Literature DB >> 9448278

Nativelike topology assembly of small proteins using predicted restraints in Monte Carlo folding simulations.

A R Ortiz1, A Kolinski, J Skolnick.   

Abstract

By incorporating predicted secondary and tertiary restraints derived from multiple sequence alignments into ab initio folding simulations, it has been possible to assemble native-like tertiary structures for a test set of 19 nonhomologous proteins ranging from 29 to 100 residues in length and representing all secondary structural classes. Secondary structural restraints are provided by the PHD secondary structure prediction algorithm that incorporates multiple sequence information. Multiple sequence alignments also provide predicted tertiary restraints via a two-step process: First, seed side chain contacts are selected from a correlated mutation analysis, and then an inverse folding algorithm expands these seed contacts. The predicted secondary and tertiary restraints are incorporated into a lattice-based, reduced protein model for structure assembly and refinement. The resulting native-like topologies exhibit a coordinate root-mean-square deviation from native for the whole chain between 3.1 and 6.7 A, with values ranging from 2.6 to 4.1 A over approximately 80% of the structure. Overall, this study suggests that the use of restraints derived from multiple sequence alignments combined with a fold assembly algorithm is a promising approach to the prediction of the global topology of small proteins.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9448278      PMCID: PMC18658          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.1020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  19 in total

1.  Topology fingerprint approach to the inverse protein folding problem.

Authors:  A Godzik; A Kolinski; J Skolnick
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1992-09-05       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Global folding of proteins using a limited number of distance constraints.

Authors:  M J Smith-Brown; D Kominos; R M Levy
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1993-08

3.  Global fold determination from a small number of distance restraints.

Authors:  A Aszódi; M J Gradwell; W R Taylor
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-08-11       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Improving contact predictions by the combination of correlated mutations and other sources of sequence information.

Authors:  O Olmea; A Valencia
Journal:  Fold Des       Date:  1997

5.  Principles that govern the folding of protein chains.

Authors:  C B Anfinsen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-07-20       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins.

Authors:  U Göbel; C Sander; R Schneider; A Valencia
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1994-04

7.  Progress in protein structure prediction?

Authors:  B Rost; R Schneider; C Sander
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 13.807

8.  Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy.

Authors:  B Rost; C Sander
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-07-20       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices.

Authors:  L Holm; C Sander
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-09-05       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Three-dimensional solution structure of the B domain of staphylococcal protein A: comparisons of the solution and crystal structures.

Authors:  H Gouda; H Torigoe; A Saito; M Sato; Y Arata; I Shimada
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1992-10-13       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  14 in total

1.  Environment-dependent residue contact energies for proteins.

Authors:  C Zhang; S H Kim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Constraint-based assembly of tertiary protein structures from secondary structure elements.

Authors:  K Yue; K A Dill
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison.

Authors:  Angel R Ortiz; Charlie E M Strauss; Osvaldo Olmea
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Reconstruction and stability of secondary structure elements in the context of protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Alexei A Podtelezhnikov; David L Wild
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Contact prediction for beta and alpha-beta proteins using integer linear optimization and its impact on the first principles 3D structure prediction method ASTRO-FOLD.

Authors:  R Rajgaria; Y Wei; C A Floudas
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-06

6.  Towards accurate residue-residue hydrophobic contact prediction for alpha helical proteins via integer linear optimization.

Authors:  R Rajgaria; S R McAllister; C A Floudas
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-03

7.  Predicting continuous local structure and the effect of its substitution for secondary structure in fragment-free protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Eshel Faraggi; Yuedong Yang; Shesheng Zhang; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Trends in template/fragment-free protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Yaoqi Zhou; Yong Duan; Yuedong Yang; Eshel Faraggi; Hongxing Lei
Journal:  Theor Chem Acc       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 1.702

9.  Protein 3D structure computed from evolutionary sequence variation.

Authors:  Debora S Marks; Lucy J Colwell; Robert Sheridan; Thomas A Hopf; Andrea Pagnani; Riccardo Zecchina; Chris Sander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Splitting statistical potentials into meaningful scoring functions: testing the prediction of near-native structures from decoy conformations.

Authors:  Patrick Aloy; Baldo Oliva
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2009-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.