Adam S DeConde1, Matthew K Lee1, Douglas Sidell1, Tara Aghaloo2, Min Lee3, Sotirios Tetradis4, Kyle Low5, David Elashoff6, Tristan Grogan7, Ali R Sepahdari8, Maie St John9. 1. Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). 2. Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA3Division of Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry, UCLA4Division of Diagnostic and Surgical Sciences, School of Dentistry, UCLA. 3. Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA5Division of Advanced Prosthodontics, Biomaterials and Hospital Dentistry, School of Dentistry, UCLA. 4. Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA3Division of Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry, UCLA. 5. currently a postbaccalaureate student at School of Dentistry, UCLA. 6. Division of Diagnostic and Surgical Sciences, School of Dentistry, UCLA7Department of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA. 7. Department of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA. 8. Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA. 9. Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)2Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Advances in tissue engineering offer potential alternatives to current mandibular reconstructive techniques; however, before clinical translation of this technology, a relevant animal model must be used to validate possible interventions. OBJECTIVE: To establish the critical-sized segmental mandibular defect that does not heal spontaneously in the rat mandible. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study of mandibular defect healing in 29 Sprague-Dawley rats in an animal laboratory. INTERVENTIONS: The rats underwent creation of 1 of 4 segmental mandibular defects measuring 0, 1, 3, and 5 mm. All mandibular wounds were internally fixated with 1-mm microplates and screws and allowed to heal for 12 weeks, after which the animals were killed humanely. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Analysis with micro-computed tomography of bony union and formation graded on semiquantitative scales. RESULTS: Seven animals were included in each experimental group. No 5-mm segmental defects successfully developed bony union, whereas all 0- and 1-mm defects had continuous bony growth across the original defect on micro-computed tomography. Three of the 3-mm defects had bony continuity, and 3 had no healing of the bony wound. Bone union scores were significantly lower for the 5-mm defects compared with the 0-, 1-, and 3-mm defects (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The rat segmental mandible model cannot heal a 5-mm segmental mandibular defect. Successful healing of 0-, 1-, and 3-mm defects confirms adequate stabilization of bony wounds with internal fixation with 1-mm microplates. The rat segmental mandibular critical-sized defect provides a clinically relevant testing ground for translatable mandibular tissue engineering efforts.
IMPORTANCE: Advances in tissue engineering offer potential alternatives to current mandibular reconstructive techniques; however, before clinical translation of this technology, a relevant animal model must be used to validate possible interventions. OBJECTIVE: To establish the critical-sized segmental mandibular defect that does not heal spontaneously in the rat mandible. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study of mandibular defect healing in 29 Sprague-Dawley rats in an animal laboratory. INTERVENTIONS: The rats underwent creation of 1 of 4 segmental mandibular defects measuring 0, 1, 3, and 5 mm. All mandibular wounds were internally fixated with 1-mm microplates and screws and allowed to heal for 12 weeks, after which the animals were killed humanely. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Analysis with micro-computed tomography of bony union and formation graded on semiquantitative scales. RESULTS: Seven animals were included in each experimental group. No 5-mm segmental defects successfully developed bony union, whereas all 0- and 1-mm defects had continuous bony growth across the original defect on micro-computed tomography. Three of the 3-mm defects had bony continuity, and 3 had no healing of the bony wound. Bone union scores were significantly lower for the 5-mm defects compared with the 0-, 1-, and 3-mm defects (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The rat segmental mandible model cannot heal a 5-mm segmental mandibular defect. Successful healing of 0-, 1-, and 3-mm defects confirms adequate stabilization of bony wounds with internal fixation with 1-mm microplates. The rat segmental mandibular critical-sized defect provides a clinically relevant testing ground for translatable mandibular tissue engineering efforts.
Authors: Douglas R Sidell; Tara Aghaloo; Sotirios Tetradis; Min Lee; Olga Bezouglaia; Adam DeConde; Maie A St John Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Weiming Li; Min Lee; Julie Whang; Ronald K Siu; Xinli Zhang; Chen Liu; Benjamin M Wu; Jeffrey C Wang; Kang Ting; Chia Soo Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Khaled A Hussein; Ibrahim E Zakhary; Ahmed R Elawady; Hany A Emam; Mohamed Sharawy; Babak Baban; Sara Akeel; Mohamed Al-Shabrawey; Mohammed E Elsalanty Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2011-12-05 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Adelina Maria da Silva; Wilson Machado de Souza; Marion Burkhardt de Koivisto; Patrícia de Athayde Barnabé; Nair Trevizan Machado de Souza Journal: Acta Cir Bras Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 1.388
Authors: Alexis Donneys; Catherine N Tchanque-Fossuo; Aaron S Farberg; Sagar S Deshpande; Steven R Buchman Journal: J Craniofac Surg Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 1.046
Authors: Jie Yuan; Wen Jie Zhang; Guangpeng Liu; Min Wei; Zuo Liang Qi; Wei Liu; Lei Cui; Yi Lin Cao Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Adam S DeConde; Douglas Sidell; Min Lee; Olga Bezouglaia; Kyle Low; David Elashoff; Tristan Grogan; Sotirios Tetradis; Tara Aghaloo; Maie St John Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2013-04-02 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Kevin M Urlaub; Russell E Ettinger; Noah S Nelson; Jessie M Hoxie; Alicia E Snider; Joseph E Perosky; Yekaterina Polyatskaya; Alexis Donneys; Steven R Buchman Journal: J Craniofac Surg Date: 2019 Mar/Apr Impact factor: 1.046