Literature DB >> 22116313

The pharmacological sensitivity of a touchscreen-based visual discrimination task in the rat using simple and perceptually challenging stimuli.

J C Talpos1, A C Fletcher, C Circelli, M D Tricklebank, S L Dix.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Cognitive testing with touchscreen-equipped operant boxes ('touchscreens') is becoming increasingly popular. Tasks, such as paired associate learning or reversal learning of visual stimuli, have the discrimination of visual stimuli as a fundamental component. However, the effect of drugs commonly used in the study of cognitive mechanisms has yet to be described in a visual discrimination.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to profile a range of psychoactive agents (glutamatergic, dopaminergic, and cholinergic agonists and antagonists) known to be important in cognitive processing on visual discrimination performance using a touch sensitive computer monitor.
METHODS: Male Lister Hooded rats were trained to a stable level of performance in a simple visual discrimination. In Experiment 1, the effect of MK-801, phencyclidine, memantine, dextroamphetamine sulphate (D-amphetamine) and scopolamine was assessed. In Experiment 2, the stimuli were blended together resulting in a perceptually more demanding discrimination and a reduction in accuracy. The rats used in Experiment 1 were then retested with these 'morphed' stimuli under the influence of the above compounds.
RESULTS: MK-801, PCP, and D-amphetamine induced selective deficits in accuracy in both versions of the task. In contrast, scopolamine and memantine produced non-selective deficits in accuracy. Morphing the stimuli reduced accuracy, but did not alter the observed behavioural profile after compound administration.
CONCLUSION: These data improve our understanding of the basic neuropharmacology of a visual discrimination in cognitive tests employing touchscreens and will aid in the interpretation of pharmacological studies with more cognitively demanding methodologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22116313     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-011-2590-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  56 in total

1.  The organization of visual object representations: a connectionist model of effects of lesions in perirhinal cortex.

Authors:  Timothy J Bussey; Lisa M Saksida
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Effects of subchronic d-amphetamine on prepulse and gap inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex in rats.

Authors:  T H Hijzen; L M Broersen; J L Slangen
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Hippocampal lesions in rats impair learning and memory for locations on a touch-sensitive computer screen: the "ASAT" task.

Authors:  J C Talpos; R Dias; T J Bussey; L M Saksida
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: effects of pipradrol, methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and nomifensine.

Authors:  T W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1978-06-15       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  What is a "low dose" of d-amphetamine for inducing behavioral effects in laboratory rats?

Authors:  D M Grilly; A Loveland
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  The validity of scopolamine as a pharmacological model for cognitive impairment: a review of animal behavioral studies.

Authors:  Inge Klinkenberg; Arjan Blokland
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  The effects of neurotoxic lesions of the perirhinal cortex combined to fornix transection on object recognition memory in the rat.

Authors:  A Ennaceur; J P Aggleton
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Effect of scopolamine on visual attention in rats.

Authors:  D N Jones; G A Higgins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Trial-unique, delayed nonmatching-to-location (TUNL): a novel, highly hippocampus-dependent automated touchscreen test of location memory and pattern separation.

Authors:  J C Talpos; S M McTighe; R Dias; L M Saksida; T J Bussey
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Effects of Subchronic Phencyclidine (PCP) Treatment on Social Behaviors, and Operant Discrimination and Reversal Learning in C57BL/6J Mice.

Authors:  Jonathan L Brigman; Jessica Ihne; Lisa M Saksida; Timothy J Bussey; Andrew Holmes
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 3.558

View more
  24 in total

1.  MK-801 and amphetamine result in dissociable profiles of cognitive impairment in a rodent paired associates learning task with relevance for schizophrenia.

Authors:  John Talpos; Nancy Aerts; Jason Waddell; Thomas Steckler
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Cross-site strain comparison of pharmacological deficits in the touchscreen visual discrimination test.

Authors:  Eric G Mohler; Zhiyong Ding; Lynne E Rueter; Douglas Chapin; Damon Young; Rouba Kozak
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Role for the M1 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor in Top-Down Cognitive Processing Using a Touchscreen Visual Discrimination Task in Mice.

Authors:  R W Gould; D Dencker; M Grannan; M Bubser; X Zhan; J Wess; Z Xiang; C Locuson; C W Lindsley; P J Conn; C K Jones
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.418

4.  NMDA receptor antagonists distort visual grouping in rats performing a modified two-choice visual discrimination task.

Authors:  Katja Clarissa Ward; Halima Zainab Khattak; Louise Richardson; Jonathan Loon Choon Lee; Martin Vreugdenhil
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Rodent age-related impairments in discriminating perceptually similar objects parallel those observed in humans.

Authors:  Sarah A Johnson; Sean M Turner; Lindsay A Santacroce; Katelyn N Carty; Leila Shafiq; Jennifer L Bizon; Andrew P Maurer; Sara N Burke
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.899

6.  Effects of D- and L-govadine on the disruption of touchscreen object-location paired associates learning in rats by acute MK-801 treatment.

Authors:  Brittney R Lins; Anthony G Phillips; John G Howland
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Touchscreen technology in the study of cognition-related behavior.

Authors:  Brian D Kangas; Jack Bergman
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.293

8.  Effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor ligands on sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude and delayed reinforcement in a delay-discounting procedure.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Benjamin T Gunkel; Katherine K Rogers; Mallory N Hughes; Nicholas A Prior
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Dissociable effects of NR2A and NR2B NMDA receptor antagonism on cognitive flexibility but not pattern separation.

Authors:  Gaurav Kumar; Joseph Olley; Thomas Steckler; John Talpos
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Effects of chronic tramadol administration on cognitive flexibility in mice.

Authors:  Elpidio Attoh-Mensah; Marianne Léger; Gilles Loggia; Thomas Fréret; Chantal Chavoix; Pascale Schumann-Bard
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.