khalid; Salman K Bhatti; Mohammad Al-Amoodi; John A House; Taiyeb M Khumri; James H O'Keefe; Michael L Main
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec

10.  President's message: Ensuring appropriate ordering of tests and eliminating inconclusive test results.

Authors:  Myron C Gerson
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.