Literature DB >> 9451372

Women's interest in natural family planning.

J B Stanford1, J C Lemaire, P B Thurman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the United States, approximately 4% of women of reproductive age use natural family planning (NFP) to avoid pregnancy. It is unclear whether this low number is related to a lack of available information, women's lack of interest, or other factors. Our study examined women's interest in using NFP either to become pregnant or to avoid it.
METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to 1500 women, aged 18 to 50, who were randomly selected from driver's license renewal records in Missouri for the year beginning July 1991 and ending June 1992.
RESULTS: Of the 747 returned questionnaires, 484 were from women who were still potentially fertile. Of these women, 22.5% indicated that they would be likely or very likely to use NFP in the future to avoid pregnancy, and 37.4% indicated that they would be likely or very likely to use NFP in the future to become pregnant. Only 2.8% were currently using a method of NFP. Past use of any method of NFP (including the outdated calendar rhythm method) to avoid pregnancy was associated with interest in future use of modern methods of NFP to avoid pregnancy. Past use of NFP to become pregnant and the possible desire for future pregnancy were associated with interest in future use of NFP to conceive.
CONCLUSIONS: Many women who are not currently using NFP indicated that they are interested in doing so in the future, either to avoid pregnancy or to conceive. Interest in future use of NFP is associated with, but not limited to, those who have previously used NFP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Developed Countries; Family Planning; Family Planning, Behavioral Methods; Family Planning, Traditional Methods; Missouri; Natural Family Planning; North America; Northern America; Research Methodology; Research Report; Sampling Studies; Studies; Surveys; United States

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9451372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  7 in total

1.  An inexpensive smartphone-based device for point-of-care ovulation testing.

Authors:  Vaishnavi Potluri; Preethi Sangeetha Kathiresan; Hemanth Kandula; Prudhvi Thirumalaraju; Manoj Kumar Kanakasabapathy; Sandeep Kota Sai Pavan; Divyank Yarravarapu; Anand Soundararajan; Karthik Baskar; Raghav Gupta; Neeraj Gudipati; John C Petrozza; Hadi Shafiee
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 2.  Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Women's Health and Family Planning.

Authors:  Marguerite Duane; Joseph B Stanford; Christina A Porucznik; Pilar Vigil
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-24

3.  The Use of NFP When Pregnancy Is Contraindicated?

Authors:  Justo Aznar; Julio Tudela
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2020-02-11

4.  Hormonal Contraception and the Informed Consent.

Authors:  David J Hilger; Kathleen M Raviele; Teresa A Hilgers
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2018-12-04

5.  Enrollment, Childbearing Motivations, and Intentions of Couples in the Creighton Model Effectiveness, Intentions, and Behaviors Assessment (CEIBA) Study.

Authors:  Joseph B Stanford; Christina A Porucznik
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-09-08

6.  Medical Students' Knowledge of Fertility Awareness-Based Methods of Family Planning.

Authors:  Peter G Danis; Sally A Kurz; Laura M Covert
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-06-01

7.  A Latent Markov Model with Covariates to Study Unobserved Heterogeneity among Fertility Patterns of Couples Employing Natural Family Planning Methods.

Authors:  Fulvia Pennoni; Michele Barbato; Serena Del Zoppo
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-08-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.