Literature DB >> 9454867

Fornix lesions can facilitate acquisition of the transverse patterning task: a challenge for "configural" theories of hippocampal function.

T J Bussey1, E Clea Warburton, J P Aggleton, J L Muir.   

Abstract

Configural theories of hippocampal function predict that hippocampal dysfunction should impair acquisition of the transverse patterning task, which involves the concurrent solution of three discrimination problems: A+ versus B-; B+ versus C-; and C+ versus A-. The present study tested this prediction in rats using computer-graphic stimuli presented on a touchscreen. Experiment 1 assessed the effects of fornix lesions when the three problems were introduced sequentially (phase 1: A+ vs B-; phase 2: A+ vs B-, B+ vs C-; phase 3: A+ vs B-, B+ vs C-, C+ vs A-). Fornix lesions significantly facilitated acquisition of the complete transverse patterning task (phase 3) but had no effect on the number of sessions or errors required to attain criterion during phase 1 or phase 2. In experiment 2, in which all three problems were presented concurrently from the outset of training, fornix-lesioned animals outperformed control animals during the seventh block of acquisition trials and were not impaired during any stage of acquisition. Importantly, these same animals were significantly impaired on two allocentric spatial tasks: T-maze alternation (experiments 1 and 2) and the Morris Swim Task (experiment 1). These results contradict the predictions of configural theories of hippocampal function and cast doubt on the popular notion that spatial learning is a special case of configural learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9454867      PMCID: PMC6792739     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  30 in total

1.  Acquisition and retention by hippocampal rats of simple, conditional, and configural tasks using tactile and olfactory cues: implications for hippocampal function.

Authors:  I Q Whishaw; J A Tomie
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 2.  Configural association theory and the hippocampal formation: an appraisal and reconfiguration.

Authors:  J W Rudy; R J Sutherland
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.899

3.  Systematic comparison of the effects of hippocampal and fornix-fimbria lesions on acquisition of three configural discriminations.

Authors:  R J McDonald; R A Murphy; F A Guarraci; J R Gortler; N M White; A G Baker
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.899

4.  A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  J M Pearce
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Hippocampal lesions disrupt decrements but not increments in conditioned stimulus processing.

Authors:  J S Han; M Gallagher; P Holland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Dissociable effects of cingulate and medial frontal cortex lesions on stimulus-reward learning using a novel Pavlovian autoshaping procedure for the rat: implications for the neurobiology of emotion.

Authors:  T J Bussey; B J Everitt; T W Robbins
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Hippocampal lesions do not impair negative patterning: a challenge to configural association theory.

Authors:  T L Davidson; M G McKernan; L E Jarrard
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Selective excitotoxic pathology in the rat hippocampus.

Authors:  L E Jarrard; B S Meldrum
Journal:  Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 8.090

9.  Removal of the hippocampus and transection of the fornix produce comparable deficits on delayed non-matching to position by rats.

Authors:  J P Aggleton; A B Keith; J N Rawlins; P R Hunt; A Sahgal
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1992-11-30       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The effects of hippocampal lesions upon spatial and non-spatial tests of working memory.

Authors:  J P Aggleton; P R Hunt; J N Rawlins
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  17 in total

1.  Brain connectivity related to working memory performance.

Authors:  Michelle Hampson; Naomi R Driesen; Pawel Skudlarski; John C Gore; R Todd Constable
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Biphasic hemodynamic responses influence deactivation and may mask activation in block-design fMRI paradigms.

Authors:  Jed A Meltzer; Michiro Negishi; R Todd Constable
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  The NEWMEDS rodent touchscreen test battery for cognition relevant to schizophrenia.

Authors:  M Hvoslef-Eide; A C Mar; S R O Nilsson; J Alsiö; C J Heath; L M Saksida; T W Robbins; T J Bussey
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Transverse patterning and human amnesia.

Authors:  Timothy C Rickard; Mieke Verfaellie; Jordan Grafman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  CA1-specific N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor knockout mice are deficient in solving a nonspatial transverse patterning task.

Authors:  L Rondi-Reig; M Libbey; H Eichenbaum; S Tonegawa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The pharmacological sensitivity of a touchscreen-based visual discrimination task in the rat using simple and perceptually challenging stimuli.

Authors:  J C Talpos; A C Fletcher; C Circelli; M D Tricklebank; S L Dix
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Impaired reality testing in an animal model of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Michael A McDannald; Joshua P Whitt; Gwendolyn G Calhoon; Patrick T Piantadosi; Rose-Marie Karlsson; Patricio O'Donnell; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Transverse patterning dissociates human EEG theta power and hippocampal BOLD activation.

Authors:  Jed A Meltzer; Greg A Fonzo; R Todd Constable
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  A novel touchscreen-automated paired-associate learning (PAL) task sensitive to pharmacological manipulation of the hippocampus: a translational rodent model of cognitive impairments in neurodegenerative disease.

Authors:  J C Talpos; B D Winters; R Dias; L M Saksida; T J Bussey
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  The touchscreen cognitive testing method for rodents: how to get the best out of your rat.

Authors:  Timothy J Bussey; Tina L Padain; Elizabeth A Skillings; Boyer D Winters; A Jennifer Morton; Lisa M Saksida
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 2.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.