Literature DB >> 8638836

Remifentanil versus alfentanil: comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy adult male volunteers.

T D Egan1, C F Minto, D J Hermann, J Barr, K T Muir, S L Shafer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Remifentanil is an esterase-metabolized opioid with a rapid clearance. The aim of this study was to contrast the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil and alfentanil in healthy, adult male volunteers.
METHODS: Ten volunteers received infusions of remifentanil and alfentanil on separate study sessions using a randomized, open-label crossover design. Arterial blood samples were analyzed to determine drug blood concentrations. The electroencephalogram was employed as the measure of drug effect. The pharmacokinetics were characterized using a moment analysis, a nonlinear mixed effects model (NONMEM) population analysis, and context-sensitive half-time computer simulations. After processing the raw electroencephalogram to obtain the spectral edge parameter, the pharmacodynamics were characterized using an effect compartment, inhibitory maximum effect model.
RESULTS: Pharmacokinetically, the two drugs are similar in terms of steady-state distribution volume (VD(SS)), but remifentanil's central clearance (CLc)) is substantially greater. The NONMEM analysis population pharmacokinetic parameters for remifentanil include a CLc of 2.9 l x min(-1), a VDss of 21.81, and a terminal half-life of 35.1 min. Corresponding NONMEM parameters for alfentanil are 0.36 l x min(-1), 34.11, and 94.5 min. Pharmacodynamically, the drugs are similar in terms of the time required for equilibration between blood and the effect-site concentrations, as evidenced by a T(12)k(e0) for remifentanil of 0.75 min [corrected] and 0.96 min for alfentanil. However, remifentanil is 19 times more potent than alfentanil, with an effective concentration for 50% maximal effect of 19.9 ng x ml(-1) versus 375.9 ng x ml(-1) for alfentanil.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to alfentanil, the high clearance of remifentanil, combined with its small steady-state distribution volume, results in a rapid decline in blood concentration after termination of an infusion. With the exception of remifentanil's nearly 20-times greater potency (30-times if alfentanil partitioning between whole blood and plasma is considered), the drugs are pharmacodynamically similar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8638836     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199604000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  62 in total

Review 1.  Context-sensitive half-times: what are they and how valuable are they in anaesthesiology?

Authors:  James M Bailey
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Remifentanil: a review of its use during the induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling-a new classification of biomarkers.

Authors:  Meindert Danhof; Gunnar Alvan; Svein G Dahl; Jochen Kuhlmann; Gilles Paintaud
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  [Effect compartment equilibration and time-to-peak effect. Importance of a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic principle for the daily clinical practice].

Authors:  J Bruhn; P M Schumacher; T W Bouillon
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models of remifentanil in healthy volunteers using artificial neural network analysis.

Authors:  S H Kang; M R Poynton; K M Kim; H Lee; D H Kim; S H Lee; K S Bae; O Linares; S E Kern; G J Noh
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of opioid treatment in acute pain therapy.

Authors:  R N Upton; T J Semple; P E Macintyre
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Vomiting after a pediatric adenotonsillectomy: comparison between propofol induced sevoflurane-nitrous oxide maintained anesthesia and TIVA with propofol-remifentanil.

Authors:  Ji-Hyun Chung; Yoon-Hee Kim; Young-Kwon Ko; Sun-Yeul Lee; Yoon-Tae Nam; Seok-Hwa Yoon
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-09-20

8.  Monitoring the nociception level: a multi-parameter approach.

Authors:  Nir Ben-Israel; Mark Kliger; Galit Zuckerman; Yeshayahu Katz; Ruth Edry
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Haemodynamic effects of remifentanil in children with and without intravenous atropine. An echocardiographic study.

Authors:  C Chanavaz; O Tirel; E Wodey; J Y Bansard; L Senhadji; J C Robert; C Ecoffey
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Influence of biophase distribution and P-glycoprotein interaction on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of the effects of morphine on the EEG.

Authors:  D Groenendaal; J Freijer; D de Mik; M R Bouw; M Danhof; E C M de Lange
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 8.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.