Literature DB >> 9447328

Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in aortic stenosis. Prognostic value after valve replacement and underlying mechanisms.

O Lund1, C Flø, F T Jensen, K Emmertsen, T T Nielsen, B S Rasmussen, O K Hansen, H K Pilegaard, L H Kristensen.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aims of the study were to examine the prognostic value of pre-operative left ventricular systolic and diastolic function on early, and late mortality after valve replacement for aortic stenosis, and to identify possible underlying mechanisms. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Ninety-one prospectively recruited consecutive patients with a mean age of 61 years underwent valve replacement for aortic stenosis with concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting in 32 and a minimum postoperative observation period of 5.4 years. There were six early (< or = 30 days postoperatively) and 19 late deaths, and 18 deaths from specific causes (cardiac and prosthetic valve related). Early mortality occurred exclusively among patients with a combined subnormal left ventricular systolic function (subnormal ejection fraction or peak ejection rate, or supranormal time-to-peak ejection--duration of systole ratio) and a subnormal fast filling fraction. In Cox regression models on crude mortality and specific deaths, a subnormal ejection fraction and a fast filling fraction of < or = 45% were the only independent risk factors. Patients with none of these risk factors had normal sex- and age-specific survival, those with any one factor had an early, and those with both factors a massive early and a late excess mortality, with 5-year crude survival of 92%, 77%, and 50%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Systolic wall stress was without prognostic value. Further analyses indicated that impairment of left ventricular function occurred with increasing muscle mass over two phases: (1) diastolic dysfunction characterized by a pattern of severe relative concentric hypertrophy; (2) the addition of systolic dysfunction characterized by a more dilated, less concentric chamber geometry. Coronary artery disease seemed to provoke the latter development sooner.
CONCLUSIONS: Impaired systolic and diastolic left ventricular function, irrespective of afterload, were decisive independent pre-operative risk factors for early as well as late mortality after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. The adverse influence of concentric hypertrophy was the main underlying mechanism. Operative intervention, before impairment of diastolic and systolic function, should be advocated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9447328     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  32 in total

Review 1.  Interface between valve disease and ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  B Iung
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Relationship of PON1 192 and 55 gene polymorphisms to calcific valvular aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Luis M Moura; Susana Faria; Miguel Brito; Fausto J Pinto; Steen D Kristensen; Isabel M Barros; Nalini Rajamannan; Francisco Rocha-Gonçalves
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2012-05-15

3.  What influences the outcome of valve replacement in critical aortic stenosis?

Authors:  H Baumgartner
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Effects of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition on systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics and ventricular function in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Brian R Lindman; Alan Zajarias; José A Madrazo; Jay Shah; Brian F Gage; Eric Novak; Stephanie N Johnson; Murali M Chakinala; Tara A Hohn; Mohammed Saghir; Douglas L Mann
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Improving risk assessment for post-surgical low cardiac output syndrome in patients without severely reduced ejection fraction undergoing open aortic valve replacement. The role of global longitudinal strain and right ventricular free wall strain.

Authors:  K Balderas-Muñoz; H Rodríguez-Zanella; J F Fritche-Salazar; N Ávila-Vanzzini; L E Juárez Orozco; J A Arias-Godínez; O Calvillo-Argüelles; S Rivera-Peralta; J C Sauza-Sosa; M E Ruiz-Esparza; E Bucio-Reta; A Rómero; N Espinola-Zavaleta; B Domínguez-Mendez; M Gaxiola-Macias; M A Martínez-Ríos
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  One problem two issues! Left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Maqsood M Elahi; Anthony Chuang; Michael J Ewing; Charles H Choi; Peter W Grant; Bashir M Matata
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2014-01

7.  Left atrial remodelling in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a speckle-tracking prospective, longitudinal study.

Authors:  Flavio D'Ascenzi; Matteo Cameli; Michael Henein; Alessandro Iadanza; Rosanna Reccia; Matteo Lisi; Valeria Curci; Giuseppe Sinicropi; Andrea Torrisi; Carlo Pierli; Sergio Mondillo
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Valve replacement in patients with critical aortic stenosis and depressed left ventricular function: predictors of operative risk, left ventricular function recovery, and long term outcome.

Authors:  B Vaquette; H Corbineau; M Laurent; B Lelong; T Langanay; C de Place; C Froger-Bompas; C Leclercq; C Daubert; A Leguerrier
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Left atrioventricular plane displacement but not left ventricular ejection fraction is influenced by the degree of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  E Rydberg; P Gudmundsson; L Kennedy; L Erhardt; R Willenheimer
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Risk stratification and management of aortic stenosis with concomitant left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Matthew L Steinhauser; Peter H Stone
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.