Literature DB >> 9455668

Spinal manipulation results in immediate H-reflex changes in patients with unilateral disc herniation.

Y Floman1, N Liram, A N Gilai.   

Abstract

The aim of this clinical investigation was to determine whether the abnormal H-reflex complex present in patients with S1 nerve root compression due to lumbosacral disc herniation is improved by single-session lumbar manipulation. Twenty-four patients with unilateral disc herniation at the L5-S1 level underwent spinal H-reflex electro-physiological evaluation. This was carried out before and after single-session lumbar manipulation in the side-lying position. Eligibility criteria for inclusion in the study were: predominant sciatica, no motor or sphincteric involvement, unilateral disc herniation at the L5-S1 level on CT or MR imaging, age between 20 and 50 years. H-reflex responses were recorded bilaterally from the gastrosoleous muscle following stimulation of tibial sensory fibers in the popliteal fossa. H-reflex amplitude in millivolts (HR-A) and H-reflex latency in milliseconds (HR-L) were measured from the spinal reflex response. Pre- and post-manipulation measurements were compared between the affected side and the healthy side. Statistical evaluation was performed by the Wilcoxon matched-pairs test (SPSS). Thirteen patients displayed abnormal H-reflex parameters prior to lumbar manipulation, indicating an S1 nerve root lesion. The mean amplitude was found to be significantly lower on the side of disc herniation than on the normal, healthy side (P = 0.0037). Following manipulation, the abnormal HR-A increased significantly on the affected side while the normal HR-A on the healthy side remained unchanged (P = 0.0045). There was a significant difference between latencies on the affected side and those on the healthy side (P = 0.003). Following manipulation there was a trend toward decreased HR-L. However, this trend did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.3877). Eight patients displayed no H-reflex abnormalities before or after manipulation. Their respective HR-A and HR-L values did not change significantly following manipulation. Three additional patients were excluded due to technical difficulties in achieving manipulation or measuring spinal reflex. These observations may lend physiological support for the clinical effects of manipulative therapy in patients with degenerative disc disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9455668      PMCID: PMC3467729          DOI: 10.1007/bf01834067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  13 in total

1.  The effect of two intensities of massage on H-reflex amplitude.

Authors:  J Goldberg; S J Sullivan; D E Seaborne
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1992-06

2.  H reflex: review and classification with suggested clinical uses.

Authors:  R L Braddom; E W Johnson
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Standardization of H reflex and diagnostic use in Sl radiculopathy.

Authors:  R I Braddom; E W Johnson
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Sacroiliac joint manipulation decreases the H-reflex.

Authors:  B A Murphy; N J Dawson; J R Slack
Journal:  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-03

5.  Spinal manipulative therapy.

Authors:  S V Paris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  H reflex latency i relation to ankle jerk, electromyographic, myelographic, and surgical findings in back pain patients.

Authors:  S P Baylan; J Yu; A E Grant
Journal:  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981 Feb-Mar

7.  Manipulation in treatment of low back pain: a multicentre study.

Authors:  D M Doran; D J Newell
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-04-26

8.  Low back pain and manipulation. Paraparesis after treatment of low back pain by physical methods.

Authors:  J Hooper
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1973-03-17       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Effects of massage on alpha motoneuron excitability.

Authors:  S J Sullivan; L R Williams; D E Seaborne; M Morelli
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1991-08

10.  The Hmax/Mmax ratio as an outcome measure for acute low back pain.

Authors:  G D Cramer; C R Humphreys; M A Hondras; M McGregor; J J Triano
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.437

View more
  5 in total

1.  Changes in H-reflex and V-waves following spinal manipulation.

Authors:  Imran Khan Niazi; Kemal S Türker; Stanley Flavel; Mat Kinget; Jens Duehr; Heidi Haavik
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Models of headache and their implications for treatment using manual therapies.

Authors:  Clifford M Shooker
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2002

3.  Spinal manipulation in the treatment of patients with MRI-confirmed lumbar disc herniation and sacroiliac joint hypomobility: a quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Esmaeil Shokri; Fahimeh Kamali; Ehsan Sinaei; Farahnaz Ghafarinejad
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2018-05-17

4.  Dynamical Analysis of Standing Balance Control on Sloped Surfaces in Individuals with Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Jinping Li; Yang Zhang; Shasha Song; Ying Hou; Yigen Hong; Shouwei Yue; Ke Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Common errors and clinical guidelines for manual muscle testing: "the arm test" and other inaccurate procedures.

Authors:  Walter H Schmitt; Scott C Cuthbert
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2008-12-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.