BACKGROUND: Acute spontaneous spinal cord syndromes often remain etiologically ambiguous despite extensive diagnostic efforts. In the previous literature five cases are described with acute spinal cord syndromes interpreted as spinal cord ischemic strokes because of association with vertebral body infarctions on MRI. CASE DESCRIPTIONS: Three cases are presented, and the literature is reviewed. In addition to an extensive diagnostic battery including an initial MRI without pathological signs, follow-up MRI at different time intervals from the onset of symptoms showed T2 hyperintense signals in vertebral bodies. Patient 1, who had plaques in the abdominal aorta, had suffered a thoracolumbar spinal infarction; this and a concomitant infarction of the left portion of T-12 could be demonstrated on follow-up MRI on day 12. Patient 2, who had incomplete transverse spinal artery syndrome below T-3, had an abnormal signal at the T-2 level of the spinal cord on follow-up MRI on day 5; this was one segment above infarction of the dorsal area of T-3, corresponding to the ascending course of the medullary artery. The spinal cord of patient 3, who had a posterior spinal artery syndrome below T-11, was unremarkable on follow-up MRI on day 14, but a T2 hyperintense signal was noted in the dorsal area of T-10. CONCLUSIONS: Vertebral body infarction represents the only confirmatory sign for the otherwise exclusionary diagnostic procedure for spinal cord ischemic stroke and must be searched for on follow-up MRI as a key to correct diagnosis.
BACKGROUND: Acute spontaneous spinal cord syndromes often remain etiologically ambiguous despite extensive diagnostic efforts. In the previous literature five cases are described with acute spinal cord syndromes interpreted as spinal cord ischemic strokes because of association with vertebral body infarctions on MRI. CASE DESCRIPTIONS: Three cases are presented, and the literature is reviewed. In addition to an extensive diagnostic battery including an initial MRI without pathological signs, follow-up MRI at different time intervals from the onset of symptoms showed T2 hyperintense signals in vertebral bodies. Patient 1, who had plaques in the abdominal aorta, had suffered a thoracolumbar spinal infarction; this and a concomitant infarction of the left portion of T-12 could be demonstrated on follow-up MRI on day 12. Patient 2, who had incomplete transverse spinal artery syndrome below T-3, had an abnormal signal at the T-2 level of the spinal cord on follow-up MRI on day 5; this was one segment above infarction of the dorsal area of T-3, corresponding to the ascending course of the medullary artery. The spinal cord of patient 3, who had a posterior spinal artery syndrome below T-11, was unremarkable on follow-up MRI on day 14, but a T2 hyperintense signal was noted in the dorsal area of T-10. CONCLUSIONS:Vertebral body infarction represents the only confirmatory sign for the otherwise exclusionary diagnostic procedure for spinal cord ischemic stroke and must be searched for on follow-up MRI as a key to correct diagnosis.
Authors: M I Vargas; J Gariani; R Sztajzel; I Barnaure-Nachbar; B M Delattre; K O Lovblad; J-L Dietemann Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: T J Loher; C L Bassetti; K O Lövblad; F P Stepper; M Sturzenegger; C Kiefer; K Nedeltchev; M Arnold; L Remonda; G Schroth Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2003-06-27 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Wolfgang Krampla; Fahmy Aboul-Enein; Julia Jecel; Wilfried Lang; Elisabeth Fertl; Walter Hruby; Wolfgang Kristoferitsch Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Waqar Waheed; Anjali L Varigonda; Chris E Holmes; Christopher Trevino; Neil M Borden; W Pendlebury Journal: Case Rep Neurol Med Date: 2016-03-14