Literature DB >> 9447546

An HPLC/MS/MS assay for tacrolimus in patient blood samples. Correlation with results of an ELISA assay.

A M Alak1, S Moy, M Cook, P Lizak, A Niggebiugge, S Menard, A Chilton.   

Abstract

An HPLC/MS/MS assay for tacrolimus in whole blood using FR900520 as an internal standard was validated over the standard curve range of 0.100-10.040 ng ml-1. The calibration curve for tacrolimus in human blood gave a slope of 0.2481, an intercept of 0.007, and a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.9996, with no interference noted from human blood, analyte, or internal standard stock solutions. Use of EDTA or heparin as the preservative in blood resulted in no significant differences. Samples were stable for at least the time required to assay the maximum number of samples that could be placed in the automated system. The limit of sensitivity of the assay was set at the concentration of the lowest nonzero standard tested, i.e., 0.100 ng ml-1. However, validation of the assay to a limit of 0.010 ng ml-1 is currently underway. The within-run and between-run precision and accuracy of the method were determined for four quality control samples. The highest CV was seen at 0.1 ng ml-1 (17.6% within-run and 15.9% between-run), with other CV < 5%. The recovery ranged 79.6-81.3% for tacrolimus over the range 0.3-8.0 ng ml-1 and was 63.10 +/- 1.37% for FR900520. There was a linear correlation (r2 = 0.963) between assay results by HPLC/MS/MS and ELISA in whole blood from atopic dermatitis patients treated with topical tacrolimus ointment. The difference between the means +/- S.D. determined by HPLC/MS/MS (1.22 +/- 1.46 ng ml-1) and ELISA (1.12 +/- 1.29 ng ml-1) was significant by a paired t-test (P < 0.001) Similarly, there was a linear correlation (r2 = 0.841) between assay results by HPLC/MS/MS and IMx in whole blood from solid organ transplant patients treated with tacrolimus. The difference between the means was significantly higher (P < 0.001) for the IMx (15.80 +/- 8.37 ng ml-1) than the HPLC/MS/MS (13.42 +/- 6.87 ng ml-1).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9447546     DOI: 10.1016/s0731-7085(96)01951-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal        ISSN: 0731-7085            Impact factor:   3.935


  5 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetic model and Bayesian estimator for 2 tacrolimus formulations in adult liver transplant patients.

Authors:  Camille Riff; Jean Debord; Caroline Monchaud; Pierre Marquet; Jean-Baptiste Woillard
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Christine E Staatz; Susan E Tett
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Relative bioavailability of single doses of prolonged-release tacrolimus administered as a suspension, orally or via a nasogastric tube, compared with intact capsules: a phase 1 study in healthy participants.

Authors:  Nasrullah Undre; James Dickinson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Validation of a Capillary Dry Blood Sample MITRA-Based Assay for the Quantitative Determination of Systemic Tacrolimus Concentrations in Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Nasrullah Undre; Ian Dawson; Varuna Aluvihare; Nassim Kamar; Faouzi Saliba; Nicholas Torpey; Swapneel Anaokar; Gbenga Kazeem; Imran Hussain
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.681

5.  Quantitation of Tacrolimus in Human Whole Blood Samples Using the MITRA Microsampling Device.

Authors:  Nasrullah Undre; Imran Hussain; John Meijer; Johannes Stanta; Gordon Swan; Ian Dawson
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.681

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.