Literature DB >> 9440780

Oromandibular reconstruction using microvascular composite flaps: report of 210 cases.

M L Urken1, D Buchbinder, P D Costantino, U Sinha, D Okay, W Lawson, H F Biller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the experience of 1 microvascular surgeon during an 11-year period in performing 210 vascularized bone-containing free flaps for oromandibular reconstruction.
DESIGN: Retrospective medical records review of patients who underwent primary and secondary oromandibular reconstruction with the use of vascularized bone free flaps.
SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 201 patients underwent 210 composite free-flap reconstructions of the mandible for various disorders and with a range of bony and soft tissue defects. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent the microvascular transfer of vascularized bone flaps from the ilium, fibula, or scapula. In selected cases, 2 simultaneous free flaps were transferred to achieve an optimal bone and soft tissue reconstruction. Endosteal dental implants were used in 81 patients, with a total of 360 fixtures placed during these 11 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The success of microvascular free tissue transfer, dental implant extrusion, and short- and long-term complications at the recipient and donor sites.
RESULTS: Of the 210 mandibular reconstructions that were performed, 202 were successful in reestablishing mandibular continuity. Reexploration for vascular-related complications was done in 16 patients, 8 of whom were successfully treated, yielding an overall success rate of 96%. The overall success rate for endosteal dental implants was 92%. The implant success rate was 86% when the bone in which the fixtures were placed was irradiated postoperatively. The success rate was 64% in the 14 fixtures that were placed into previously irradiated bone.
CONCLUSIONS: The success of the use of vascularized bone free flaps in restoring continuity to the mandible is clearly demonstrated in this series. There was an acceptable incidence of donor- and recipient-site complications that resulted in minimal long-term morbidity. The careful selection of a donor site(s) for oromandibular reconstruction allows for an optimal restoration of bony and soft tissue defects. Dental implants can be safely used in oromandibular reconstruction with a high level of success. Placing these implants during the initial surgery shortens the duration for achieving dental rehabilitation and enhances the success of the implants when postoperative radiotherapy is administered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9440780     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.124.1.46

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  40 in total

1.  Composite mandibulectomy: a novel animal model.

Authors:  Douglas R Sidell; Tara Aghaloo; Sotirios Tetradis; Min Lee; Olga Bezouglaia; Adam DeConde; Maie A St John
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  [Anterolateral thigh perforator flaps for facial reconstruction after tumour surgery].

Authors:  Alexander Gaggl; Heinz Bürger; Gerald Lesnik; Ernst Müller; Friedrich Chiari
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2006-09

Review 3.  Biomaterial scaffolds for treating osteoporotic bone.

Authors:  Julie A Sterling; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 4.  Free-Flap Reconstruction of the Mandible.

Authors:  Roderick Y Kim; Mofiyinfolu Sokoya; Yadranko Ducic; Fayette Williams
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 5.  Mandibular Reconstruction: Overview.

Authors:  Batchu Pavan Kumar; V Venkatesh; K A Jeevan Kumar; B Yashwanth Yadav; S Ram Mohan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-04-19

Review 6.  Pre- and post-operative management of dental implant placement. Part 2: management of early-presenting complications.

Authors:  G Bryce; D I Bomfim; G S Bassi
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.626

7.  Efficacy of PRP in the Reconstruction of Mandibular Segmental Defects Using Iliac Bone Grafts.

Authors:  D P Uma Magesh; C Kumaravelu; G Uma Maheshwari
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-09-27

8.  Step-by-step surgical technique for mandibular reconstruction with fibular free flap: application of digital technology in virtual surgical planning.

Authors:  G Succo; M Berrone; B Battiston; P Tos; F Goia; P Appendino; E Crosetti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Translational treatment paradigm for managing non-unions secondary to radiation injury utilizing adipose derived stem cells and angiogenic therapy.

Authors:  Alexis Donneys; Jordan T Blough; Noah S Nelson; Joseph E Perosky; Sagar S Deshpande; Stephen Y Kang; Peter A Felice; Christian Figueredo; Jonathan R Peterson; Kenneth M Kozloff; Benjamin Levi; Douglas B Chepeha; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.147

10.  Defining the critical-sized defect in a rat segmental mandibulectomy model.

Authors:  Adam S DeConde; Matthew K Lee; Douglas Sidell; Tara Aghaloo; Min Lee; Sotirios Tetradis; Kyle Low; David Elashoff; Tristan Grogan; Ali R Sepahdari; Maie St John
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.