Literature DB >> 24232293

Defining the critical-sized defect in a rat segmental mandibulectomy model.

Adam S DeConde1, Matthew K Lee1, Douglas Sidell1, Tara Aghaloo2, Min Lee3, Sotirios Tetradis4, Kyle Low5, David Elashoff6, Tristan Grogan7, Ali R Sepahdari8, Maie St John9.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Advances in tissue engineering offer potential alternatives to current mandibular reconstructive techniques; however, before clinical translation of this technology, a relevant animal model must be used to validate possible interventions.
OBJECTIVE: To establish the critical-sized segmental mandibular defect that does not heal spontaneously in the rat mandible. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Prospective study of mandibular defect healing in 29 Sprague-Dawley rats in an animal laboratory.
INTERVENTIONS: The rats underwent creation of 1 of 4 segmental mandibular defects measuring 0, 1, 3, and 5 mm. All mandibular wounds were internally fixated with 1-mm microplates and screws and allowed to heal for 12 weeks, after which the animals were killed humanely. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Analysis with micro-computed tomography of bony union and formation graded on semiquantitative scales.
RESULTS: Seven animals were included in each experimental group. No 5-mm segmental defects successfully developed bony union, whereas all 0- and 1-mm defects had continuous bony growth across the original defect on micro-computed tomography. Three of the 3-mm defects had bony continuity, and 3 had no healing of the bony wound. Bone union scores were significantly lower for the 5-mm defects compared with the 0-, 1-, and 3-mm defects (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The rat segmental mandible model cannot heal a 5-mm segmental mandibular defect. Successful healing of 0-, 1-, and 3-mm defects confirms adequate stabilization of bony wounds with internal fixation with 1-mm microplates. The rat segmental mandibular critical-sized defect provides a clinically relevant testing ground for translatable mandibular tissue engineering efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24232293      PMCID: PMC4343284          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  35 in total

1.  Mandibular segmental defect regenerated with macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate, collagen membrane, and bone marrow graft in dogs.

Authors:  Franck Jégoux; Eric Goyenvalle; Ronan Cognet; Olivier Malard; Françoise Moreau; Guy Daculsi; Eric Aguado
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-10

Review 2.  The role of NELL-1, a growth factor associated with craniosynostosis, in promoting bone regeneration.

Authors:  X Zhang; J Zara; R K Siu; K Ting; C Soo
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Composite mandibulectomy: a novel animal model.

Authors:  Douglas R Sidell; Tara Aghaloo; Sotirios Tetradis; Min Lee; Olga Bezouglaia; Adam DeConde; Maie A St John
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Delivery of lyophilized Nell-1 in a rat spinal fusion model.

Authors:  Weiming Li; Min Lee; Julie Whang; Ronald K Siu; Xinli Zhang; Chen Liu; Benjamin M Wu; Jeffrey C Wang; Kang Ting; Chia Soo
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Difference in soft tissue response between immediate and delayed delivery suggests a new mechanism for recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 action in large segmental bone defects.

Authors:  Khaled A Hussein; Ibrahim E Zakhary; Ahmed R Elawady; Hany A Emam; Mohamed Sharawy; Babak Baban; Sara Akeel; Mohamed Al-Shabrawey; Mohammed E Elsalanty
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  Miniplate fixation for the repair of segmental mandibular defects filled with autogenous bone in cats.

Authors:  Adelina Maria da Silva; Wilson Machado de Souza; Marion Burkhardt de Koivisto; Patrícia de Athayde Barnabé; Nair Trevizan Machado de Souza
Journal:  Acta Cir Bras       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.388

7.  Bone regeneration in distraction osteogenesis demonstrates significantly increased vascularity in comparison to fracture repair in the mandible.

Authors:  Alexis Donneys; Catherine N Tchanque-Fossuo; Aaron S Farberg; Sagar S Deshpande; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  Repair of canine mandibular bone defects with bone marrow stromal cells and coral.

Authors:  Jie Yuan; Wen Jie Zhang; Guangpeng Liu; Min Wei; Zuo Liang Qi; Wei Liu; Lei Cui; Yi Lin Cao
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  Bone morphogenetic protein-2-impregnated biomimetic scaffolds successfully induce bone healing in a marginal mandibular defect.

Authors:  Adam S DeConde; Douglas Sidell; Min Lee; Olga Bezouglaia; Kyle Low; David Elashoff; Tristan Grogan; Sotirios Tetradis; Tara Aghaloo; Maie St John
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  A novel murine femoral segmental critical-sized defect model stabilized by plate osteosynthesis for bone tissue engineering purposes.

Authors:  Mathieu Manassero; Véronique Viateau; Romano Matthys; Mickael Deschepper; Rosario Vallefuoco; Morad Bensidhoum; Hervé Petite
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 3.056

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Is the Mandibular Growth Affected by Internal Rigid Fixation?: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Humberto Fernández-Olarte; Andrés Gómez-Delgado; Dayan López-Dávila; Rodolfo Rangel-Perdomo; Gloria Inés Lafaurie; Leandro Chambrone
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-09-29

2.  Nonvascularized Bone Graft Reconstruction of the Irradiated Murine Mandible: An Analogue of Clinical Head and Neck Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Kevin M Urlaub; Russell E Ettinger; Noah S Nelson; Jessie M Hoxie; Alicia E Snider; Joseph E Perosky; Yekaterina Polyatskaya; Alexis Donneys; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 3.  Implantable antimicrobial biomaterials for local drug delivery in bone infection models.

Authors:  Jeremy D Caplin; Andrés J García
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 8.947

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.