Literature DB >> 9448550

Measuring quality of care at the end of life.

M S Donaldson1, M J Field.   

Abstract

Caring for patients at the end of life presents a series of quality-of-care problems to the health care system. In the past, concern has focused on overaggressive treatment of dying patients. Given rapid changes in the financing and delivery of care, it is time to focus on a range of quality problems and address ways to improve care and achieve outcomes desired by patients and their families. We provide a framework for conceptualizing such a task. This article addresses the purposes of measurement, definition of the patient population, timing of measurement, use of surrogates in measurement, scope of services to be evaluated, and the choice of measures. It emphasizes the necessary links between quality measurement and quality improvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9448550     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.158.2.121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  11 in total

1.  Appropriate time frames for data collection in quality of life research among cancer patients at the end of life.

Authors:  Siew Tzuh Tang; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Towards using administrative databases to measure population-based indicators of quality of end-of-life care: testing the methodology.

Authors:  Eva Grunfeld; Lynn Lethbridge; Ron Dewar; Beverley Lawson; Lawrence F Paszat; Grace Johnston; Frederick Burge; Paul McIntyre; Craig C Earle
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.762

3.  Instrument development measuring critical care nurses' attitudes and behaviors with end-of-life care.

Authors:  Meg Zomorodi; Mary R Lynn
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Toward population-based indicators of quality end-of-life care: testing stakeholder agreement.

Authors:  Eva Grunfeld; Robin Urquhart; Eric Mykhalovskiy; Amy Folkes; Grace Johnston; Frederick I Burge; Craig C Earle; Susan Dent
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Impact of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Program Maturity Status on the Nursing Home Resident's Place of Death.

Authors:  Aluem Tark; Mansi Agarwal; Andrew W Dick; Jiyoun Song; Patricia W Stone
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  Families' Perspectives of Quality of Life in Pediatric Palliative Care Patients.

Authors:  Erin Mary Gaab
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2015-03-23

7.  Towards a standardized method of developing quality indicators for palliative care: protocol of the Quality indicators for Palliative Care (Q-PAC) study.

Authors:  Kathleen Leemans; Joachim Cohen; Anneke L Francke; Robert Vander Stichele; Susanne Jj Claessen; Lieve Van den Block; Luc Deliens
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.234

8.  Outcome indicators in palliative care--how to assess quality and success. Focus group and nominal group technique in Germany.

Authors:  Tania Pastrana; Lukas Radbruch; Friedemann Nauck; Gerhard Höver; Martin Fegg; Martina Pestinger; Josef Ross; Norbert Krumm; Christoph Ostgathe
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-08-23       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Association of code status discussion with invasive procedures among advanced-stage cancer and noncancer patients.

Authors:  Akinori Sasaki; Eiji Hiraoka; Yosuke Homma; Osamu Takahashi; Yasuhiro Norisue; Koji Kawai; Shigeki Fujitani
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2017-07-14

10.  Theory-Based Development of an Implementation Intervention Using Community Health Workers to Increase Palliative Care Use.

Authors:  Boateng Kubi; Zachary O Enumah; Kimberley T Lee; Karen M Freund; Thomas J Smith; Lisa A Cooper; Jill T Owczarzak; Fabian M Johnston
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 3.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.