| Literature DB >> 9452852 |
Abstract
Auckland anaesthetists were surveyed. Of these, 68% obtain written informed consent, 67% are familiar with the New Zealand Medical Council's statement on informed consent, and 57% believe that they conform with this statement in their practice. 4% of anaesthetists always warn their patients of the possibility of death, 9% never do. 87% warn of minor complications such as vomiting, 28% warn of possible awareness, 27% of possible paralysis with spinal or epidural. 83% felt that some form of risk-disclosing anaesthetic information leaflet would be of value for elective patients. After perusing a proposed information leaflet, 40% answered "yes" they would be happy for it to be combined with the non-risk-specific anaesthetic information currently given to patients, 23% answered "yes, with reservations", 18% answered "yes, if modified first", 13% "no, only if the patient asks to know more about risks,", and 5% "no, not to any patient".Entities:
Keywords: Auckland; Empirical Approach; Medical Council of New Zealand; Professional Patient Relationship
Mesh:
Year: 1997 PMID: 9452852 DOI: 10.1177/0310057X9702500614
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anaesth Intensive Care ISSN: 0310-057X Impact factor: 1.669