PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine if the co-administration of esmolol (ES), a short acting cardioselective beta-blocker, significantly alters the pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics of remifentanil (REMI), an ultra short-acting opioid, in the rat. METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats (N = 8, Wt. = 325 +/- 15 g) were surgically implanted with stainless steel cerebrocortical EEG electrodes three days before the study. Each rat was dosed with REMI (15 micrograms/kg/min), and REMI & ES (15 micrograms/kg/min and 600 micrograms/kg/min) for 21 minutes in a random crossover design. Six serial blood samples were collected over 25 minutes into test-tubes containing 0.5 ml acetonitrile. Blood samples were extracted with methylene chloride and analyzed by a validated GC-MS assay. EEG was captured and subjected to power spectral analysis (0.1-50 Hz) for spectral edge (97%). RESULTS: No significant differences (p < 0.05) were found in clearance (REMI = 287 + 73 ml/min/leg vs. REMI & ES = 289 +/- 148 ml/min kg) or Vd (REMI = 286 +/- 49 ml/kg vs REMI & ES = 248 + 40 ml/kg). A linked sigmoid Emax PK-PD model was used and the pharmacodynamic parameters were not statistically different. Mean Emax and EC50 after REMI were 18.0 +/- 6.0 Hz and 32 +/- 12 ng/ml; and after REMI + ES were 19 + 4.8 Hz and 26 + 8.6 ng/ml. CONCLUSIONS: At the doses tested, there is no pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction between remifentanil and esmolol in the rat.
PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine if the co-administration of esmolol (ES), a short acting cardioselective beta-blocker, significantly alters the pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics of remifentanil (REMI), an ultra short-acting opioid, in the rat. METHODS:Sprague-Dawley rats (N = 8, Wt. = 325 +/- 15 g) were surgically implanted with stainless steel cerebrocortical EEG electrodes three days before the study. Each rat was dosed with REMI (15 micrograms/kg/min), and REMI & ES (15 micrograms/kg/min and 600 micrograms/kg/min) for 21 minutes in a random crossover design. Six serial blood samples were collected over 25 minutes into test-tubes containing 0.5 ml acetonitrile. Blood samples were extracted with methylene chloride and analyzed by a validated GC-MS assay. EEG was captured and subjected to power spectral analysis (0.1-50 Hz) for spectral edge (97%). RESULTS: No significant differences (p < 0.05) were found in clearance (REMI = 287 + 73 ml/min/leg vs. REMI & ES = 289 +/- 148 ml/min kg) or Vd (REMI = 286 +/- 49 ml/kg vs REMI & ES = 248 + 40 ml/kg). A linked sigmoid Emax PK-PD model was used and the pharmacodynamic parameters were not statistically different. Mean Emax and EC50 after REMI were 18.0 +/- 6.0 Hz and 32 +/- 12 ng/ml; and after REMI + ES were 19 + 4.8 Hz and 26 + 8.6 ng/ml. CONCLUSIONS: At the doses tested, there is no pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction between remifentanil and esmolol in the rat.
Authors: H M Amin; A M Sopchak; B F Esposito; L G Henson; R L Batenhorst; A W Fox; E M Camporesi Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 1995-07 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: M Dershwitz; J F Hoke; C E Rosow; P Michałowski; P M Connors; K T Muir; J L Dienstag Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 1996-04 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: P S Glass; D Hardman; Y Kamiyama; T J Quill; G Marton; K H Donn; C M Grosse; D Hermann Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 1993-11 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Joseph F Cotten; Ri Le Ge; Natalie Banacos; Ervin Pejo; S Shaukat Husain; James H Williams; Douglas E Raines Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Leigh V Panlilio; Jonathan L Katz; Roy W Pickens; Charles W Schindler Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2003-03-18 Impact factor: 4.530