Literature DB >> 9443861

A test statistic to detect errors in sib-pair relationships.

M Ehm1, M Wagner.   

Abstract

Several authors have proposed algorithms to detect Mendelian errors in human genetic linkage data. Most currently available methods use likelihood-based methods on multiplex family data to identify typing or pedigree errors. These algorithms cannot be applied in many sib-pair collections, because of lack of parental-genotype information. Nonetheless, misspecifying the relationships between individuals has serious consequences for sib-pair linkage studies: false relationships bias the statistics designed to identify linkage with disease phenotypes. To test the hypothesis that two individuals are sibs, we propose a test statistic based on the summation, over a large number of genetic markers, of the number of alleles shared identical by state by a pair of individuals, for each marker. The test statistic has an approximately normal distribution under the null hypothesis, and extreme negative values correspond to nonsib pairs. Power and significance studies show that the test statistic calculated by use of 50 unlinked markers has 96% power to detect half-sibs and has 100% power to detect unrelated individuals as not full-sib pairs, with a 5% false-positive rate. Furthermore, extreme positive values of the test statistic identify sibs as MZ twins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9443861      PMCID: PMC1376795          DOI: 10.1086/301668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  8 in total

1.  Influence of aberrant observations on high-resolution linkage analysis outcomes.

Authors:  K H Buetow
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Identifying marker typing incompatibilities in linkage analysis.

Authors:  H M Stringham; M Boehnke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Accurate inference of relationships in sib-pair linkage studies.

Authors:  M Boehnke; N J Cox
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  A test statistic for the affected-sib-set method.

Authors:  K Lange
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 1.670

5.  Error detection for genetic data, using likelihood methods.

Authors:  M G Ehm; M Kimmel; R W Cottingham
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Evaluating pedigree data. I. The estimation of pedigree error in the presence of marker mistyping.

Authors:  G M Lathrop; A B Hooper; J W Huntsman; R H Ward
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  The information contained in multiple sibling pairs.

Authors:  S E Hodge
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Computer-simulation methods in human linkage analysis.

Authors:  J Ott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 11.205

  8 in total
  16 in total

1.  Statistical tests for detection of misspecified relationships by use of genome-screen data.

Authors:  M S McPeek; L Sun
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Improved inference of relationship for pairs of individuals.

Authors:  M P Epstein; W L Duren; M Boehnke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-10-13       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Detection and integration of genotyping errors in statistical genetics.

Authors:  Eric Sobel; Jeanette C Papp; Kenneth Lange
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Nonpaternity in linkage studies of extremely discordant sib pairs.

Authors:  Michael C Neale; Benjamin M Neale; Patrick F Sullivan
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-12-14       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Methods to classify familial relationships in the presence of laboratory errors, without parental data.

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Rebecca A Betensky
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  PedCheck: a program for identification of genotype incompatibilities in linkage analysis.

Authors:  J R O'Connell; D E Weeks
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Whole-genome screening in ankylosing spondylitis: evidence of non-MHC genetic-susceptibility loci.

Authors:  S H Laval; A Timms; S Edwards; L Bradbury; S Brophy; A Milicic; L Rubin; K A Siminovitch; D E Weeks; A Calin; B P Wordsworth; M A Brown
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-02-27       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  A genomewide scan for type 1-diabetes susceptibility in Scandinavian families: identification of new loci with evidence of interactions.

Authors:  J Nerup; F Pociot
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-10-11       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Genomewide search for type 2 diabetes susceptibility genes in four American populations.

Authors:  M G Ehm; M C Karnoub; H Sakul; K Gottschalk; D C Holt; J L Weber; D Vaske; D Briley; L Briley; J Kopf; P McMillen; Q Nguyen; M Reisman; E H Lai; G Joslyn; N S Shepherd; C Bell; M J Wagner; D K Burns
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-05-02       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Genotyping error detection through tightly linked markers.

Authors:  Guohua Zou; Deyun Pan; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.