Literature DB >> 9447851

The effects of fentanyl on sevoflurane requirements for loss of consciousness and skin incision.

T Katoh1, K Ikeda.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fentanyl produces a minimal reduction in the minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane to prevent response to a verbal command in 50% of patients (MAC[awake]) at low but analgesic plasma concentrations. The reduction in MAC(awake), however, is still unknown at higher fentanyl concentrations. The reduction in the MAC of sevoflurane by fentanyl has not been described accurately. The purpose of this study was to determine the MAC(awake) and MAC reduction of sevoflurane by fentanyl.
METHODS: Ninety-two patients were randomly allocated to seven fentanyl concentration groups (target plasma concentrations of 0, 1, 1.5, 3, 6, 10, and 14 ng/ml). Responses to verbal command were observed for MAC(awake) assessment at predetermined sevoflurane concentrations. Thereafter, in patients whose target fentanyl concentration was 0 to 10 ng/ml, responses to skin incision were observed for MAC assessment at new steady-state sevoflurane concentrations. The reduction in the MAC(awake) and MAC of sevoflurane by the measured fentanyl concentration was calculated.
RESULTS: There was an initial steep reduction in the MAC of sevoflurane by fentanyl, with 3 ng/ml resulting in a 59% MAC reduction. A ceiling effect was observed, with 10 ng/ml providing only a further 17% reduction in MAC. The initial reduction in MAC(awake) was not as steep as that in MAC. Fentanyl reduced MAC(awake) by approximately 24% at a plasma concentration of 3 ng/ml. Although the reduction curve of MAC(awake) was parabolic, no manifest ceiling effect was observed at concentrations administered in the present study.
CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in sevoflurane requirements for loss of consciousness and skin incision by fentanyl was determined. Fentanyl reduced both requirements, but the mode of the reduction was not comparable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9447851     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199801000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models for inhaled anaesthetics].

Authors:  S Kreuer; J Bruhn; W Wilhelm; T Bouillon
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Gender-specific differences in the central nervous system's response to anesthesia.

Authors:  Lana J Mawhinney; Davita Mabourakh; Michael C Lewis
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 6.829

3.  Comparison of the qCON and qNOX indices for the assessment of unconsciousness level and noxious stimulation response during surgery.

Authors:  Umberto Melia; Eva Gabarron; Mercé Agustí; Nuria Souto; Patricia Pineda; Joan Fontanet; Montserrat Vallverdu; Erik Weber Jensen; Pedro Gambus
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  End-tidal versus manually-controlled low-flow anaesthesia.

Authors:  Umberto Lucangelo; Giuliana Garufi; Emanuele Marras; Massimo Ferluga; Federica Turchet; Francesca Bernabè; Lucia Comuzzi; Giorgio Berlot; Walter A Zin
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Altered temporal variance and neural synchronization of spontaneous brain activity in anesthesia.

Authors:  Zirui Huang; Zhiyao Wang; Jianfeng Zhang; Rui Dai; Jinsong Wu; Yuan Li; Weimin Liang; Ying Mao; Zhong Yang; Giles Holland; Jun Zhang; Georg Northoff
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Breakdown in the temporal and spatial organization of spontaneous brain activity during general anesthesia.

Authors:  Jianfeng Zhang; Zirui Huang; Yali Chen; Jun Zhang; Diana Ghinda; Yuliya Nikolova; Jinsong Wu; Jianghui Xu; Wenjie Bai; Ying Mao; Zhong Yang; Niall Duncan; Pengmin Qin; Hao Wang; Bing Chen; Xuchu Weng; Georg Northoff
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-01-28       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Remifentanil update: clinical science and utility.

Authors:  Richard Beers; Enrico Camporesi
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.749

8.  Response surface model predictions of emergence and response to pain in the recovery room: An evaluation of patients emerging from an isoflurane and fentanyl anesthetic.

Authors:  Noah D Syroid; Ken B Johnson; Nathan L Pace; Dwayne R Westenskow; Diane Tyler; Frederike Brühschwein; Robert W Albert; Shelly Roalstad; Samuel Costy-Bennett; Talmage D Egan
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 9.  Is a new paradigm needed to explain how inhaled anesthetics produce immobility?

Authors:  Edmond I Eger; Douglas E Raines; Steven L Shafer; Hugh C Hemmings; James M Sonner
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Incidence of and risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting at a Japanese Cancer Center: first large-scale study in Japan.

Authors:  Ryozo Morino; Makoto Ozaki; Osamu Nagata; Miyuki Yokota
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 2.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.