Literature DB >> 7781578

Sacroiliac joint manipulation decreases the H-reflex.

B A Murphy1, N J Dawson, J R Slack.   

Abstract

Joint manipulation is widely utilized clinically to decrease pain and increase the range of motion of joints displaying limited mobility. Evidence of efficacy is based on subjective reports of symptom improvement as well as on the results of clinical trials. Experiments were designed to determine whether or not sacroiliac joint manipulation affects the amplitude of the Hoffman (H) reflex. Surface EMG recordings of the reflex response to electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve in the popliteal fossa were made from the soleus muscle. The averaged amplitudes of H-reflexes were compared on both legs before and after either sacroiliac joint manipulation or a sham procedure. H-reflex amplitude was significantly decreased (12.9%) in the ipsilateral leg (p < 0.001) following a sacroiliac joint manipulation while there was no significant alteration following the sham intervention. There was no significant alteration in reflex excitability in the contralateral leg to the sacroiliac joint manipulation. To further investigate the mechanism of these reflex alterations, the local anaesthetic cream EMLA (Astra Pharmaceuticals) was applied to the skin overlying the sacroiliac joint and the experiments were repeated on a different group of subjects. This was intended to determine if excitation of cutaneous afferents was responsible for the reflex excitability changes. There was still a significant decrease in reflex excitability (10.6%) following sacroiliac joint manipulation (p < 0.001). These findings indicate that joint manipulation exerts physiological effects on the central nervous system, probably at the segmental level. The fact that the changes persisted in the presence of cutaneous anaesthesia suggests that the reflex changes are likely to be mediated by joint and/or muscle afferents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7781578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0301-150X


  14 in total

1.  Response of lumbar paraspinal muscles spindles is greater to spinal manipulative loading compared with slower loading under length control.

Authors:  Joel G Pickar; Paul S Sung; Yu-Ming Kang; Weiqing Ge
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Functional neuroimaging: a brief overview and feasibility for use in chiropractic research.

Authors:  Reidar P Lystad; Henry Pollard
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2009-03

3.  Spinal manipulation results in immediate H-reflex changes in patients with unilateral disc herniation.

Authors:  Y Floman; N Liram; A N Gilai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Changes in H-reflex and V-waves following spinal manipulation.

Authors:  Imran Khan Niazi; Kemal S Türker; Stanley Flavel; Mat Kinget; Jens Duehr; Heidi Haavik
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  A regional interdependence model of musculoskeletal dysfunction: research, mechanisms, and clinical implications.

Authors:  Derrick G Sueki; Joshua A Cleland; Robert S Wainner
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2013-05

6.  Manual therapy directed at the knee or lumbopelvic region does not influence quadriceps spinal reflex excitability.

Authors:  Terry L Grindstaff; Brian G Pietrosimone; Lindsay D Sauer; D Casey Kerrigan; James T Patrie; Jay Hertel; Christopher D Ingersoll
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2014-04-13

7.  Lumbopelvic joint manipulation and quadriceps activation of people with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Authors:  Terry L Grindstaff; Jay Hertel; James R Beazell; Eric M Magrum; D Casey Kerrigan; Xitao Fan; Christopher D Ingersoll
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Identification of potential neuromotor mechanisms of manual therapy in patients with musculoskeletal disablement: rationale and description of a clinical trial.

Authors:  Beth E Fisher; Todd E Davenport; Kornelia Kulig; Allan D Wu
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 2.474

9.  Common errors and clinical guidelines for manual muscle testing: "the arm test" and other inaccurate procedures.

Authors:  Walter H Schmitt; Scott C Cuthbert
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2008-12-19

10.  Relationship between Biomechanical Characteristics of Spinal Manipulation and Neural Responses in an Animal Model: Effect of Linear Control of Thrust Displacement versus Force, Thrust Amplitude, Thrust Duration, and Thrust Rate.

Authors:  William R Reed; Dong-Yuan Cao; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.