Literature DB >> 9439662

Factor VIII gene mutations found by a comparative study of SSCP, DGGE and CMC and their analysis on a molecular model of factor VIII protein.

R Schwaab1, J Oldenburg, M R Lalloz, U Schwaab, S Pemberton, P Hanfland, H H Brackmann, E G Tuddenham, K Michaelides.   

Abstract

Screening of the factor VIII (FVIII) gene which spans 186 kb and codes for 26 exons, was originally hampered by its size but is now feasible because rapid DNA scanning methodologies have been developed. The present study for the first time directly compares the three most widely applied screening methods, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), single-stranded conformational polymorphism (SSCP) and chemical mismatch cleavage (CMC) for their sensitivity of mutation detection in a selected group of ten haemophilia A patients. Nine of these patients are known to be cross-reacting material positive and eight exhibited a mild to moderate phenotype. Of the ten patients screened, we identified mutations in nine by all three screening methods. Of the mutations characterised, two are previously unpublished. T to C (S373P) and G to A (D525N). In one mildly affected haemophiliac, we identified a second T to C sequence change in the 5' untranslated region at -601 bp, probably having no effect on FVIII gene expression. Modelling studies were performed on those mutations lying within the A domains of FVIII (D525N, R527W, I566T) to study the possible effect of these mutations on structure and/or function. When the three methods are performing optimally and have been standardised, our experience is that CMC and DGGE are equally efficient at sequence variation detection while SSCP is slightly less sensitive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9439662     DOI: 10.1007/s004390050636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  4 in total

Review 1.  PCR-SSCP: a method for the molecular analysis of genetic diseases.

Authors:  V Konstantinos Kakavas; Kakavas V Konstantinos; Panagiotis Plageras; Plageras Panagiotis; T Antonios Vlachos; Vlachos T Antonios; Agelos Papaioannou; Papaioannou Agelos; V Argiris Noulas; Noulas V Argiris
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Somatic mosaicism in hemophilia A: a fairly common event.

Authors:  M Leuer; J Oldenburg; J M Lavergne; M Ludwig; A Fregin; A Eigel; R Ljung; A Goodeve; I Peake; K Olek
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-06-14       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Identification of FVIII gene mutations in patients with hemophilia A using new combinatorial sequencing by hybridization.

Authors:  M Chetta; A Drmanac; R Santacroce; E Grandone; S Surrey; P Fortina; M Margaglione
Journal:  Indian J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-05

4.  Genetic analysis of haemophilia A in Bulgaria.

Authors:  Rumena Petkova; Stoian Chakarov; Ivo Kremensky
Journal:  BMC Blood Disord       Date:  2004-03-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.