| Literature DB >> 23956562 |
Ajith Sivadasan1, Mathew Alexander, Anil K Patil, Sunithi Mani.
Abstract
Spinal cord infarction (SCI) often remains undiagnosed due to infrequent occurrence and lack of established diagnostic procedures. The unique pattern of blood supply explains the heterogeneity of clinical presentation. We present three cases of SCI to highlight the varied spectrum of clinicoradiological findings. The first patient had posterior spinal artery infarction, and spine imaging showed infarction of adjacent vertebral body, which is usually rare. The second patient had anterior spinal artery infarction and the cANCA titers were elevated. The third patient had a pure motor quadriparesis. Initial imaging did not show any cord infarction, but signal changes were noted on serial imaging. Fibrocartilagenous embolism (FCE) seems the most likely etiology in the first and third cases. A high index of clinical suspicion is necessary for prompt diagnosis. Sensitivity of the initial magnetic resonance imaging remains limited, necessitating serial follow-up scans. Infarction of the adjacent vertebral body is a useful confirmatory sign. Fat suppression images can delineate the marrow signal changes better. Elderly patients with vascular risk factors and degenerative discs need to avoid mechanical triggers that predispose to FCE. Younger patients with SCI will need evaluation for cardioembolic source and vasculitis.Entities:
Keywords: Anterior spinal artery; fibrocartilagenous embolism; magnetic resonance imaging; posterior spinal artery; spinal cord infarction
Year: 2013 PMID: 23956562 PMCID: PMC3724072 DOI: 10.4103/0972-2327.112464
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Indian Acad Neurol ISSN: 0972-2327 Impact factor: 1.383
Figure 1Case 1 - T2-weighted STIR sagittal (a) and T2-weightedW axial (b) images showing cord hyperintensity (thick arrow) posteriorly from T7 to T11, with marrow edema in the posterior aspect of the D10 vertebral body (thin arrow). (c) Repeat scan 8 months later showing subtle hyperintensity with volume loss
Figure 2Case 2 – T2-weighted sagittal (a), T2-weighted axial (b) and postcontrast T1-weighted sagittal (c) images showing hyperintensity along the anterior aspect (thick arrow) from C3 to C6/7 level with expansion of cord and patchy enhancement
Figure 3Case 3 – T2-weighted sagittal (a) image showing ossified posterolateral ligament with cord signal changes (thick arrow) mainly at the C3-C4 level. Repeat imaging after 3 weeks with T2-weighted sagittal (b) and STIR (c) images showing prominent hyperintensity of cord mainly at the C3 level consistent with edema secondary to infarct