Literature DB >> 16261470

Informed consent for anesthesia: survey of current practices in Japan.

Misa Sakaguchi1, Shoichi Maeda.   

Abstract

Anesthesia requires informed consent because it is an invasive procedure with certain risks. However, the state of informed consent for anesthesia in Japan remains unclear. The purpose of this survey was to examine the state of informed consent for anesthesia in Japan. A questionnaire was sent to all hospitals certified by the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (n = 854). The questionnaire consisted of four sections: explanation of the anesthesia, method of documentation, consent for anesthesia, and other information such as the hospital's size. A total of 504 (59.0%) questionnaires were completed and returned. At 96.7% of hospitals, an anesthesiologist would explain the scheduled anesthesia. Most departments provide an explanation of dental damage, malignant hyperthermia, and nausea/vomiting. Explanation of anesthesia was standardized at 59.0% of hospitals. A written description was handed out to patients routinely at 61.3% of hospitals. Although consent for anesthesia was obtained at more than 90% of departments, only 59.9% of departments would keep records of having obtained consent. This survey found that the explanation of anesthesia varied among hospitals and was not standardized in Japan. Further attention is needed on how to improve the documentation of informed consent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16261470     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-005-0332-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  7 in total

1.  Informed consent. Evaluation of the information provided to patients before anaesthesia and surgery.

Authors:  E Osuna; M D Pérez-Cárceles; J A Pérez-Moreno; A Luna
Journal:  Med Law       Date:  1998

2.  Information and consent for anaesthesia: a postal survey of current practice in Great Britain.

Authors:  E J Watkins; L J Milligan; H A O'Beirne
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 3.  Consent and anaesthetic risk.

Authors:  K Jenkins; A B Baker
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 4.  Injuries and liability related to central vascular catheters: a closed claims analysis.

Authors:  Karen B Domino; T Andrew Bowdle; Karen L Posner; Pete H Spitellie; Lorri A Lee; Frederick W Cheney
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Informed consent.

Authors:  D B Waisel; R D Truog
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Informed consent--survey of Auckland, N.Z. anaesthetists' practice and attitudes.

Authors:  I H Chapman
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.669

Review 7.  Consent for anaesthesia.

Authors:  S M White; T J Baldwin
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.955

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Preoperative anesthesia clinic in Japan: a nationwide survey of the current practice of preoperative anesthesia assessment.

Authors:  Fumimasa Amaya; Saki Shimamoto; Megumi Matsuda; Kyoko Kageyama; Teiji Sawa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Social and Communicative Functions of Informed Consent Forms in East Asia and Beyond.

Authors:  Go Yoshizawa; Teguh H Sasongko; Chih-Hsing Ho; Kazuto Kato
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.599

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.